《说文》部首与字原研究

发布时间：2018-06-09 13:34

本文选题：说文解字 + 部首　；参考：《江西师范大学》2012年硕士论文

【摘要】：东汉许慎撰著的《说文解字》（以下简称《说文》），乃文字学的奠基之作，历代学者进行文字研究始终以《说文》为本。唐代开始，不断有人围绕《说文》部首研究汉字字原，逐渐形成了“字原学”。一直到南宋郑樵才从文字孳乳繁衍的角度开始了真正意义上的字原研究。清代仍有人从事这方面的研究，却依然把540部首都看作字原。近现代学者已经明确部首与字原是两个不同的概念，不能够混为一谈。本文在总结前人研究的成果以及局限的基础上，对部首与字原的关系进行详细阐述，试图梳理清楚两者的区别与联系，并且判定出540部首中的真正字原。本论文共分为四个部分：一、引言。叙述研究现状，总结字原研究中存在的问题与不足。明确本文的研究意义、研究对象及范围以及研究方法等。二、部首与字原。首先，分析部首的定义、作用，《说文》部首的确立对后代字典编纂的重要意义以及与后代产生的检字法部首的区别。其次，提出字原的定义，并且研究字原与汉字构形的关系。最后，在前文论述的基础上，，总结部首与字原的区别与联系。三、《说文》部首当中的字原。在对汉字结构类型进行研究的基础上，确立判定字原的标准，并付诸于判断小篆字原的实践中。对于已确定的字原，根据不同属性将它们划分为原始字原、分化字原与特殊字原三类。四、《说文》中的字原与甲骨文、金文字原的比较。首先，分别对甲骨文、金文中的字原进行归纳，在与小篆字原对比之后分析出早期字原的基本特征。其次，把三个阶段归纳得出的字原进行历时的比较，探寻它们之间继承与发展的关系。最后，在前文对比分析的基础上得出字原在汉字发展到一定阶段之后会逐步稳定在一定数量的结论。
[Abstract]:In the Eastern Han Dynasty, Xu Shen wrote "Shuo Wen Jie Zi" (hereinafter referred to as Shuo Wen), which is the foundation of philology. At the beginning of Tang Dynasty, people began to study the origin of Chinese characters around the radical of Shuo Wen, and gradually formed the Chronology of Chinese characters. It was not until the Southern Song Dynasty that Zheng Qiao began to study the origin of characters from the angle of reproduction. In the Qing Dynasty, there were still people studying this area, but 540 capitals were still regarded as the originals. Modern scholars have made it clear that radical and original are two different concepts and cannot be confused. On the basis of summarizing the achievements and limitations of previous studies, this paper elaborates the relationship between the radical and the original, tries to sort out the difference and relation between the two, and determines the true character in 540 parts. This paper is divided into four parts: first, introduction. This paper describes the present situation of the research and summarizes the problems and shortcomings in the study of the original characters. Clear the significance of this study, research object and scope and research methods. First of all, it analyzes the definition and function of the radical, the significance of the establishment of the radical to the compilation of the dictionary for future generations, and the difference between the definition of the radical and the branch of the Chinese character checking method produced by the offspring. Secondly, the definition of the original is proposed, and the relationship between the original and the configuration of Chinese characters is studied. Finally, on the basis of the previous discussion, the author summarizes the differences and relations between the radical and the original. On the basis of the study of the structural types of Chinese characters, the standard of judging the original characters is established and put into practice. For the determined characters, according to their different attributes, they can be divided into three types: the original and the special. Fourth, the comparison of the original in Shuowen with the oracle bone inscription and the original of the gold character. Firstly, the author summarizes the characters in oracle bone inscriptions and Jin characters, and analyzes the basic characteristics of the early characters after contrasting with Xiaozhuan characters. Secondly, the three stages are compared to explore the relationship between inheritance and development. Finally, on the basis of comparative analysis, it is concluded that the original character will be stabilized in a certain number after the development of Chinese characters to a certain stage.
【学位授予单位】：江西师范大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2012
【分类号】：H161

【相似文献】