中国大学生即兴演讲中模糊限制语的人际意义—评价理论视角

发布时间：2018-05-22 09:00

本文选题：模糊限制语 + 即兴演讲　；参考：《新疆大学》2012年硕士论文

【摘要】：在即兴演讲中，演讲者不仅要就命题提出自己的见解，而且还要处理与裁判、听众等各种复杂的人际关系。因此，即兴演讲中的人际意义是基本且复杂的。在即兴演讲中，为了使自己的观点易于接受并具有意义，模糊限制语作为一种非常有效的策略被演讲者广泛地用来协调可能会遇到的各种人际关系。长期以来，，韩礼德的系统功能语法被认为是分析人际意义的强有力的工具。但在系统功能语法中，人际意义的实现主要着眼于语气和情态。王振华（2001:13）认为其忽视了对对话人的赋值语义的研究，马丁意识到了这一盲点。在系统功能语法的基础上提出了评价理论，深化了人际意义的研究。评价理论提出后，广泛应用于各种文本，被认为是阐释人际意义的理想工具。本文以评价理论为理论框架，探讨作为不同评价资源的模糊限制语的分布情况，以及其所表达的人际意义。本文从“21世纪杯”大学生英语演讲比赛中抽取了50篇中国大学生的即兴演讲进行了数据分析，采取定性和定量互补的研究方法。研究结果发现模糊限制语以介入资源和极差资源的形式广泛存在于即兴演讲中，但表达了不同的人际意义。作为介入资源的模糊限制语体现了演讲者愿意与不同声音展开对话，承认不同声音的共存。对话拓展和对话压缩都体现演讲者愿意与听众进行互动。这样有利于演讲者和听众结成同盟，建立和谐统一的关系。作为级差资源的模糊限制语不仅可以帮助演讲者表达自己的立场，还可以使演讲者通过增强自己的评价主张极力地说服听众或者降低自己的评价主张来避免自己的观点过于绝对，以便增加言语的说服力。本研究有助于演讲者理解如何在演讲中使用模糊限制语达到自己的交际目的。理解了模糊限制语的人际意义，听众能更好地理解演讲者的真正意图。同时，此研究可以帮助学生提高模糊限制语的使用意识，增强对其特点与功能的了解.
[Abstract]:In the improvisation speech, the speaker should not only put forward his own opinion on the proposition, but also deal with various complicated interpersonal relationships with the referee, audience and so on. Therefore, the interpersonal meaning of improvisation speech is basic and complex. In order to make their views acceptable and meaningful in improvisation speech hedges as a very effective strategy are widely used by the speaker to coordinate all kinds of interpersonal relationships that may be encountered. For a long time, Halliday's systemic functional grammar has been regarded as a powerful tool for analyzing interpersonal meaning. But in systemic functional grammar, the realization of interpersonal meaning mainly focuses on mood and modality. Wang Zhenhua / 2001: 13) thinks that it ignores the study of the assignment semantics of dialogs, and Martin realizes this blind spot. On the basis of systemic functional grammar, this paper puts forward the theory of evaluation, which deepens the study of interpersonal meaning. The theory of evaluation has been widely used in various texts and is regarded as an ideal tool for interpreting interpersonal meaning. Based on the theory of evaluation, this paper discusses the distribution of hedges as different evaluation resources and their interpersonal meaning. In this paper, 50 impromptu speeches of Chinese college students in the 21st Century Cup English speech contest are selected for data analysis, and qualitative and quantitative complementary research methods are adopted. The results show that hedges are widely used in improvisation speech in the form of intervention resources and extremely poor resources, but they express different interpersonal meanings. As an intervention resource, hedges reflect the speaker's willingness to engage in dialogue with different voices and acknowledge the coexistence of different voices. Dialogue expansion and dialogue compression both reflect the speaker's willingness to interact with the audience. This helps the speaker and the audience form an alliance and build a harmonious and unified relationship. Vague hedges, as a hierarchical resource, can not only help speakers express their positions, It can also enable the speaker to try to persuade the audience or lower his opinion to avoid his opinion being too strong, so as to increase the persuasiveness of the speech. This study helps speakers understand how to use hedges to achieve their communicative purposes. By understanding the interpersonal meaning of hedges, the audience can better understand the real intention of the speaker. At the same time, this study can help students to improve their awareness of the use of hedges, and enhance their understanding of their characteristics and functions.
【学位授予单位】：新疆大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2012
【分类号】：H146

【参考文献】