评价理论视角下的商榷类文本分析
发布时间:2018-04-13 06:33
本文选题:商榷类文本 + 评价系统 ; 参考:《暨南大学》2014年硕士论文
【摘要】:商榷类文本是用于学术讨论的一种论说文体,常见于学术研究和实践。这一特定文体被用来宣传学术思想、发表个人见解、交流理论成果等。这种论说文体产生的原因在于商榷文作者对原作者的某一些说法或观点有所疑异或不赞同。出于学术讨论和交流目的,作者力求客观,但个人立场也通过语篇中各种词汇语法手段流露。同时,商榷文作者也试图与读者之间建立联系,最终宣示主张。笔者尝试研究汉语商榷语篇的评价意义和评价功能。 Martin等人在20世纪90年代初进一步发展了系统功能语言学的人际意义理论,,提出评价系统,但国内以此为框架的应用研究,特别是对汉语语料的研究尚不多见。 本文以系统功能语言学为理论基础,在评价系统的理论框架内,通过定性分析为主,定量分析为辅的研究方法,分析发表于核心期刊的外国语言文字类的商榷文中评价资源的分布及具体表现,即研究态度资源、介入资源以及级差资源各自的分布特征和表现,我们也希望借此来检验将评价系统理论应用于汉语语篇分析的可操作性,为商榷类文本研究提供一种新的视角,以期对商榷类文章的写作提供参考和建议。 本文分为五章:第一章是相关的研究背景,研究内容,研究目的,研究方法以及相关语料等的介绍;第二章是回顾评价理论以及其运用方面的国内外研究现状;第三章详细梳理本文主体分析部分所要用到的评价理论的理论框架;第四章从态度,介入和级差三个系统全面深入地分析各系统资源在商榷文中的分布状况及原因,并对各种评价资源进行举例说明;第五章是对全文的总结,陈述主要结论,创新之处以及研究局限,并指出进一步研究的建议。
[Abstract]:Argumentative text is a kind of argumentative style used in academic discussion, which is common in academic research and practice.This particular style is used to propagate academic ideas, express personal opinions, and communicate theoretical results.The reason for this theory is that the author disagrees with the original author.For the purpose of academic discussion and communication, the author tries to be objective, but his personal position is also revealed through various lexical and grammatical means in the discourse.At the same time, the authors also try to establish a relationship with the readers, and finally declare their views.The author tries to study the evaluative significance and function of Chinese discourse.In the early 1990s, Martin et al further developed the interpersonal meaning theory of systemic functional linguistics and put forward an evaluation system. However, there are few researches on the application of this framework in China, especially on Chinese corpus.This paper is based on the theory of systemic functional linguistics. Within the theoretical framework of the evaluation system, the research method is based on qualitative analysis and supplemented by quantitative analysis.This paper analyzes the distribution and specific performance of evaluation resources in foreign languages and characters published in core journals, that is, the distribution characteristics and performance of research attitude resources, intervention resources and graded resources.We also hope to test the maneuverability of applying the evaluation system theory to Chinese discourse analysis and provide a new perspective for the study of argumentative texts in order to provide references and suggestions for the writing of argumentative articles.This paper is divided into five chapters: the first chapter is the related research background, research content, research purposes, research methods and related corpus, the second chapter is a review of the evaluation theory and its application at home and abroad.The third chapter combs the theoretical framework of the evaluation theory used in the part of the main body analysis in detail, the fourth chapter comprehensively and deeply analyzes the distribution and reasons of the resources of each system from the attitude, the intervention and the differential system.The fifth chapter is a summary of the full text, stating the main conclusions, innovations and limitations of the research, and pointing out the suggestions for further research.
【学位授予单位】:暨南大学
【学位级别】:硕士
【学位授予年份】:2014
【分类号】:H05
【参考文献】
相关期刊论文 前10条
1 蔡虹;广告英语中的评价性语用指示词研究——基于评估理论的分析[J];解放军外国语学院学报;2005年02期
2 刘雪立;;关于“商榷”类文章写作和编辑的几点建议[J];中国科技期刊研究;2004年03期
3 袁秀凤;;英语叙述式招生广告的介入资源利用分析[J];外语研究;2007年04期
4 苏奕华;;翻译中的意义对等与态度差异[J];外语学刊;2008年05期
5 李战子;评价与文化模式[J];山东外语教学;2004年02期
6 钟兰凤;;评价理论、英语报刊教学与媒介素养教育[J];山东外语教学;2007年02期
7 马伟林;;评价理论对英语口语教学的启示[J];外语教学;2007年06期
8 廖传风;;评价理论与外语阅读教学——解读语篇主题思想的新方法[J];外语教学;2008年04期
9 张美芳;语言的评价意义与译者的价值取向[J];外语与外语教学;2002年07期
10 李发根;;评价的识别、功能和参数[J];外语与外语教学;2006年11期
本文编号:1743312
本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/wenyilunwen/hanyulw/1743312.html