英汉论文中互动元话语对人际意义建构的对比研究

发布时间：2024-06-15 02:13

　　互动元话语因其劝说性和影响力而体现出独特的交互品质。不同于交互元话语,Hyland(2005b)认为互动元话语更注重其对认知命题态度的表达和作者与读者之间的互动,而交互元话语更强调逻辑和语篇的组织。因而,互动元话语常因其善于构建语篇的人际意义并提高读者信任和语篇参与度,而在各类学术语篇中得到了广泛的研究和应用。然而,以往研究多集中于单一语种学术语篇的对比,多语种间对比较少。而且,他们多集中于研究论文的某一部分,缺少综合性的多部分对比研究。研究论文因其独特的IMRD结构(介绍-方法-结果-讨论)而凸显于类型众多的学术语篇。而其方法部分之后的语篇因更接近于研究论文的尾声,常被视为作者赢得读者信任并建立自己学术声誉的最后一次机会,因而会包含更多元话语也更易于研究。并且,对比本族语者的写作相较于第二语言来说,更有助于排除其他影响因素并保证数据的独立性。出于以上因素的考量,本研究集中于三个研究问题。它们分别是英汉研究论文中互动元话语使用差异、造成该差异的原因及其对构建语篇人际意义的影响因素等。为了确保数据的可比性,70篇英汉研究论文(方法后的结构)组成了本研究自建的语料库的主体。总字数共计为33...

【文章页数】：95 页

【学位级别】：硕士

【文章目录】：
Abstract
摘要
Chapter One Introduction
    1.1 Background of the Study
    1.2 Objective of the Study
    1.3 Significance of the Study
    1.4 Organization of the Thesis
Chapter Two Literature Review
    2.1 Interactional Metadiscourse
        2.1.1 An Overview of Metadiscourse
        2.1.2 Issues of Interactional Metadiscourse
        2.1.3 Previous Studies on Interactional Metadiscourse
    2.2 Interpersonal Meaning
        2.2.1 An Overview of Interpersonal Meaning
        2.2.2 Interactional Metadiscourse and Interpersonal Meaning
        2.2.3 Previous Studies on Interpersonal Meaning
    2.3 Research Articles
        2.3.1 Features of Research Articles
        2.3.2 Interpersonal Meaning in Research Articles
        2.3.3 Previous Studies on Research Articles
Chapter Three Theoretical Foundation and Research Methodology
    3.1 Theoretical Foundation
        3.1.1 Theories of Metadiscourse and Interpersonal Meaning
        3.1.2 Analytical Framework
    3.2 Research Methodology
        3.2.1 Corpus Construction
        3.2.2 Data Coding and Analysis
Chapter Four Results and Discussion
    4.1 Difference of Interactional Metadiscourse
        4.1.1 Hedges
        4.1.2 Boosters
        4.1.3 Attitude Markers
        4.1.4 Engagement Markers
        4.1.5 Self-mentions
    4.2 Difference of Metadiscoursal Effect on Interpersonal Meaning
        4.2.1 Projection of Identity
        4.2.2 Involvement with Readers
        4.2.3 Comprehension of Discourse
    4.3 Difference of Influencing Factors on the Construction of Interactional Metadiscourse
        4.3.1 Variation in Communicative Norms
        4.3.2 Variation in Cultural Values
        4.3.3 Variation in Academic Development
Chapter Five Conclusion
    5.1 Major Findings
    5.2 Implications of the Study
    5.3 Limitations and Suggestions
References
Appendix I Marker List of Interactional Metadiscourse
Appendix II Research Articles in the Self-built Corpus
Acknowledgement



本文编号：3994769