主观化对句法限制的消解
发布时间:2018-04-20 22:34
本文选题:主观化 + 句法限制 ; 参考:《湖南大学》2010年硕士论文
【摘要】: 本文主要研究语言中句法限制被消解现象的两个方面:句法层面上许多原本不可接受或不自足的语法结构,因为加入一些主观性的成分,句子的可接受度大大增强;在语言演变的过程中,一些构式意义主观性增强后,句法功能发生转换。 关于意义主观化后句法限制得到消解的现象,国内外学术界的研究还比较零散。主要集中在四个方面:主观化与识解图式的变化,主观化与词序的选择,主观化与长距离反身代词化以及主观化与句法功能的扩展。这些研究成功地展示了主观化理论对句法现象的解释力,但研究还不够深入,同时也存在许多问题和不足。 本文主要运用主观化理论,对主观性因素进入语言的方式,这些语言形式对说话人的视角,情感和认识的表达,以及意义主观化与句法限制被消解二者的关系、消解的过程进行阐述。意义主观化是指语言为了表达说话人的情感、态度和认识等主观性因素而采取相应结构,对语言进行编码的过程。从认知语言学的角度来说,主观性和主观化在分析语义创造性和识解方面发挥着重要作用。 本研究得到如下认识:语言表现主观性的方式包括时体标记、情态动词、副词、语气词、数量结构、情态成分等,这些方式反映了说话人的态度、视角和情感;句子主观化以后,不再是对单纯命题意义的表达,转而表达说话人对该事件的评价、认识、或判断,句法功能抽象化、语用化,主观化的结果是使句子获得了语篇和元语言功能,句子的可接受度提高;构式意义主观化后,原有的句法形态、选择限制消失,从而使句法功能得到转换。 本文通过对句法限制被消解现象的系统研究,表明主观化理论能为句子可接受度的提高和句法功能的扩展等问题提供较为合理的解释。一方面有助于从一个新的视角加深对相关语言现象的共性认识;另一方面,对运用主观化理论解释英汉语句法问题也具有一定的参考价值。
[Abstract]:This paper focuses on two aspects of the deconstruction of syntactic restrictions in language: at the syntactic level, many grammatical structures that are not acceptable or self-sufficient are introduced, because of the addition of some subjective elements, the acceptability of sentences is greatly enhanced; In the process of language evolution, the syntactic function changes after the subjectivity of some construction meanings is enhanced. As to the phenomenon that the syntactic restriction has been dispelled after the subjectivization of meaning, the research in academic circles at home and abroad is still scattered. It mainly focuses on four aspects: the change of subjective and decipherable schemata, the choice of subjectivization and word order, the subjectivization and long distance reflexive pronoun, and the subjectivization and the expansion of syntactic function. These studies have successfully demonstrated the explanatory power of the subjective theory on syntactic phenomena, but the research is not deep enough, and there are many problems and deficiencies at the same time. This paper mainly applies the theory of subjectivity to the way that subjective factors enter into language, the expression of these linguistic forms to the speaker's perspective, emotion and cognition, as well as the relationship between the subjective meaning and the elimination of syntactic restriction. The process of digestion is described. Meaning subjectivization refers to the process of language coding by adopting the corresponding structure to express the subjective factors such as emotion attitude and cognition of the speaker. From the perspective of cognitive linguistics, subjectivity and subjectivity play an important role in the analysis of semantic creativity and understanding. The main findings of this study are as follows: the subjective ways of language expression include tense and aspect markers, modal verbs, adverbs, mood words, quantitative structures, modal elements, and so on, which reflect the attitude, perspective and emotion of the speaker; After the sentence is subjective, it is no longer the expression of the simple propositional meaning, but instead expresses the speaker's evaluation, cognition, judgment, syntactic function abstraction and pragmatics of the event. The result of the subjectivization is that the sentence obtains the functions of discourse and meta-language, and the acceptance of the sentence is improved. After the subjective construction, the original syntactic form, the choice restriction disappears, and the syntactic function is transformed. Based on the systematic study of the phenomenon that syntactic restriction is dispelled, this paper shows that the subjective theory can provide a more reasonable explanation for the improvement of sentence acceptability and the expansion of syntactic function. On the one hand, it helps to deepen the common understanding of the related linguistic phenomena from a new perspective; on the other hand, it has some reference value for the interpretation of English and Chinese sentence methods by using the subjective theory.
【学位授予单位】:湖南大学
【学位级别】:硕士
【学位授予年份】:2010
【分类号】:H043
【参考文献】
相关期刊论文 前10条
1 王立和;副词“不”的非否定用法[J];吉林师范学院学报;1995年04期
2 张敏;从类型学和认知语法的角度看汉语重叠现象[J];国外语言学;1997年02期
3 邓英树,黄谷;论“不A不B”的否定意义及其制约因素[J];四川师范学院学报(哲学社会科学版);2002年04期
4 吴吟;汉语重叠研究综述[J];汉语学习;2000年03期
5 殷志平;关于“一身冷汗”一类短语的性质和特点[J];汉语学习;2000年04期
6 项开喜;事物的突显性与标记词“大”[J];汉语学习;1998年01期
7 谢瑛;新时期汉语语法AABB重叠式刍议[J];汉语学习;1998年01期
8 周明强;论“好不AP”、“好AP”中的AP[J];汉语学习;1998年01期
9 沈清淮;名词的AABB叠合[J];汉语学习;1998年03期
10 李宇明;“一V…数量”结构及其主观大量问题[J];汉语学习;1999年04期
,本文编号:1779770
本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/wenyilunwen/hanyulw/1779770.html