现代汉语反义对立式语气副词的逻辑分析
[Abstract]:The antisense antithetical mood adverb studied in this paper is a kind of antisense compound, which is a direct or indirect modal adverb that expresses unconditional relation in modern Chinese on the logical basis of contradiction or opposition. The author determines the number of antisense antithetical mood adverbs as thirteen and analyzes them as a whole. On this basis, the antisense opposites are divided into two categories: no special semantics and special semantics. This paper examines the semantic and pragmatic features of these two categories of words. In terms of basic semantics, antisense mood adverbs can show unconditional semantics in deep logical semantics, and unconditional semantics are the basic semantics of antisense mood adverbs. This basic semantics has four expressions. In addition, this paper examines the relationship between the basic semantics of antisense mood adverbs and multiple inferences. In the aspect of special semantics, the two kinds of antisense modal adverbs are not completely equal between the non-special semantics and the special semantics. It is in the special semantic differences that the antonym mood adverbs have some limitations in the substitution of each other, and each word has the necessity to exist. The reason why these antisense mood adverbs are different is their own antisense morpheme. In the aspect of special semantics, this paper mainly analyzes the particularity of the morpheme of antisense mood adverbs, the special semantics of antisense mood adverbs with special semantics and the possibility of replacing antisense mood adverbs with each other. This paper makes a detailed analysis of antisense mood adverbs in terms of subjectivity and focus. Its subjectivity can be divided into the following four types: summation, exclusiveness, speculation and concession. Finally, the author analyzes the focus of antisense mood adverbs.
【学位授予单位】:上海师范大学
【学位级别】:硕士
【学位授予年份】:2012
【分类号】:H146
【参考文献】
相关期刊论文 前10条
1 李林蔚;在张力理论视角下网络语言的隐喻浅析[J];长春工业大学学报(社会科学版);2005年03期
2 肖武云;曹群英;;原型范畴理论下的范畴化特征探讨[J];长沙大学学报;2009年04期
3 沈家煊;转指和转喻[J];当代语言学;1999年01期
4 程世林;;论网络语言的隐喻张力[J];经营管理者;2009年19期
5 傅杰;;浅谈反义语素复合词作状语[J];湖北师范学院学报(哲学社会科学版);2006年04期
6 刘善涛;李敏;;副词“反正”的产生和发展[J];汉字文化;2010年02期
7 赖先刚;现代汉语副词的语用义初探[J];乐山师专学报(社会科学版);1996年02期
8 刘文莉;反义语素的类型[J];龙岩师专学报;2001年01期
9 宋振芹;反义词分类的语义学研究[J];南京邮电学院学报(社会科学版);2003年01期
10 汪梅枝;;“反义聚合”定义及性质的再探讨[J];山东社会科学;2006年07期
相关博士学位论文 前4条
1 朱彦;汉语复合词语义构词法研究[D];华东师范大学;2003年
2 齐春红;现代汉语语气副词研究[D];华中师范大学;2006年
3 雷冬平;近代汉语常用双音虚词演变研究及认知分析[D];浙江大学;2006年
4 曾丹;反义复合词形成演变的认知研究[D];浙江大学;2007年
相关硕士学位论文 前7条
1 郭新雨;现代汉语语气副词研究[D];天津师范大学;2003年
2 齐红飞;现代汉语反义合成词研究[D];河北师范大学;2004年
3 王冠;反义语素合成词研究[D];东北师范大学;2006年
4 于丹;“反正”的多角度研究[D];吉林大学;2007年
5 金硕;反义复合词词汇化过程中的语义发展[D];河北师范大学;2007年
6 龚俊恒;现代汉语反义对立式语气副词研究[D];河南大学;2009年
7 徐达松;语气副词“反正”的多角度考察[D];北京语言大学;2009年
,本文编号:2320180
本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/wenyilunwen/hanyulw/2320180.html