“去X化”构式研究
发布时间：2018-12-10 07:53
【摘要】：论文考察“去X化”构式中“去”意义的泛化及“去”类词缀性质的合理性,并从句法、语义、语用、英汉比较等方面对“去X化”构式进行研究。 本论文主要分为四个部分： 第一部分,分析“去X化”的内部结构特点。从意义虚化不彻底、定位性、单项高搭配性、粘附性、新生类推潜能强等五个方面对“去”的类词缀性质的合理性进行阐释。对进入“去X化”构式的“X”的音节、词性限制进行分析,同时研究“去X化”与“X化”的关系,分析“去X化”的产生对“X化”的依赖性及其独立性,并阐释从词汇组合规则分析“去X化”层次的不足及“去X化”作为一个构式的合理性。 第二部分,从句法语义角度,分析“去X化”构式主要作为谓语、主语、定语、宾语的句法功能和强式、弱式两种语义特征。对“去”意义的泛化及其泛化的三种主要原因从类推机制、经济原则、语言接触等方面进行描述。 第三部分,从求异心理、趋同心理和反映社会变迁三方面分析“去X化”构式产生的特殊心理认知机制。利用焦点理论,考察“去X化”构式的语用价值并分析其特殊的语体色彩。 第四部分,从意义、功能两方面分析英语词缀“de-”与汉语“去”的异同点及对“去X化”英汉互译进行结构和语言运用方面的比较研究。
[Abstract]:This paper examines the generalization of the meaning of "de-X" and the rationality of the nature of "de-affix" in the construction of "de-X", and studies the construction of "de-X" from the aspects of syntax, semantics, pragmatics, and comparison between English and Chinese. This paper is mainly divided into four parts: the first part, analyzes the internal structure characteristics of "de-X". This paper explains the rationality of the nature of "gone" affix from five aspects: the deficiency of meaning, the orientation, the high collocation of individual items, the adhesion of individual items, and the strong potential of new analogy. This paper analyzes the syllable and part of speech limitation of "X" which enters into the "de-X" construction, studies the relationship between "de-X" and "X", and analyzes the dependence and independence of "de-X" on "X". It also explains the deficiency of the level of "de-X" in the analysis of lexical combination rules and the rationality of "de-X" as a construction. The second part, from the syntactic and semantic point of view, analyzes the syntactic functions, strong and weak semantic features of "de-X" construction as predicate, subject, attributive and object. This paper describes the generalization of the meaning of "deferment" and its three main reasons from the analogy mechanism, economic principles, language contact and so on. In the third part, we analyze the special psychological cognitive mechanism of "de-X" construction from three aspects: seeking for differences, convergence and reflecting social changes. Based on the focus theory, the pragmatic value of the "deX" construction is investigated and its special stylistic color is analyzed. The fourth part analyzes the similarities and differences between the English affix "de-" and "gone" from the aspects of meaning and function, and makes a comparative study on the structure and language use of the English-Chinese translation of "de-X".
【学位授予单位】：华中师范大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2012
【分类号】：H146
本文编号：2370241
[Abstract]:This paper examines the generalization of the meaning of "de-X" and the rationality of the nature of "de-affix" in the construction of "de-X", and studies the construction of "de-X" from the aspects of syntax, semantics, pragmatics, and comparison between English and Chinese. This paper is mainly divided into four parts: the first part, analyzes the internal structure characteristics of "de-X". This paper explains the rationality of the nature of "gone" affix from five aspects: the deficiency of meaning, the orientation, the high collocation of individual items, the adhesion of individual items, and the strong potential of new analogy. This paper analyzes the syllable and part of speech limitation of "X" which enters into the "de-X" construction, studies the relationship between "de-X" and "X", and analyzes the dependence and independence of "de-X" on "X". It also explains the deficiency of the level of "de-X" in the analysis of lexical combination rules and the rationality of "de-X" as a construction. The second part, from the syntactic and semantic point of view, analyzes the syntactic functions, strong and weak semantic features of "de-X" construction as predicate, subject, attributive and object. This paper describes the generalization of the meaning of "deferment" and its three main reasons from the analogy mechanism, economic principles, language contact and so on. In the third part, we analyze the special psychological cognitive mechanism of "de-X" construction from three aspects: seeking for differences, convergence and reflecting social changes. Based on the focus theory, the pragmatic value of the "deX" construction is investigated and its special stylistic color is analyzed. The fourth part analyzes the similarities and differences between the English affix "de-" and "gone" from the aspects of meaning and function, and makes a comparative study on the structure and language use of the English-Chinese translation of "de-X".
【学位授予单位】：华中师范大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2012
【分类号】：H146
【参考文献】
相关期刊论文 前10条
1 朱德熙;现代书面汉语里的虚化动词和名动词 为第一届国际汉语教学讨论会而作[J];北京大学学报(哲学社会科学版);1985年05期
2 彭志斌;;基于因特网语料库的“去××化”构式分析[J];太原城市职业技术学院学报;2011年07期
3 沈家煊;实词虚化的机制──《演化而来的语法》评介[J];当代语言学;1998年03期
4 申延涛;;动词后“上、到、去”的异同及其语素化[J];消费导刊;2009年07期
5 孙艳;现代汉语词缀问题探讨[J];河北师范大学学报(哲学社会科学版);2000年03期
6 郭潮;“化”尾动词的语法特点[J];汉语学习;1982年03期
7 沈孟璎;汉语新的词缀化倾向[J];南京师大学报(社会科学版);1986年04期
8 周立英;王香灵;;“化”缀分析[J];齐齐哈尔师范学院学报(哲学社会科学版);1992年01期
9 胡松柏;;浅谈词尾“化”[J];上饶师专学报(社会科学版);1982年02期
10 何伟渔;语法的静态分析和动态分析[J];上海师范大学学报(哲学社会科学版);1994年03期
相关博士学位论文 前1条
1 尹海良;现代汉语类词缀研究[D];山东大学;2007年
，本文编号：2370241
本文链接：https://www.wllwen.com/wenyilunwen/hanyulw/2370241.html
