论语体与语体变量

发布时间：2018-11-18 21:24

【摘要】：本文以言语活动为依托探讨对语体的本体认识,以及以语体变量为核心的语体研究方法。论文首先以言语活动作为研究的初始概念,论证了语体的性质和本体构成并对语体进行了界定。然后从语体的本体构成出发,提出语体研究的方法主体应该是解释,由于语体是一种复杂现象,解释的相关性问题就应落实在"分解-整合"的可能性上,从而铺垫了提出语体变量概念的必要性。论文认为传统的语体研究因为将语体的形成归因于使用域而不是使用,导致研究遭遇了瓶颈,而语体语法的新进展则在语体与言语活动的联系以及特征分解的研究方法上提供了启示。在此基础上论文集中讨论了"分解-整合"所带来的语体变量的问题,从变量的提取、语体变量与子变量、变量的组配与语体的类型、语体变量与使用域等方面,明确了如何运作语体变量是语体研究在方法上的集中体现。最后从语体变量出发,提出了语体研究的四种范式:解释范式、推绎范式、本体范式和语篇范式,对前两种范式还提供了个案分析。
[Abstract]:Based on speech activity, this paper probes into the Noumenon cognition of the style and the research method of the style with the style variable as the core. Firstly, the paper uses speech activity as the initial concept of the study, demonstrates the nature and ontology of the style and defines the style. Then, starting from the ontological composition of the style, the author puts forward that the method subject of style research should be interpretation. As the style is a complex phenomenon, the relativity of interpretation should be implemented on the possibility of "decomposition-integration". Therefore, the necessity of putting forward the concept of stylistic variables is laid down. The thesis holds that the traditional style research has encountered a bottleneck because it is attributed to the use domain rather than the use. The new development of stylistic grammar provides enlightenment on the relationship between stylistic and speech activities and the research methods of feature decomposition. On this basis, the paper focuses on the problems of style variables brought about by "decomposition-integration", including the extraction of variables, the combination of variables and subvariables, the combination of variables and the type of style, the style variables and the domain of use, and so on. It is clear that how to operate stylistic variables is the concentrated embodiment of stylistic research methods. Finally, from the perspective of stylistic variables, four paradigms of stylistic research are proposed: the explanatory paradigm, the deductive paradigm, the ontological paradigm and the discourse paradigm, and a case study of the first two paradigms is provided.
【作者单位】：复旦大学中文系;
【分类号】：H03

【参考文献】