汉语语用歧义的研究

发布时间：2018-06-02 18:36

本文选题：歧义 + 语用　；参考：《天津大学》2012年硕士论文

【摘要】：作为人类语言一种特殊而又普遍的现象，歧义一直是语言学家关注的热点，同时，歧义研究的理论成果相当丰富。时至今日，歧义研究从定性分析和静态描写发展到今天歧义的应用性和跨学科研究，业已形成多种视角和方法并存的理论态势。但是，目前歧义研究中仍然存在很多问题，比如术语名称使用不统一，有些与歧义相关的概念界定不够严密，研究角度虽多，，但一些研究视角尚缺乏系统性和理论性，最有代表性的就是语用歧义研究。语用歧义，作为歧义的一种类型，是本文的研究对象。和以往主要从语法、语义角度的歧义研究不同，本文从现实生活中具体的语用歧义案例出发，主要从语用学的角度讨论语用歧义的生成、认知及在交际中的运用问题。在梳理了前人的歧义研究中与歧义类型划分相关的资料后，对歧义的类型描述有所认知，并针对目前歧义分类研究中术语名称使用混乱的问题，考察了“语用歧义”这一术语的科学性，同时对其内涵进行了界定，随后，对语用歧义的具体类型进行了描述。用语用学的相关理论对歧义现象进行系统的阐述是本文的重点，在对语用歧义的生成、认知机制进行探讨的基础上，又从交际的角度主要讨论语用歧义的功能，对语用歧义的本质有了进一步的了解。
[Abstract]:As a special and universal phenomenon in human language, ambiguity has always been a hot topic for linguists. At the same time, the theoretical results of ambiguity research are quite rich. Up to now, the research on ambiguity has developed from qualitative analysis and static description to the application and interdisciplinary study of ambiguity today, which has formed a theoretical trend of coexistence of various perspectives and methods. However, there are still many problems in the research of ambiguity, such as the inconsistent use of terms and names, the lack of strict definition of some concepts related to ambiguity, and the lack of systematic and theoretical perspectives. The most representative is the study of pragmatic ambiguity. Pragmatic ambiguity, as a type of ambiguity, is the object of this paper. Different from the previous researches on ambiguity from the perspectives of grammar and semantics, this paper discusses the generation, cognition and application of pragmatic ambiguity from the perspective of pragmatics, starting from the practical cases of pragmatic ambiguity. After combing the data related to the classification of ambiguity types in previous studies, the author has a cognitive view on the description of ambiguity types, and aims at the confusion in the use of terms and names in the current research of ambiguity classification. This paper examines the scientific nature of the term "pragmatic ambiguity", defines its connotation, and then describes the specific types of pragmatic ambiguity. It is the focal point of this paper to systematically expound the phenomenon of ambiguity with the relevant theories of pragmatics. On the basis of the discussion of the formation and cognitive mechanism of pragmatic ambiguity, the function of pragmatic ambiguity is mainly discussed from the angle of communication. We have a better understanding of the nature of pragmatic ambiguity.
【学位授予单位】：天津大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2012
【分类号】：H146

【参考文献】