汉语非宾格结构的生成机制
发布时间：2019-01-04 16:31
【摘要】：大量的研究表明传统意义上的不及物动词存在明显的内部差异。为了解释这种差异,Perlmutter(1978)提出了著名的的“非宾格动词假说”(TheUnaccusative Hypothesis).此后,语言学家对非宾格动词作了大量的研究,非宾格性成为语言学界研究的热点问题。一些学者(Burzio1986；Belletti1988；Levin和Rappaport1995,2005；Alexiadou2004；黄正德1997,2007；沈阳和Sybesma2012等)针对不同语言对非宾格动词进行了分类,并提出了相应的非宾格动词诊断手段,但这些研究无论在句法还是语义上都存在一些问题。本论文在前人研究的基础上,对非宾格动词进行了重新定义。本文同时对汉语事件结构进行了详细的讨论(状态体、成就体、达成体、活动体),发现汉语非宾格动词属于成就体中的一类,表现了事件状态的变化。基于此特点,本文尝试提出了汉语非宾格结构的诊断手段：能出现在方位倒装句中并且只跟体标记“了”共存的即为非宾格动词。结果表明,此非宾格性测试手段不仅能够很有效的测试汉语非宾格动词,还能够很好的解释汉语一些争议的非宾格动词,进一步解释了汉语非宾格动词的生成机制,验证了非宾格假说的正确性,进而揭示了人类语言的本质。
[Abstract]:A large number of studies have shown that there are obvious internal differences in traditional intransitive verbs. In order to explain the difference, Perlmutter (1978) proposed the famous "unobjective verb hypothesis" (TheUnaccusative Hypothesis). Since then, linguists have done a lot of research on non-object verbs, and non-objectivity has become a hot topic in the field of linguistics. Some scholars (Burzio1986;Belletti1988;Levin and Rappaport1995,2005;Alexiadou2004; Huang Zhengde 1997 / 2007; Shenyang and Sybesma2012, etc.) this paper classifies the unobjective verbs in different languages, and puts forward the corresponding diagnostic methods of the unobjective verbs. However, there are still some problems in the syntactic and semantic aspects of these studies. On the basis of previous studies, this thesis redefines non-object verbs. At the same time, this paper discusses the Chinese event structure in detail (state aspect, achievement aspect, activity aspect). It is found that Chinese non-object verbs belong to the category of achievement aspect and show the change of event state. Based on this feature, this paper attempts to put forward a diagnostic method for Chinese unobjectibles: those that can appear in the orientation inversion and only coexist with the aspect marker "have" are non-object verbs. The results show that this method can not only effectively test the Chinese unobjective verbs, but also explain some controversial unobjective verbs in Chinese, and further explain the formation mechanism of Chinese unobjective verbs. It verifies the validity of the non-objective hypothesis and reveals the nature of human language.
【学位授予单位】：天津师范大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2014
【分类号】：H146
本文编号：2400524
[Abstract]:A large number of studies have shown that there are obvious internal differences in traditional intransitive verbs. In order to explain the difference, Perlmutter (1978) proposed the famous "unobjective verb hypothesis" (TheUnaccusative Hypothesis). Since then, linguists have done a lot of research on non-object verbs, and non-objectivity has become a hot topic in the field of linguistics. Some scholars (Burzio1986;Belletti1988;Levin and Rappaport1995,2005;Alexiadou2004; Huang Zhengde 1997 / 2007; Shenyang and Sybesma2012, etc.) this paper classifies the unobjective verbs in different languages, and puts forward the corresponding diagnostic methods of the unobjective verbs. However, there are still some problems in the syntactic and semantic aspects of these studies. On the basis of previous studies, this thesis redefines non-object verbs. At the same time, this paper discusses the Chinese event structure in detail (state aspect, achievement aspect, activity aspect). It is found that Chinese non-object verbs belong to the category of achievement aspect and show the change of event state. Based on this feature, this paper attempts to put forward a diagnostic method for Chinese unobjectibles: those that can appear in the orientation inversion and only coexist with the aspect marker "have" are non-object verbs. The results show that this method can not only effectively test the Chinese unobjective verbs, but also explain some controversial unobjective verbs in Chinese, and further explain the formation mechanism of Chinese unobjective verbs. It verifies the validity of the non-objective hypothesis and reveals the nature of human language.
【学位授予单位】：天津师范大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2014
【分类号】：H146
【参考文献】
相关期刊论文 前7条
1 唐玉柱;存现动词的非宾格性假设[J];重庆大学学报(社会科学版);2005年04期
2 杨素英;从非宾格动词现象看语义与句法结构之间的关系[J];当代语言学;1999年01期
3 隋娜;王广成;;汉语存现句中动词的非宾格性[J];现代外语;2009年03期
4 刘探宙;;一元非作格动词带宾语现象[J];中国语文;2009年02期
5 黄正德;;汉语动词的题元结构与其句法表现[J];语言科学;2007年04期
6 顾阳;;时态、时制理论与汉语时间参照[J];语言科学;2007年04期
7 潘海华,韩景泉;显性非宾格动词结构的句法研究[J];语言研究;2005年03期
，本文编号：2400524
本文链接：https://www.wllwen.com/wenyilunwen/hanyulw/2400524.html
