“不是X的X”构式生成和解读的认知机制
本文选题:不是X的X + 外延内涵传承 ; 参考:《河南大学》2012年硕士论文
【摘要】:本文以现代汉语中“不是X的X”这一结构为考察对象,考察其寓意和形式建构及解读机制。“不是X的X”是现代汉语中一个特殊的语言现象,其使用广泛又独具特色。“不是X的X”是汉语定中结构的一种,如“不是女人的女人”、“不是美好的美好”、“不是办法的办法”、“不是玩具的玩具”等。此结构是X的否定式修饰X,,结构助词“的”不能省略。其先否定X接着又肯定X,虽然字面上给人以矛盾感但是深层意义不但不矛盾而且表述简练含意深刻,耐人寻味。目前对此语言现象的研究并不多。前人对“不是X的X”结构的研究主要集中在句法,语义,修辞方面,但是对此结构的生成机制的研究鲜有人涉及。因此,本文试图在认知语言学理论框架下,对“不是X的X”结构进行系统全面的分析和考察,基于徐盛桓教授提出的外延内涵的传承理论对其生成机制进行研究。 本文将“不是X的X”看作是一个构式。因其形式和功能的某些方面不能从其组成成分中得到完全预测,并对能进入这一构式的成分进行了分析和讨论。基于对语料的分析,结合语境和语义,本研究从范畴的角度将“不是X的X”构式分为三类。第一类是此构式的陈述对象与X分属不同的范畴,但陈述对象具有X的某些主要属性,二者具体隐喻的关系。第二类是陈述对象属于X范畴,但是陈述对象是X范畴的非典型成员。第三类是陈述对象与X同属一个范畴,陈述对象是此范畴的边缘成员,此类往往表达一种不得已,不得不的无奈的意味。 其次,本研究对“不是X的X”构式的构式义进行了分析。第一类即构式义一是在语境下凸显陈述对象所具有的X的某一内涵属性。第二类即构式义二为凸显X与“不是X的X”的属性的反向相邻关系。第三类即构式义三为凸显X范畴的典型与非典型成员的让步关系。 基于以上的研究,本文应用外延内涵的传承理论对“不是X的X”的生成机制进行分析,即为什么“X”可以说成是“不是X的X”。构式义一是“X”与“不是X的X”特征属性的传承。构式义二是“X”与“不是X的X”基于相邻关系下二者的内涵内容反向传承的结果。构式义三是“X”与“不是X的X”内涵的让步传承。 本文由六章构成。 第一章是本文的引言部分,主要介绍本文的研究的对象、研究问题、方法、目的和意义以及语料的收集。 第二章是文献综述部分,回顾了前人对“不是X的X”结构的研究。肯定他们的研究,同时也指出研究的不足以及本研究的创新之处。 第三章是理论框架部分,主要对徐盛桓教授的外延内涵传承理论的阐释,以及基于此理论提出本研究的解释框架。 第四章是对“不是X的X”构式的特点的分析。对此构式的组成,进入这一构式的成分以及分类作了系统全面的考察,并对其构式义进行了分析。 第五章是对“不是X的X”构式的认知解读。基于外延内涵传承理论对其生成机制进行详细的解释。 第六章是本文的结论部分,总结本研究的发现,提出研究的不足。
[Abstract]:This paper, based on the structure of "not X X" in modern Chinese, examines its meaning and form of construction and interpretation. "X not X" is a special language phenomenon in modern Chinese, which is widely used and unique. "Not X X" is a kind of Chinese fixed structure, such as "a woman who is not a woman", "not a woman". "Not a woman of a woman" "Beautiful beauty", "not a method", "not a toy toy", etc. this structure is a negative modification of the X X, the structural auxiliary "" can not be omitted. It first denies X and then affirms X, although it literally gives people a sense of contradiction but the deep meaning is not contradictory, it is concise and thought-provoking. At present, it is intriguing and thought-provoking. There are few studies on language phenomena. Previous studies on the structure of "not X X" are mainly focused on syntactic, semantic and rhetorical aspects, but there are few people involved in the study of the formation mechanism of this structure. Therefore, this paper tries to make a systematic and comprehensive analysis and investigation of the structure of "not X X" under the framework of cognitive linguistics, based on Xu. Professor Sheng Huan put forward the extension theory of extension connotation to study its formation mechanism.
In this paper, "not X's X" is considered as a structure. Because some aspects of its form and function can not be fully predicted from its components, and the components that can enter this structure are analyzed and discussed. Based on the analysis of the corpus and the context and semantics, this study divides the "X" structure of "not X" from the perspective of category. The three category. The first category is that the statement object of this structure belongs to the category of X, but the statement object has some main attributes of X and the relation of the specific metaphor. The second category is that the statement object belongs to the X category, but the statement object is the atypical member of the X category. The third category is the category of the same category as the image and X, and the statement object is this category. The marginal members of this kind often express an inevitable and compelled sense of helplessness.
Secondly, this study analyses the constructional meaning of the "not X X" structure. The first category, the constructional meaning, highlights a certain connotation attribute of the X that the stated object has in the context. The second category is the opposite relationship between the X and the attributes of "X not X". The third category is the typical and the typical meaning of the X category. The concession of an atypical member.
