翻译批评的三种中国古典批评模式

发布时间：2018-07-02 19:59

本文选题：翻译批评 + 中国古典批评模式　；参考：《外语研究》2011年05期

【摘要】：中国古典批评模式主要分为三种:注经式批评、诗话式批评(或范畴式批评)和评点式批评。注经式批评针对的是以《四书》《五经》为主体批评对象的哲学文本,分为两种取向:其一为"我注六经"式的考据取向,其二为"六经注我"式的义理取向。诗话式或范畴式批评与当今所谓的印象主义批评颇为相似,主要通过零星的、随感式的和非系统的评说来进行。评点式批评主要针对小说这种叙事类文学的文本,一般不会被抽离所评点的文本之外,而是附着其上,与被评点的文本形成了一种寄生和被寄生的关系。在翻译批评中,哲学经典文本的翻译批评多为注经式批评;诗歌翻译批评因多采取零星范畴式的批评可与诗话式批评模式比类;小说类叙事文体的翻译批评可以参照评点式批评模式进行。
[Abstract]:There are three types of classical criticism in China: annotated Classical criticism, poetic criticism (or Category criticism) and critical criticism. The textual criticism is aimed at the philosophical text with "four Books" and "five Classics" as the subject of criticism, and can be divided into two orientations: one is the textual research orientation of "I annotate the six Classics" and the other is the righteousness and principle orientation of "the six Classics annotating me". Poetic or categorical criticism is quite similar to today's so-called impressionist criticism, mainly through sporadic, casual and non-systematic comments. Critique criticism is mainly aimed at the text of narrative literature such as novel, which is usually not isolated from the appraised text, but attached to it, forming a parasitic and parasitic relationship with the appraised text. In the translation criticism, the translation criticism of the classic text of philosophy is mostly the annotated classic criticism, and the poetry translation criticism can be compared with the poetic criticism mode because of the sporadic category criticism. The translation criticism of novel narrative style can be carried out according to the critical mode.
【作者单位】：南京大学外国语学院;
【分类号】：H059

【共引文献】