汉韩语疑问词对比研究

发布时间：2018-12-11 02:34

【摘要】：本文主要考察、分析了现代汉韩语疑问词在词法、句法、语义等方面的异同。全文共分七个部分。第一章为绪论，简要介绍汉韩语疑问词的归类问题、研究现状及本论文研究对象、研究价值、研究内容与方法，同时对本文所使用的理论、语料进行说明。第二章主要从构词法和构形法两个方面对比考察了汉韩语疑问词在词法方面的特征。第三章用分布分析法对汉韩语疑问词的句式分布、句类分布、位置分布、复现形式、同现形式及句法功能六个方面的异同进行分析，揭示汉韩语在句法方面的共性与个性。同现形式中，汉语疑问词常与疑问词、语气助词、能愿动词、副词、连词、指示词、否定词七种语法形式同现；韩国语疑问词常与疑问词、助词、词尾、体词、谓词、副词、指示词、否定词八种语法形式同现。第四章、第五章考察了汉韩语疑问词的语义特征。疑问词的语义主要分为疑问义和非疑问义。其中，疑问义包括直接疑问与间接疑问；非疑问义可分为非疑指称义与非疑非指义。非疑指称义主要体现在疑问词的虚指、任指、承指、异指、例指、借指六个方面；非疑非指义主要体现在疑问词的反问、感叹、否定、话语标记用法四个方面。四种非疑非指义在汉韩语疑问词中都有体现；而六种非疑指称用法中，，“虚指、任指、异指”在汉韩语中都存在，“承指、例指、借指”三种用法是汉语疑问词所特有的。在疑问词的疑问用法及非疑问用法方面，汉韩语都表现出了不同特点。第六章采用双向对比的方法，对汉韩语疑问词的对应关系进行了考察，并对所出现的对应情况进行了分析、解释。第七章是结论部分，对本文的研究做了总结，并分析了本文的主要创获与不足。
[Abstract]:This paper mainly investigates and analyzes the similarities and differences of interrogative words in modern Chinese and Korean in lexical, syntactic and semantic aspects. The full text is divided into seven parts. The first chapter is the introduction, briefly introduces the classification of Chinese and Korean interrogative words, research status and research object, research value, research content and methods, and at the same time explain the theory and corpus used in this paper. In the second chapter, the lexical features of Chinese and Korean interrogative words are compared from two aspects: word formation and formation. The third chapter analyzes the similarities and differences of sentence pattern distribution, sentence category distribution, location distribution, repetition form, cooccurrence form and syntactic function of Chinese and Korean interrogative words by using distribution analysis, and reveals the commonness and individuality of Chinese and Korean in syntactic aspect. In the form of co-occurrence, Chinese interrogative words often occur in the same grammatical form as interrogative words, mood auxiliary words, willing verbs, adverbs, conjunctions, deixis and negatives. Korean interrogative words often appear in eight grammatical forms: interrogative words, auxiliary words, endwords, body words, predicates, adverbs, deixis and negatives. Chapter four, Chapter five investigates the semantic features of Chinese and Korean interrogative words. The semantics of interrogative words are mainly divided into interrogative meaning and non-interrogative meaning. Among them, interrogative meaning includes direct doubt and indirect doubt; non-interrogative meaning can be divided into non-doubt referential meaning and non-doubt non-referential meaning. The meaning of non-suspect reference is mainly embodied in six aspects of interrogative words such as fictitious finger, Ren finger, bearing finger, different finger and example, while the meaning of non-suspect reference is mainly reflected in four aspects: questioning, exclamation, negation, and the use of discourse markers, while the meaning of non-suspect reference is mainly reflected in four aspects: questioning, exclamation, negation, and the use of discourse markers. Four kinds of non-doubt and non-referential meanings are embodied in Chinese and Korean interrogative words, while among the six non-doubt reference usages, "fictitious reference, any finger, and different finger" exist in Chinese and Korean, and the three usages are unique to Chinese interrogative words Chinese and Korean have different characteristics in interrogative and non-interrogative usage. The sixth chapter uses the two-way contrast method to investigate the corresponding relation of Chinese and Korean interrogative words, and analyzes and explains the corresponding situation. Chapter seven is the conclusion part, which summarizes the research and analyzes the main achievements and shortcomings of this paper.
【学位授予单位】：上海外国语大学
【学位级别】：博士
【学位授予年份】：2012
【分类号】：H55;H146

【参考文献】