现代汉语“化”缀的演变及其结构来源

发布时间：2018-06-22 02:56

本文选题：语法化研究 + 现代汉语　；参考：《河南师范大学学报(哲学社会科学版)》2011年02期

【摘要】：当前,语法化研究是中国语言学界关注的热点。这种"热"不仅反映在研究者人数的增多上,更体现在人们对语法化理论的认识程度上,即在不满足既有知识状况的前提下开始的探索与反思,换言之,它是学界从知识论角度对作为方法的语法化理论进行的重新思量与考究。比如,对于一些不能用语法化理论涵盖的语言现象,它们是否应该理所当然地被排斥在理论的讨论之外?对于历史上曾经出现过的纷繁复杂的汉语语言现象,我们又应该在哪一个层面使用这样的理论阐释?为了对这一问题作出回应,本栏目特邀请国内汉语语法化研究的知名学者和专家,推出三篇笔谈。张谊生教授的文章从虚词的实化与语素的词化、陌生化变异与合理化误用、历史语料的中断与错位等方面,提出语法化理论在应对汉语语言现象时并非完全有效。另两篇则是运用语法化理论对汉语语言现象具体阐释的案例。方梅教授等的文章以现代汉语"化"缀的演变为中心,考证了化缀词"X化"的来源问题。崔应贤教授的文章则以汉语动词重叠的演变现象为中心场域加以考察,得出尝试义在这一语言变化中起到了主导作用,并大致经历了从词汇意义、句法组合到词法形式三个阶段的结论。上述探讨,触及了语法化理论在中国语言学研究领域的合法性问题。本刊特将其编辑发表,也是希望能以此为契机,在质疑与辩护的互动中,将汉语语法化研究推向引入,从而进一步促进汉语语法化研究的繁荣。
[Abstract]:At present, the study of grammaticalization is a hot topic in the Chinese linguistic circle. This "heat" is not only reflected in the increase in the number of researchers, but also in the understanding of the theory of grammaticalization, that is, the exploration and reflection starting from the premise that the existing knowledge is not satisfied. In other words, it is the language from the perspective of the theory of knowledge to the language as a language. For example, for some linguistic phenomena that can not be covered by the theory of grammaticalization, for example, should they be excluded from the discussion of the theory, and at what level we should use this theory to explain the complicated and complicated Chinese language phenomena that have appeared in history. In order to respond to this problem, this column invites famous scholars and experts of Chinese Chinese grammaticalization research to introduce three articles. Zhang Yi Sheng's essay puts forward the theory of grammaticalization in dealing with Chinese from the aspects of the reality and morpheme of the function words, the misuse of the Defamiliarization and rationalization, the interruption and dislocation of the historical corpus. The language phenomenon is not completely effective. The other two is a case of applying the theory of grammaticalization to the specific interpretation of the Chinese language phenomenon. The article of Professor Fang Mei, centered on the evolution of the "chemical" affixes of modern Chinese, examines the origin of the "X" of the suffix, and professor Cui Yingxian's article takes the evolution of the overlapping of Chinese verbs as the central field. It is concluded that trying meaning has played a leading role in the change of the language, and has roughly experienced the conclusion from three stages of lexical meaning, syntactic combination and lexical form. The above discussion touches the legality of the theory of grammaticalization in the field of Chinese linguistics. In the interaction between questioning and defense, the Chinese grammar research is pushed into the Chinese language, thus further promoting the prosperity of Chinese grammaticalization research.
【作者单位】：中国社会科学院研究生院;中国社会科学院语言研究所;
【分类号】：H146

【参考文献】