传达符号学与意指符号学之间的相通之处和统一关系
发布时间：2018-08-25 19:57
【摘要】：一些符号学家区别了传达符号学与意指符号学,不同之处主要表现在代码、对象、理论来源、发送者意图等方面。这种区别对于符号化过程和符号学研究方法的探讨确实大有裨益。然而,这种研究很容易走向极端,即只看到二者之间差异,看不到二者的统一之处。本文重点考察了传达符号学与意指符号学在符号形成过程、代码、能指所指关系、文学作品等方面的相通之处和统一关系。笔者发现,符号的传达作用与意指作用不是绝对对立的,而是处于相互依存、彼消此长、不断转换等对立统一关系之中;传达符号学与意指符号学只具方法论上的差异,而在符号学本体论上是统一的,二者紧密地交织于文化之中。
[Abstract]:Some semiotics distinguish communication semiotics from implicative semiotics. The differences are mainly in code, object, theoretical source, sender's intention and so on. This distinction is of great benefit to the study of semiotics and semiotics. However, this kind of research is easy to go to the extreme, that is, only to see the difference between the two, not to see the unity of the two. This paper focuses on the similarities and unified relationships between semiotics and semiotics in the process of symbol formation, code, signifier relation, literary works, etc. The author finds that the communication function and the signifying function of the symbol are not absolutely opposite, but are in the unity of opposites, such as interdependence, elimination of this long character, constant transformation, and so on, and there are only methodological differences between the communication semiotics and the signifying semiotics. But in the semiotics ontology is unified, the two closely intertwined in the culture.
【作者单位】： 常熟理工学院外国语学院;
【基金】：教育部人文社会科学研究基金资助项目“传达符号学与意指符号学比较研究”(09YJC740012) 江苏省2010年度研究生科研创新计划项目“莫里斯符号学思想研究”(CX10B068R) 南京师范大学2010年度优秀博士研究生学位论文培育项目(2010bs0023) 江苏省“青蓝工程”资助项目
【分类号】：H0
本文编号：2203943
[Abstract]:Some semiotics distinguish communication semiotics from implicative semiotics. The differences are mainly in code, object, theoretical source, sender's intention and so on. This distinction is of great benefit to the study of semiotics and semiotics. However, this kind of research is easy to go to the extreme, that is, only to see the difference between the two, not to see the unity of the two. This paper focuses on the similarities and unified relationships between semiotics and semiotics in the process of symbol formation, code, signifier relation, literary works, etc. The author finds that the communication function and the signifying function of the symbol are not absolutely opposite, but are in the unity of opposites, such as interdependence, elimination of this long character, constant transformation, and so on, and there are only methodological differences between the communication semiotics and the signifying semiotics. But in the semiotics ontology is unified, the two closely intertwined in the culture.
【作者单位】： 常熟理工学院外国语学院;
【基金】：教育部人文社会科学研究基金资助项目“传达符号学与意指符号学比较研究”(09YJC740012) 江苏省2010年度研究生科研创新计划项目“莫里斯符号学思想研究”(CX10B068R) 南京师范大学2010年度优秀博士研究生学位论文培育项目(2010bs0023) 江苏省“青蓝工程”资助项目
【分类号】：H0
【相似文献】
相关期刊论文 前5条
1 张良林;胡志红;;传达符号学与意指符号学的差异——洛特曼文化符号学视角[J];俄罗斯文艺;2011年02期
2 程丹;唐丹;;胡适和李大钊在“问题与主义”之争中的相通之处[J];兰州学刊;2006年04期
3 高娟;;小议系统功能语言学派与转换生成语言学派之异同[J];文教资料;2009年14期
4 杨红;;论语篇语用学与语篇语义学的相通之处[J];信阳师范学院学报(哲学社会科学版);2011年04期
5 张良林;胡志红;;论柏拉图与亚里士多德美学思想的相通之处[J];西华师范大学学报(哲学社会科学版);2011年03期
，本文编号：2203943
本文链接：https://www.wllwen.com/wenyilunwen/hanyulw/2203943.html
