时间副词“正”、“正在”、“在”的优先序列研究

发布时间：2018-05-26 09:13

本文选题：时间副词“正”、“正在”、“在” + 语体差别　；参考：《华中师范大学》2012年硕士论文

【摘要】：本文重在对时间副词“正”、“正在”、“在”进行优先序列研究,优先序列研究是建立在数据统计基础上的定量分析,通过对语言现象的充分描写和观察,对形成的优先序列做出合理的解释。本文主要内容包括：第一章考察时间副词“正”、“正在”、“在”的使用情况及优先序列。在不区分语体的情况下对全部语料进行统计分析,发现时间副词“在”的使用频率最高,优先序列为(“＞”表示“优先于”)“在正正在”。第二章讨论时间副词“正”、“正在”、“在”的语体差别及优先序列。把语料分为口头语体、科技语体、文艺语体、政论语体、事务语体五部分,观察时间副词“正”、“正在”、“在”在不同语体中的使用情况,发现在口头语体、文艺语体、科技语体中“在”的使用频率最高,优先序列为“在正正在”,在政论语体中“正在”的使用频率最高,在事务语体中三个时间副词几乎不出现。第三章讨论时间副词“正”、“正在”、“在”与“着”、“呢”的共现情况及优先序列。通过对时间副词“正”、“正在”、“在”和“着”、“呢”共现情况的描写及对语料的统计,发现时间副词“正”更倾向跟“着”、“呢”共现,优先序列为“正在正在”。第四章讨论时间副词“正”、“正在”、“在”和“V/VP”组配的优先序列。分别考察时间副词“正”、“正在”、“在”和不同类型动词V、动词短语VP的组配情况,找出组配时的倾向性,把这种倾向性通过具体数据表现出来。发现“正”、“正在”、“在”倾向跟活动动词和终结动词组配,不常跟状态动词和瞬间终结动词组配；倾向跟动宾短语和状中式动词短语组配,不常跟兼语短语组配。第五章本文的结论和不足之处。通过优先序列考察发现“正”、“正在”、“在”最大的使用差别在于“正”、“在”和“正在”是语体上的差别,而“正”和“正在”、“在’是自足性上的差别,“正”所在的小句倾向于不自足。
[Abstract]:This paper focuses on the study of the priority sequence of the time adverbs "positive", "being" and "in". The priority sequence study is a quantitative analysis based on data statistics, through the full description and observation of linguistic phenomena. Make a reasonable explanation of the priority sequence formed. The main contents of this paper are as follows: The first chapter examines the use and priority sequence of time adverbs "Zheng", "is" and "you". Through the statistical analysis of all the corpus without distinguishing the language style, it is found that the time adverb "Ze" is the most frequently used, and the priority sequence is (">" means "first over") "is in positive". Chapter two discusses the stylistic differences and priority sequences of time adverbs "Zheng", "is" and "you". The corpus is divided into five parts: oral style, scientific and technical style, literary style, political theory style, business style, observing the use of time adverbs "Zheng", "being", "in different styles", and finding out that they are used in colloquial style, literary style, etc. The frequency of "Zai" is the highest in the scientific and technological style, the priority sequence is "in the positive being", the "is" in the political style is the highest, and the three time adverbs almost do not appear in the transaction style. Chapter three discusses the co-occurrence and priority sequence of time adverbs "Zheng", "is", "Zai" and "Zhe". By describing the co-occurrence of time adverbs "positive", "being", "Zhe" and "er" and statistics on the corpus, it is found that the time adverb "positive" is more inclined to co-appear with "Zhe", "er" is co-occurring, and the priority sequence is "being". Chapter 4 discusses the priority sequence of time adverbs "Zheng", "is", "Zu" and "V/VP". This paper investigates the combination of time adverbs "positive", "being", "in" and different types of verbs Vand verb phrase VP, finds out the tendency of matching time, and displays this tendency through concrete data. It is found that "positive", "being" and "Zai" tend to match with active verbs and terminative verbs, but not with state verbs and instantaneous terminative verbs, and tend to match with verb-object phrases and Chinese verb phrases, not with concurrent phrases. Chapter 5 the conclusion and deficiency of this paper. It is found that "positive", "being", "being" and "in" are stylistic differences between "positive", "being" and "being", while "positive" and "being" are differences in self-sufficiency. The clause "Zheng" tends to be unself-sufficient.
【学位授予单位】：华中师范大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2012
【分类号】：H146.2

【参考文献】