清漪园赅春园的园林创作与园林文化

发布时间：2018-04-14 08:42

本文选题：皇家园林 + 园中园　；参考：《天津大学》2015年硕士论文

【摘要】：赅春园位于颐和园(前身清漪园)后山御路西段,始建于乾隆十七年(1752),咸丰十年(1860)被英法联军焚毁,后由于政治、经济等原因未能重修,现仅存遗址。赅春园由清可轩和味闲斋两组院落组成,依山而建,环境幽邃,是一座宗教氛围浓厚的文人园。乾隆皇帝对其十分喜爱,“来必憩斯轩”,共留下98首御制诗文来歌咏此园,具有十分重要的研究价值。在园林设计方面赅春园选址于万寿山山阴处,依岩构轩,蜿蜒曲折,自成天然之趣,为一山地园佳作,体现了乾隆皇帝的园林审美境界。在创作意向方面,赅春园写仿金陵永济寺与镇江金焦二山,全面的反映了乾隆皇帝的造园思想与皇家园林园中园的写仿设计方法。在园林文化方面,赅春园中曾进行过丰富多样的园林活动,包含了深厚的文化内涵,并且赅春园本身在院落格局、单体建筑、植物品类以及点景题名等方面均体现了儒道释等多元文化的相互融合。本文通过文献考证与实地调研相结合的方式,对赅春园进行综合研究。通过三维激光扫描技术对遗址空间信息的采集以及样式雷图档等相关档案文献的记载,深入分析赅春园的园林艺术与设计方法,并在此基础上对其进行复原研究。通过对写仿原型金陵永济寺与镇江金山、焦山进行考证,深挖其历史沿革并复原其平面格局,结合比较分析法,发现赅春园不仅在建筑单体方面以留云阁写仿永济寺观音阁,而是在整体院落格局与园林意境方面对金陵永济寺进行全面的写仿,重新探析了赅春园的具体写仿内容与写仿手法。通过乾隆皇帝御制诗、《陈设册》以及相关档案的记载,对赅春园中的园林活动进行考证,并深挖其背后的文化驱动力,系统分析了赅春园所蕴藏的文化内涵。在推动乾隆时期园林艺术、设计方法与文化内涵的研究以及深化颐和园整体价值认知方面具有重要的意义。
[Abstract]:Located in the west section of Houshan Royal Road in the Summer Palace (formerly Qingyi Garden), it was first built in 1752 and 1860 in 17 years of Qianlong and 10 years of Xianfeng), which was burned down by the British and French coalition forces, but has not been rebuilt due to political, economic and other reasons, and only remains of the site.The garden is composed of Qingke Xuan and Wei Yi Zhai, built according to the mountain, and is a literati garden with a strong religious atmosphere.Emperor Qianlong loved it very much, and left 98 imperial poems and essays to sing this garden, which had very important research value.In the garden design, the Spring Garden is located in the shade of Wanshou Mountain, with its winding and winding nature, which embodies the aesthetic realm of Emperor Qianlong's garden.In terms of creative intention, Chunyuan wrote imitation Jinling Yongji Temple and Zhenjiang Jinjiaoer Mountain, which reflected the thought of Emperor Qianlong and the imitation design method of Royal Garden Garden.In the aspect of garden culture, there have been rich and diverse garden activities in Chunyuan, which contain profound cultural connotations, and the garden itself is in the courtyard structure, single building,The plant category and the title of the scene reflect the fusion of Confucianism, Taoism, Buddhism and other multiculturalism.Through the combination of literature research and field investigation, this paper makes a comprehensive study on Chunyuan.Through the 3D laser scanning technology to collect the space information of the site and the records of the relevant archives such as the style thunder map and so on, this paper deeply analyzes the garden art and the design method of Chun Yuan, and on this basis carries on the research to its restoration.Through the textual research of Jinling Yongji Temple, Zhenjiang Jinshan and Jiaoshan, the historical evolution of Jinling and the restoration of its plane pattern are deeply explored. In combination with the comparative analysis, it is found that not only does the Spring Garden copy the Guanyin Pavilion of Yongji Temple in the aspect of building monomer,But in the whole courtyard pattern and the garden artistic conception aspect carries on the comprehensive writing imitation to the Jinling Yongji Temple, has re-analyzed the Quichun Garden concrete writing imitation content and the writing imitation technique.Through the records of Emperor Qianlong's imperial poems, the book of furnishings and the related archives, this paper makes textual research on the garden activities in Quichun Garden, deeply excavates the cultural driving force behind it, and systematically analyzes the cultural connotation contained in the Garden.It is of great significance in promoting the study of garden art, design method and cultural connotation in Qianlong period and deepening the whole value cognition of the Summer Palace.
【学位授予单位】：天津大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2015
【分类号】：TU986

【相似文献】