汉字词单位性依存名词与中国语对应研究

发布时间：2018-10-20 19:00

【摘要】：本文从语义研究角度研究韩汉语具有词类转化功能的71个单位性依存名词(韩国语35个,汉语36个)。为了便于论述,本文首先对依存名词大致分为两种类型,一是关于物体的依存名词,二是表示动作频率的依存名词。其次,关于物体的依存名词根据功能再细分为表个体的、表集体的、表度量的和表动作次数的单位性依存名词；表示动作次数的依存名词可细分为表单纯性行为次数和重复性行为次数的单位性依存名词。根据上述分类方式研究韩汉语具有词类转化功能的单位性依存名词的异同点。第一章为绪论,主要阐述论文的研究目的、研究的现状及研究方法。第二部分主要是对有关物体的依存名词进行分类,分为表个体、集体、度量三类,并从语义论角度考察了韩汉单位性依存名词的异同点。通过考察我们发现韩国语的“(?)”,“(?)”,“(?)”,“(?)”,“(?)”,“(?)”,“(?)”,“(?)”,“(?)”,“(?)”,“(?)”,“(?)“(?)”,“(?)“(?)”,“(?)“(?)”,“(?)”,“(?)”,“(?)”等依存名词与与之对应的汉语依存名词在用法上是相同的,但韩国语的“(?)”,“(?)”,“(?)”,“(?)”,“(?)”,“(?)”,“(?)”,“(?)”等依存名词在使用范围上比汉语窄,而“(?)”,“(?)”,“(?)”等依存名词在使用范围上比汉语更广,用法也更多种多样。第三部分主要是对表示动作次数的依存名词进行分类,分为表单纯性行为次数和重复性行为次数的单位性依存名词,并考察了韩汉语具有词类转化功能的单位依存名词的异同点。通过考察我们发现,韩国语单位性依存名词“(?)”比汉语与之对应的词语在用法上更为局限,但韩国语的“(?)”,“(?)”等词在用法上与汉语是相同的。最后结论部分主要对分析得出的结论进行总结、概括。
[Abstract]:In this paper, 71 unit dependent nouns (35 in Korean and 36 in Chinese) with the function of part of speech transformation are studied from the perspective of semantic research. In order to be convenient for discussion, the dependency nouns are divided into two types, one is the dependent noun about the object, the other is the dependent noun representing the frequency of action. Secondly, the dependent nouns of objects are subdivided into the unit dependent nouns of individual, collective, table metric and number of actions according to their functions. The dependent nouns representing the number of actions can be subdivided into the unit dependent nouns for the number of simple behaviors and the number of repetitive behaviors. According to the above classification, the similarities and differences of unit dependent nouns with part of speech transformation in Korean and Chinese are studied. The first chapter is the introduction, mainly elaborates the research goal, the research present situation and the research method. In the second part, we classify the dependent nouns of objects into three categories: individual, collective and metric, and examine the similarities and differences of Korean and Chinese unit dependent nouns from the perspective of semantic theory. Through our investigation, we found that the Korean language is "(?)". "(?)" The equivalent dependent noun is the same as the corresponding Chinese dependent noun in usage, but Korean "(?)", "(?)" The term "(?)" is narrower than that of Chinese, and "(?)", "(?)" Isodependency nouns are more widely used and used in a wider range than in Chinese. In the third part, we classify the dependent nouns which represent the number of actions, and divide them into two categories: the number of simple behaviors and the number of repetitive behaviors. The similarities and differences of unit dependent nouns with part of speech transformation in Korean and Chinese are also investigated. Through investigation, we find that the Korean language unit dependency noun "(?)" It is more limited in usage than the corresponding words in Chinese, but "(?)" and "(?)" in Korean. The same words are used in the same way as in Chinese. In the last part, the conclusion of the analysis is summarized.
【学位授予单位】：延边大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2012
【分类号】：H146;H55

【相似文献】