自嘲的语用研究

发布时间：2018-06-25 06:14

本文选题：自嘲 + 语用元素　；参考：《长沙理工大学》2012年硕士论文

【摘要】：自嘲，作为生活中有效的交际工具之一，能够调节交际气氛，减轻精神压力，同时也能修复人际关系，在社会活动中起着重大作用。目前，国内的自嘲研究大多是从社会交际和文学赏析角度展开，主要涉及自嘲的交际功能以及文学作品中所隐含的自嘲意识等。这些研究丰富了自嘲话语的研究成果，提供了宝贵的素材，但也存在不足之处：这些研究多集中于自嘲的社会交际价值，忽视了自嘲的产生和理解机制。本文旨在运用乖讹论、关联理论在认知语用框架内对“自嘲”的社会交际价值及语用实质进行分析，重点关注自嘲的语用元素以及产生和理解机制，意在为自嘲话语的研究开辟一条新的思路，以及更好的运用和解读自嘲话语。全文共分为四章。第一章回顾了自嘲和乖讹论的文献综述，重点介绍了乖讹论的历史发展过程，以及有关模式及应用。第二章从语用视角对自嘲话语做了进一步研究，分别探讨了自嘲的界定、分类和限制条件，并着重探讨了自嘲的语用特征、表达方式和语用功能。第三章运用乖讹论阐释了自嘲的产生机制。该部分首先引入了表征概念，然后由表征、乖讹和自嘲话语三者关系展开讨论。由三者的关系分析得出：自嘲话语的心理表征和语言表征具有不对称性，直接表现为交际意图与信息意图的不一致性，最终呈现出自嘲语用效果的差异性。第四章运用乖讹论和关联理论阐释自嘲的理解过程。由于乖讹论重在突显事物的不和谐因素，从而改变信息的构建，但在具体分析受众接受和理解自嘲话语上，其解释力不是很具体清晰，而关联理论在分析受众的理解和加工过程，具有很强的解释力。笔者认为，乖讹论和关联理论可以互补，两者相结合能更有效地阐释自嘲的加工理解过程。基于关联理论，在自嘲话语理解过程中，受众理解自嘲需要付出额外的加工努力，同时也获得了由心理期待扑空到情感郁积骤然释放的独特体验。基于以上研究，本文得出以下几点结论：1、自嘲作为一种语用行为，，其突出的语用特点主要表现在以下四点：乖讹性，相对排他性，间接性和逆期待性；其表达方式包括忿断、转移、干涉、降格和口误；其限制条件主要为话语的模糊性和说话人的非真诚性以及命题的相对真实性；其功能表现出多样性。2、在自嘲的产生和理解过程中，自嘲话语的心理表征和语言表征具有不对称性，直接表现为交际意图与信息意图的不一致性。受众推出的交际意图与愿意图是否匹配，将会产生三种结果：1)如果两者完全匹配，则为完全或充分的自嘲效果。2)如果两者部分匹配，则为部分自嘲效果。3）如果两者不匹配，则为交际失败。3、受众在理解自嘲话语事，需要付出额外的加工努力，从而获得额外认知效果，其表现为受众由一种心理期待扑空到情感郁积骤然释放的独特体验。4、自嘲话语经历了一个由外在表现形式不和谐到最终交际和谐的过程，其话语的产生和理解是同步进行的。
[Abstract]:Self mockery, as one of the effective communication tools in life, can regulate the atmosphere of communication, lighten the mental pressure, and can also repair the interpersonal relationship and play a significant role in the social activities. At present, the domestic self mockery is mostly from the angle of social communication and literary appreciation, mainly involving the self mocking communicative function and the literary works. These studies enrich the research results of self mockery and provide valuable material, but there are also shortcomings: these studies focus on self mocking social communication values, ignore the generation and understanding of self mockery. This article aims to use the theory of incongruity, the theory of relevance in the cognitive pragmatic framework of "self mockery". The social value and pragmatic essence of social communication are analyzed, focusing on the pragmatic elements of self mockery and the mechanism of production and understanding. It is intended to open up a new idea for the study of self mocking discourse and to better use and interpret the self mockery discourse.
The full text is divided into four chapters. The first chapter reviews the literature review of self mockery and incongruity theory, focuses on the historical development of the theory of incongruity, and the related models and applications. The second chapter makes a further study of self mockery from the pragmatic perspective, and discusses the definition, classification and restriction conditions of self mockery, and focuses on the discussion of the self mockery of the pragmatic special. The third chapter uses the theory of incongruity to explain the production mechanism of self mockery. This part first introduces the concept of representation, and then discusses the relationship between the three aspects of the representation, the incongruity and the self mocking discourse. From the analysis of the relationship between the three, the psychological and linguistic representations of the self mocking discourse are asymmetrical and are directly represented by the three. The inconsistency between the intention and the information intention shows the difference in the effect of the mockery. The fourth chapter explains the understanding process of self mockery using the theory of incongruity and the theory of relevance. The force is not very specific and clear, and the relevance theory has a strong explanatory power in the analysis of the understanding and processing of the audience. The author thinks that the theory of incongruity and relevance can be complementation, and the combination of the two can more effectively explain the process of self mockery. Based on the theory of relevance, the audience needs to pay for self mockery in the process of self mocking speech understanding. Extra processing effort has also gained a unique experience from psychological expectations to sudden release of emotional stasis.
Based on the above studies, this paper draws the following conclusions: 1, as a pragmatic act, self mockery is characterized by the following four points: incongruity, relative exclusiveness, indirect and anticipatory expectation; its expression includes wrath, transfer, interference, lowering and falsivity, and its limitation is mainly the fuzziness of discourse and The non sincerity of the speaker and the relative authenticity of the propositions; its function shows the diversity of.2. In the process of self mockery, the psychological and linguistic representations of self mocking discourse have asymmetry, which directly shows the inconsistency between the communicative intention and the information intention. Three results will be produced: 1) if the two are fully matched, it is a complete or full self mockery effect.2) if the two are partially matched, it is part of the self mockery effect.3) if the two do not match, it is a communicative failure.3, and the audience needs to pay extra processing effort to understand the self mockery, thus obtaining additional cognitive effect, which is shown to be the audience. A unique experience,.4, from a psychological expectation to a sudden release of emotional depression, has experienced a process of discord from external expression to final communication and harmony, and the production and understanding of its discourse are carried out synchronously.
【学位授予单位】：长沙理工大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2012
【分类号】：H030

【参考文献】