《说文解字》木部五十字集释研究
发布时间：2019-03-06 19:18
【摘要】：许慎，东汉著名的古文经学家，不满于当时学人乱释文字，发奋而作《说文解字》。《说文解字》简称《说文》，是我国语言学史上的杰出的著作，历来被奉为圭臬，在文字学、训诂学、语音学、词汇学等领域意义重大。同时，书中保存了大量的古代社会资料，诸如科学、社会制度、医学及社会生产，在考古学中影响不可小觑。 因《说文》的巨大影响，自其成书之日起就引起当时学者的重视。历代对《说文》研究是薪尽火传，研究者《说文》甚多，“说文四大家”崛起，标志着《说文》研究达到了巅峰。与研究者相并生的是大量著作的产生，这些著作涉及《说文》研究的诸多领域，其中以注释《说文》为最多。就已经出版的专门收集《说文》注释的专著而言，如《说文解字诂林》、《说文解字集注》、《说文解字诂林补遗》，这些专注于资料的搜集，失之辨析，沦为资料罗列。针对此，本文就所搜集到的注释进行甄别辨析，以期有所发现。 本文分为如下部分： 第一部分为绪论。是对本文的几点说明。阐述了本文研究的缘起，并对研究范围及方法分别作了说明。 第二部分是《说文解字》及其研究概述。首先是对《说文解字》产生、内容作了简单的介绍。其次是从著作、研究流派等方面对《说文》历代研究的状况作了概述，从中可以了解《说文》研究的大致的脉络。 第三部分是《说文》木部五十字的汇释及释辩，是本文的重点。以《说文》为目，注释为条，，列于目下,对注释辨析，辨析用按语表述。在辨析中，对注释中的合理之处使其进一步地凸显，不合理之处进行探讨，分析产生的原因。对注释持择善者从之，不能确定者则保留意见。同时在本部分借助古文字研究的成果及植物学、医药学的知识，初步探讨了一些名物的命名的依据，试图解决这些名物词命名的缘由或纠正长期流传的某些不当的解释。 第四部分结语部分是总结全文。指出文中有待改进之处，并对若干问题提出笔者的思考。
[Abstract]:Xu Shen, a famous ancient calligrapher in the Eastern Han Dynasty, was dissatisfied with the random interpretation of the characters by the scholars at that time and worked hard to write "Shuowen Jiezi". Shuowen Jiezi for short is an outstanding work in the history of Chinese linguistics, and has always been regarded as a model. It is of great significance in the fields of philology, exegesis, phonetics, lexicology and so on. At the same time, the book contains a large number of ancient social data, such as science, social systems, medicine and social production, in archaeology can not be underestimated. Because of its great influence, scholars have attached great importance to it since it was written. The study of "Shuowen" in previous dynasties is full of salary, and there are many researchers. The rise of "Shuowen four families" indicates that the study of Shuowen has reached its peak. Parallel to the researchers is the emergence of a large number of works, these works related to the study of many fields, of which the commentary is the most. In terms of the monographs that have been published specifically to collect exegesis, such as the exegesis of exegesis, and the addenda of the exegesis of exegesis, these specialize in the collection of data, the analysis of their loss, and the reduction of this into a list of materials. In view of this, this paper discriminates and discriminates the notes collected in order to find out. This paper is divided into the following parts: the first part is the introduction. It is to explain several points of this article. This paper expounds the origin of this study, and explains the scope and method of the research. The second part is "Shuo Wen Jie Zi" and its research summary. The first is to explain the production of the word, the content of a simple introduction. Secondly, from the aspects of works, schools of study and so on, this paper gives an overview of the research situation in the past dynasties, from which we can understand the general context of the study. The third part is the explanation and explanation of the fifty words of the wooden part, which is the focus of this paper. Take Shuo Wen as the purpose and comment as the article, listed in the list, differentiate and analyze the annotation, differentiate and analyze it in notes. In the analysis, the reasonable place in the annotation makes it further prominent, unreasonable place to carry on the discussion, the analysis produces the reason. Those who hold the right to comment, and those who are not certain, have reservations. At the same time, with the help of the research results of ancient Chinese characters and the knowledge of botany and medicine, this part probes into the basis of naming some famous objects, and tries to solve the cause of naming these nomenclature or correct some improper explanations that have been circulated for a long time. The fourth part of the conclusion is a summary of the full text. This paper points out the problems that need to be improved, and puts forward the author's thoughts on some problems.
【学位授予单位】：辽宁大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2012
【分类号】：H161
[Abstract]:Xu Shen, a famous ancient calligrapher in the Eastern Han Dynasty, was dissatisfied with the random interpretation of the characters by the scholars at that time and worked hard to write "Shuowen Jiezi". Shuowen Jiezi for short is an outstanding work in the history of Chinese linguistics, and has always been regarded as a model. It is of great significance in the fields of philology, exegesis, phonetics, lexicology and so on. At the same time, the book contains a large number of ancient social data, such as science, social systems, medicine and social production, in archaeology can not be underestimated. Because of its great influence, scholars have attached great importance to it since it was written. The study of "Shuowen" in previous dynasties is full of salary, and there are many researchers. The rise of "Shuowen four families" indicates that the study of Shuowen has reached its peak. Parallel to the researchers is the emergence of a large number of works, these works related to the study of many fields, of which the commentary is the most. In terms of the monographs that have been published specifically to collect exegesis, such as the exegesis of exegesis, and the addenda of the exegesis of exegesis, these specialize in the collection of data, the analysis of their loss, and the reduction of this into a list of materials. In view of this, this paper discriminates and discriminates the notes collected in order to find out. This paper is divided into the following parts: the first part is the introduction. It is to explain several points of this article. This paper expounds the origin of this study, and explains the scope and method of the research. The second part is "Shuo Wen Jie Zi" and its research summary. The first is to explain the production of the word, the content of a simple introduction. Secondly, from the aspects of works, schools of study and so on, this paper gives an overview of the research situation in the past dynasties, from which we can understand the general context of the study. The third part is the explanation and explanation of the fifty words of the wooden part, which is the focus of this paper. Take Shuo Wen as the purpose and comment as the article, listed in the list, differentiate and analyze the annotation, differentiate and analyze it in notes. In the analysis, the reasonable place in the annotation makes it further prominent, unreasonable place to carry on the discussion, the analysis produces the reason. Those who hold the right to comment, and those who are not certain, have reservations. At the same time, with the help of the research results of ancient Chinese characters and the knowledge of botany and medicine, this part probes into the basis of naming some famous objects, and tries to solve the cause of naming these nomenclature or correct some improper explanations that have been circulated for a long time. The fourth part of the conclusion is a summary of the full text. This paper points out the problems that need to be improved, and puts forward the author's thoughts on some problems.
【学位授予单位】：辽宁大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2012
【分类号】：H161
【相似文献】
相关期刊论文 前10条
1 黄仁tD;;高丽藏本慧苑音义引《说文》的异文问题[J];语言研究;2008年03期
2 宋铁全;;《说文解字注》“三字句”研究[J];江汉大学学报(人文科学版);2009年03期
3 胡晓萍;;《说文解字》反映的古代战争手段[J];周口师范学院学报;2008年03期
4 顾海芳;汉语颜色词的文化分析——关于《说文解字》对青、白、赤、黑的说解[J];沙洋师范高等专科学校学报;2002年04期
5 蔡梦麒;《汉语大字典》引《说文解字》注音辨正[J];古汉语研究;2005年03期
6 张晓s
本文编号：2435820
本文链接：https://www.wllwen.com/wenyilunwen/hanyulw/2435820.html
