韩中让步表现的对比研究
发布时间：2019-06-26 07:46
【摘要】：韩、汉两大语法系统中的诸多让步表现形式对于韩中两种语言的学习者来说既是学习的重点同时也是难点。本文力图通过语用理论中“预设”理论来进行研究,以语言的实际应用为依托,对让步句进行剖析。 第一章中从本体及对比的角度考察了韩中两国让步句的研究现状,发现以往的研究多立足于让步句在宏观系统中的被分类情况,或是从语义及句法的角度对让步复句进行整体的研究,或是单独针对某个让步接续词尾进行讨论,涉及语用方面的深入研究特别是对比研究还较为匮乏,因此从语用角度对两国让步句进行对比分析仍具备一定的价值。 第二章中重点介绍本文研究所依据的理论——“预设理论”的相关概念,分类,指定本文研究所采纳的观点,从而为本文的研究提供了理论支持。 第三章开始正式利用预设理论分别对韩中两国具有代表性的让步表现一一进行讨论。主要围绕预设理论所包含的“预设期待”、“期待否定”、“内含”三方面来剖析让步句在实际语言表达中所体现的特点。 第四章则主要针对第三章的分析结果进行讨论,从命题的虚实；预设期待的出发点；让步句表达的目的及内在的情感；让步复句的前后分句是否构成对比项四方面来进行讨论,得出了韩中让步表现自身的特点以及两种语言的异同点。 最后,结论部分对该论文进行通篇的整理,分析了对比的结果,得出结论。并找出在研究过程中存在的缺点与不足,以期能够在今后的学习中继续对该方面有所研究。
[Abstract]:Many forms of concession in Korean and Chinese grammar systems are both the focus and difficulty of learning for learners of Korean and Chinese languages. This paper tries to study the "presupposition" theory in pragmatic theory and analyze the concession sentences based on the practical application of language. In the first chapter, we investigate the research status of concession sentences between Korea and China from the point of view of ontology and contrast, and find that most of the previous studies are based on the classification of concession sentences in the macro system, either from the semantic and syntactic point of view of the concession complex sentence as a whole, or separately for a concession sequel, involving pragmatic in-depth research, especially the contrastive study is still relatively scarce. Therefore, it is still valuable to make a contrastive analysis of concession sentences between the two countries from a pragmatic point of view. The second chapter focuses on the related concepts and classification of the theory of "presupposition theory", which is the basis of this study, and specifies the viewpoints adopted in this paper, thus providing theoretical support for the research of this paper. The third chapter begins to discuss the representative concession performance of South Korea and China by using presupposition theory. This paper mainly analyzes the characteristics of concession sentences in practical language expression from three aspects: "presupposition expectation", "expectation negation" and "inclusion" contained in presupposition theory. The fourth chapter mainly discusses the analysis results of the third chapter, from the false reality of the proposition; the starting point of presupposition expectation; the purpose and internal emotion of the concession sentence expression; whether the front and rear clauses of the concession complex sentence constitute a contrastive item, and obtains the characteristics of the concession expression itself and the similarities and differences between the two languages. Finally, the conclusion part arranges the whole paper, analyzes the results of comparison, and draws a conclusion. And find out the shortcomings and shortcomings in the research process, in order to continue to study this aspect in the future.
【学位授予单位】：延边大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2012
【分类号】：H146;H55
本文编号：2506036
[Abstract]:Many forms of concession in Korean and Chinese grammar systems are both the focus and difficulty of learning for learners of Korean and Chinese languages. This paper tries to study the "presupposition" theory in pragmatic theory and analyze the concession sentences based on the practical application of language. In the first chapter, we investigate the research status of concession sentences between Korea and China from the point of view of ontology and contrast, and find that most of the previous studies are based on the classification of concession sentences in the macro system, either from the semantic and syntactic point of view of the concession complex sentence as a whole, or separately for a concession sequel, involving pragmatic in-depth research, especially the contrastive study is still relatively scarce. Therefore, it is still valuable to make a contrastive analysis of concession sentences between the two countries from a pragmatic point of view. The second chapter focuses on the related concepts and classification of the theory of "presupposition theory", which is the basis of this study, and specifies the viewpoints adopted in this paper, thus providing theoretical support for the research of this paper. The third chapter begins to discuss the representative concession performance of South Korea and China by using presupposition theory. This paper mainly analyzes the characteristics of concession sentences in practical language expression from three aspects: "presupposition expectation", "expectation negation" and "inclusion" contained in presupposition theory. The fourth chapter mainly discusses the analysis results of the third chapter, from the false reality of the proposition; the starting point of presupposition expectation; the purpose and internal emotion of the concession sentence expression; whether the front and rear clauses of the concession complex sentence constitute a contrastive item, and obtains the characteristics of the concession expression itself and the similarities and differences between the two languages. Finally, the conclusion part arranges the whole paper, analyzes the results of comparison, and draws a conclusion. And find out the shortcomings and shortcomings in the research process, in order to continue to study this aspect in the future.
【学位授予单位】：延边大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2012
【分类号】：H146;H55
【参考文献】
相关期刊论文 前7条
1 孙茂玲;;近十年语用预设研究综述[J];怀化学院学报;2010年08期
2 吴凯风;;“虽然”的语法化探析[J];井冈山学院学报;2006年06期
3 徐阳春,侯友兰;论让步[J];山东师范大学学报(人文社会科学版);2005年01期
4 王跃平;;试析虚拟性让步句的规约隐涵和预设[J];徐州师范大学学报(哲学社会科学版);2007年02期
5 张洪超;刘昌华;;让步复句的预设研究[J];徐州师范大学学报(哲学社会科学版);2007年03期
6 王振来;韩国留学生学习关联词语的偏误分析[J];云南师范大学学报;2005年03期
7 侯书婷;;英汉让步句的对比与翻译[J];华中师范大学研究生学报;2010年04期
相关硕士学位论文 前6条
1 刘谦功;外国学生汉语让步式复句习得研究及教学新思路[D];北京语言文化大学;2000年
2 王彦杰;“宁可”句式的语义选择原则及其语篇否定功能[D];北京语言文化大学;2002年
3 唐凤燕;现代汉语“即使”复句探析[D];暨南大学;2003年
4 刘永红;现代汉语转折复句的逻辑语义分析[D];广西师范大学;2003年
5 凌瑜;让步连词演变及语法功能研究例说[D];浙江大学;2007年
6 毛京京;论语用预设及其话语交际功能[D];东北师范大学;2009年
，本文编号：2506036
本文链接：https://www.wllwen.com/wenyilunwen/hanyulw/2506036.html
