当前位置:主页 > 文艺论文 > 汉语言论文 >

现代汉语因果复句焦点研究

发布时间:2018-10-24 21:26
【摘要】:复句研究一直是现代汉语研究领域的重要内容,焦点问题是近年来语法学家讨论的热点话题,从目前来看,学者们对汉语复句的焦点问题还缺乏全面、系统、深入的研究,本文的研究旨在填补这一空白。可以说,因果复句是汉语复句中比较有代表性的一类,我们希望通过研究因果复句的焦点问题,带动整个汉语复句焦点的研究工作。本文的主要内容如下: 第一章引言部分介绍了因果复句和汉语焦点的研究现状,本文的研究对象、研究意义、研究思路和研究方法,同时对语料做了简要说明。 第二章讨论因果复句中因句焦点的突显,先将因果复句分为因果式因果复句和果因式因果复句,再分别从焦点标记词、焦点结构和句子语气等方面研究因句焦点的突显规律。 第三章探讨因果复句中果句焦点的突显,先将因果复句分为因果式因果复句和果因式因果复句,再分别从焦点标记词、焦点结构和句子语气等方面研究果句焦点的突显规律。 在研究因果复句焦点的过程中,我们使用了一种新的焦点判断方法——添加“否则”分句,即在因果复句后面根据其内容添加“否则”分句,“否则”否的是哪一个分句,那个分句就是因果复句的焦点所在。本文的第四部分,我们对这一方法的理论依据和可行性作了具体分析,并且认为这种方法可以推广用于判断其他些类型的复句的焦点。 第五章以“小句中枢说”为理论依据,分析了小句句义在复句焦点突显中的作用和焦点突显过程中复句句义对小句的影响,我们认为小句句义对复句焦点的突显具有决定作用,无论这个因果复句的句序是因果式还是果因式,因分句和果分句的句义决定了它们是否是复句的焦点。当然,分句是否作为焦点被突显,除了自身的语义因素之外,还要受到联结之后的复句整体句义的影响,在复句焦点突显的过程中,复句句义对小句具有反作用。 第六章对新旧信息和语序对因果复句焦点的影响做了说明,我们认为信息的新旧和复句的句序不会对复句焦点的突显产生根本性的影响。 第七章结语部分我们对本文的研究做了一个全面的概括,同时指出了一些尚未解决的问题。
[Abstract]:The study of complex sentences has always been an important part in the field of modern Chinese research. The focus is a hot topic discussed by grammatical scientists in recent years. At present, scholars lack of comprehensive, systematic and in-depth research on the focus of Chinese complex sentences. The purpose of this paper is to fill this gap. It can be said that causality complex sentence is a representative kind of Chinese complex sentence. We hope to promote the research work of Chinese complex sentence focus by studying the focus of causality complex sentence. The main contents of this paper are as follows: the first chapter introduces the research status quo of causality complex sentence and Chinese focus, the research object, significance, train of thought and research method, and gives a brief description of the corpus. The second chapter discusses the salience of causality sentence focus in causality complex sentence. It divides causality complex sentence into causality complex sentence and fruit causality complex sentence, and then studies the prominent law of causality focus from the following aspects: focus marker, focus structure and sentence mood. The third chapter discusses the salience of the focus of the fruit sentence in the causality complex sentence. Firstly, it divides the causal complex sentence into the causal complex sentence and the fruit causality complex sentence, and then studies the salience law of the fruit sentence focus from the focus marker, the focus structure and the sentence mood, respectively. In studying the focus of causality complex sentences, we use a new focus judgment method by adding "otherwise" clause, that is, adding "otherwise" clause after causality complex sentence, otherwise which clause is not. That clause is the focus of the causal complex. In the fourth part of this paper, we make a concrete analysis of the theoretical basis and feasibility of this method, and think that this method can be extended to judge the focus of other types of complex sentences. The fifth chapter analyzes the function of the meaning of the small sentence in the focus of complex sentence and the influence of the meaning of the complex sentence on the focus of the complex sentence. We think that the meaning of the small sentence plays a decisive role in the highlight of the focus of the complex sentence. Whether the sentence order of the causal complex sentence is causality or effect factor, the sentence meaning of the clause and the fruit clause determines whether they are the focus of the complex sentence. Of course, whether the clause is highlighted as the focus, in addition to its own semantic factors, but also by the link after the overall sentence meaning of the complex sentence, in the process of highlighting the focus of the complex sentence, the meaning of the complex sentence has a reaction to the clause. The sixth chapter explains the influence of new and old information and word order on the focus of causality complex sentence. We think that the sentence order of new and old information and complex sentence will not have a fundamental effect on the prominence of complex sentence focus. In the last part of the chapter, we make a comprehensive summary of the research and point out some unsolved problems.
【学位授予单位】:华中师范大学
【学位级别】:硕士
【学位授予年份】:2012
【分类号】:H146.3

【引证文献】

相关硕士学位论文 前1条

1 杨萍萍;汉语和印尼语因果复句比较及偏误分析[D];福建师范大学;2013年



本文编号:2292602

资料下载
论文发表

本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/wenyilunwen/hanyulw/2292602.html


Copyright(c)文论论文网All Rights Reserved | 网站地图 |

版权申明:资料由用户a49b6***提供,本站仅收录摘要或目录,作者需要删除请E-mail邮箱bigeng88@qq.com