律师代理词中介入资源的顺应性分析
发布时间:2018-06-29 04:06
本文选题:律师代理词 + 介入资源 ; 参考:《语言教学与研究》2011年03期
【摘要】:本文将评价理论和顺应论有机结合,建立了一个介入资源顺应分析模式,用来分析律师代理词中介入资源的使用规律并解释律师如何动态地选择介入资源以顺应语境,最终实现交际目的。研究发现,代理词中使用较多的介入资源有否定、反驳、背书、接纳、承认等资源。而这些介入资源是律师为了顺应法官和听众的接受心理、律师自己的心理动机、法庭言语规范、庭审各方权力关系而做出的语言选择。其中,反驳、接纳、背书、承认多是对心理世界的顺应,否定、接纳、背书多是对社交世界的顺应。但在交际中,律师不会只考虑顺应一种因素,而往往是三种因素共同起作用。此外,在交际中,律师所选择的语言顺应并不是固定不变的,而是随着交际的进展、事态的发展以及交际双方关系的变化随时做出动态的调整。
[Abstract]:This paper combines the theory of evaluation with the theory of adaptation, and sets up a model of adaptation analysis of intervention resources, which is used to analyze the rules of use of intervention resources in lawyers' representation words and to explain how lawyers dynamically choose intervention resources to adapt to the context. Finally, the purpose of communication is achieved. It is found that more intervention resources are negation, rebuttal, endorsement, acceptance, admission and so on. These intervention resources are language choices made by lawyers in order to conform to the acceptance psychology of judges and listeners, lawyers' own psychological motives, court language norms, and power relations between parties in court hearings. Among them, rebuttal, acceptance, endorsement, admission are the adaptation to the psychological world, negation, acceptance and endorsement are mostly the adaptation to the social world. However, in communication, lawyers do not only consider one factor, but often three factors work together. In addition, in communication, the language adaptation chosen by lawyers is not fixed, but with the progress of communication, the development of the situation and the change of the relationship between the two parties to the communication make dynamic adjustment at any time.
【作者单位】: 广东外语外贸大学国际商务英语学院;
【基金】:广东省哲学社会科学“十一五”规划2008年度学科共建项目“基于语料库的法律语言多维分析”(批准号:08GK-03) 广东省“211工程”三期重点项目“全球化背景下的外国语言文学研究”子项目“全球化背景下的法律与非法律机构语篇信息结构和评价功能对比研究”(GDUFS211-1-012)的阶段性研究成果
【分类号】:H052
【共引文献】
相关期刊论文 前10条
1 戚健;浅析英语书评中的评价[J];东莞理工学院学报;2005年02期
2 刘件福;外贸英语信函中的表情功能[J];广东外语外贸大学学报;2004年04期
3 黄莹;;我国政治话语体裁中人际意义的变迁——基于《人民日报》元旦社论的个案研究[J];广东外语外贸大学学报;2006年02期
4 徐s,
本文编号:2080781
本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/wenyilunwen/hanyulw/2080781.html