Based on the above research, this paper applies the inheritance theory of denotation to the analysis of the generation mechanism of "not X X", that is, why "X" can be said to be "not X of X". One is the inheritance of "X" and "X" "not X". The constructional sense two is the two of "X" and "not X X" based on the adjacent relations. The three is the concession and inheritance of the connotation of "X" and "not X X".
This article is composed of six chapters.
The first chapter is the introduction of this article, which mainly introduces the object of this study, research questions, methods, purposes and significance, as well as the collection of corpus.
The second chapter is a literature review, which reviews previous studies on the "X" structure of "not X", affirms their research, and points out the shortcomings of the research and the innovation of this study.
The third chapter is the theoretical framework. It mainly explains professor Xu Shenghuan's extension theory of connotation and inheritance, and puts forward the explanatory framework of this study based on this theory.
The fourth chapter is the analysis of the characteristics of the "X" structure, which is not X. The composition of this structure, the composition and classification of this structure are systematically investigated, and the meaning of its structure is analyzed.
The fifth chapter is a cognitive interpretation of the "X structure" which is not X. Based on the theory of extension connotation and inheritance, its generative mechanism is explained in detail.
The sixth chapter is the conclusion of this paper, summarizing the findings of this study, and putting forward the deficiencies of the study.
【学位授予单位】:河南大学
【学位级别】:硕士
【学位授予年份】:2012
【分类号】:H146
【相似文献】
相关期刊论文 前10条
1 杨增宏;曹德和;;原型范畴化下的意识流小说属性及其界定[J];求索;2011年06期
2 张明宇;;基于原型理论的名称意义再范畴化[J];天中学刊;2011年04期
3 袁玲;;范畴典型与文化差异[J];英语广场(学术研究);2011年Z5期
4 王文丽;;原型范畴理论与大学英语词汇教学[J];出国与就业(就业版);2011年12期
5 罗明清;蔡桂成;;认知视角下的英语教学[J];吉林广播电视大学学报;2011年07期
6 ;[J];;年期
7 ;[J];;年期
8 ;[J];;年期
9 ;[J];;年期
10 ;[J];;年期
相关会议论文 前10条
1 马永腾;亢世勇;;非典型成员的语义标注策略和问题[A];内容计算的研究与应用前沿——第九届全国计算语言学学术会议论文集[C];2007年
2 唐树华;;原型与意义推断-动词break之原型与意义推断实证研究[A];第四届全国认知语言学研讨会论文摘要汇编[C];2006年
3 杨万兵;赵燕;;PSC评分体系的原型理论阐释[A];第二届全国普通话水平测试学术研讨会论文集[C];2004年
4 李颖;;从典型范畴理论看模糊语言的两个维度[A];第四届全国认知语言学研讨会论文摘要汇编[C];2006年
5 许小星;亢世勇;孙茂松;刘金凤;;语料库语义成分标注的若干问题[A];第三届学生计算语言学研讨会论文集[C];2006年
6 ;Flexible Evaluation System for the Flexible Platform Oriented Towards the Research and Development of Modern Instruments[A];Proceedings of the 2011 Chinese Control and Decision Conference(CCDC)[C];2011年
7 郭中;易美珍;;篇章语序的认知功能分析[A];江西省语言学会2006年年会论文集[C];2006年
8 ;A Model for University Counselor's Competence Evaluation Based on GIOWA Operator[A];Proceedings of 2010 Chinese Control and Decision Conference[C];2010年
9 ;A Model for University Teaching Teacher's Competence Evaluation Based on Information Entropy and Unascertained Measure[A];Proceedings of 2010 Chinese Control and Decision Conference[C];2010年
10 ;Research for methods of pursuing product identity strategy[A];Proceedings of 2010 Chinese Control and Decision Conference[C];2010年
相关博士学位论文 前5条
1 田延明;语言离散—连续图式表征认知模式研究[D];上海外国语大学;2012年
2 王丽彩;现代汉语方式范畴研究[D];暨南大学;2008年
3 匡芳涛;英语专业词汇教学研究[D];西南大学;2010年
4 吴迪龙;互文性视角下的中国古典诗歌英译研究[D];上海外国语大学;2010年
5 刘红梅;汉语聚合词语研究[D];山东师范大学;2012年
相关硕士学位论文 前10条
1 马浩;“不是X的X”构式生成和解读的认知机制[D];河南大学;2012年
2 艾哈迈德;“X什么X”及其相关构式研究[D];上海师范大学;2012年
3 陈赛华;中法数学联想意义比较研究及其翻译对策[D];上海外国语大学;2010年
4 宋岩;中国英语学习者对比性标记语使用的类典型性分析[D];东北师范大学;2006年
5 赵芳;现代汉语副词重叠研究[D];上海师范大学;2008年
6 马闻生;英语新词的形成机制研究[D];河南大学;2011年
7 连冰晶;狂欢的盛宴[D];四川外语学院;2012年
8 胡考峰;英汉双及物构式的对比研究[D];湖南师范大学;2007年
9 蒋叶红;现代汉语述宾式“V+VP”结构研究[D];上海师范大学;2008年
10 武琦;法语中专有名词的语义研究[D];上海外国语大学;2010年
本文编号:1898144
本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/wenyilunwen/hanyulw/1898144.html