《马氏文通》与日本广池《中国文法》——清末中日汉语文言语法理论体系的建立

发布时间：2018-04-14 23:40

本文选题：《马氏文通》 + 《中国文法》　；参考：《厦门大学学报(哲学社会科学版)》2011年03期

【摘要】：日本广池千九郎的《中国文法》晚出于《马氏文通》4年,并尝试对《马氏文通》进行学术批评。二者文言语法研究内容体例编排特点突出,语法理论体系各自有差异,但或多或少都与西方语法理论有关,同时也注意吸收中国传统训诂成果,尽管程度有所不同。在语法研究方法上,二者划分词类皆以词义为标准,注意语法意义标准,同时也都考虑了汉语文言语法词类划分和句法成分之间的关系。与《马氏文通》一样,广池的比较法也有共时比较、历时比较、中英比较、中日英比较等几类,甚至比前者更为明显。《中国文法》和《马氏文通》文言语法研究理论体系的建立,对我国汉语文言语法和白话语法理论体系的建立功绩巨大,对当今文言语法研究也有诸多启示。
[Abstract]:The Chinese Grammar of Hiroshi Chien-jiro, Japan, came out of "Mashitsu" for 4 years, and tried to make academic criticism on "Mashitsu".The two classical Chinese grammar studies have prominent characteristics of style arrangement and different grammatical theory systems, but they are more or less related to western grammar theories, but they also pay attention to absorbing the traditional Chinese exegesis achievements, although to a different degree.In terms of grammatical research methods, both of them divide parts of speech according to the meaning of words, pay attention to the standard of grammatical meaning, and also consider the relationship between the classification of parts of speech and syntactic elements in Chinese classical Chinese grammar.Like the "Ma Shi Wen Tong", there are several types of comparative methods in Guangchi, such as synchronic comparison, diachronic comparison, Sino-British comparison, Sino-Japanese comparison, and so on.It is even more obvious than the former. The establishment of the theoretical system of classical Chinese grammar research in "Chinese Grammar" and "Ma Shi Wen Tong" has made great contributions to the establishment of the theoretical system of Chinese classical Chinese grammar and vernacular grammar.There are also many enlightenments to the study of classical Chinese grammar.
【作者单位】：厦门大学中文系;
【基金】：国家社科基金项目“日本明治时期北京官话课本语言研究”(08BYY014)
【分类号】：H141

【共引文献】