撤县（市）设区不同划界模式对城市空间发展的影响研究

发布时间：2018-05-19 23:38

本文选题：撤县(市)设区 + 划界模式　；参考：《苏州科技大学》2017年硕士论文

【摘要】：随着全球化、市场化和分权化的深入,我国城市空间发展处于强烈的重构过程之中,因此城市空间演变与重构的内在机制成为学界研究的重点。同时由于行政区划调整与城乡空间发展密切相关,围绕城市行政区划调整的讨论也引起空前的关注。行政区划调整实质上意味着不同层级政府之间权力变化的过程,从而引发权力作用对象的物质空间不断重构与发展。撤县(市)设区调整的实质可以说是政区行政范围和政府权力的组合调整,城市行政范围的调整通过边界的变动实现,而县(市)级政府与市一级政府之间权力的博弈最终也会体现在边界的调整中。这种调整对城市空间对演化带来了巨大的影响,但人们在研究撤县设区时却往往忽略了边界划分的不同模式选择对城市空间的影响。基于此,本文重点围绕撤县设区的不同划界模式对城市空间发展的影响展开研究。文章将撤县设区归纳总结为三种划界模式:整建制拼合式、整建制包围式、拆分包围式;并演绎推理了不同划界模式下对城市空间发展的影响。研究发现:整建制拼合式下城市的空间形态被彻底颠覆,撤并后城市整体空间结构多由单中心向多中心演变,但撤并县(市)与原市辖区边界空间难以融合,基础设施难以互融互通,导致边界空间被低效浪费,虚假城市化现象凸显;整建制包围式推动中心城区规模快速扩张,但整体空间调整依然受限,中心城区功能升级乏力,边界空间低效浪费,边界效应强化,空间景观品质不佳;拆分包围式助推城市空间由“单中心”向“带型、多组团、网状式”的大都市区空间形态演化,中心城区空间与功能实现优化组合,外围空间品质提升明显,但也容易形成摊大饼式的空间问题。
[Abstract]:With the deepening of globalization, marketization and decentralization, the development of urban space in China is in a strong process of reconstruction, so the internal mechanism of urban space evolution and reconstruction has become the focus of academic research. At the same time, because the adjustment of administrative division is closely related to the development of urban and rural space, the discussion about the adjustment of urban administrative division has aroused unprecedented concern. In essence, the adjustment of administrative divisions means the process of power change among different levels of government, which leads to the constant reconstruction and development of the material space of the objects of power. The essence of the readjustment of the separation of counties (cities) into districts can be said to be the combination adjustment of the administrative scope of administrative districts and government power, and the adjustment of the scope of urban administration can be realized through the change of the boundaries. The game of power between county government and city government will also be reflected in the adjustment of the boundary. This adjustment has a great impact on urban space evolution, but people often ignore the influence of different models of boundary division on urban space. Based on this, this paper focuses on the impact of different demarcation models on urban spatial development. In this paper, three kinds of demarcation models are summed up in the paper: the integration of the whole system, the surrounding of the whole system, the split and encircling, and the deduction of the influence on the development of the urban space under the different demarcation modes. It is found that the spatial form of the whole city is completely subverted, the whole spatial structure of the city evolves from single center to multi-center, but it is difficult to merge the boundary space between the county (city) and the former municipal district. It is difficult for infrastructure to communicate with each other, resulting in inefficient waste of border space, and the phenomenon of false urbanization is highlighted. The whole system encircles the scale of central urban area to expand rapidly, but the overall spatial adjustment is still limited, and the function upgrade of central urban area is weak. The boundary space is inefficient and wasteful, the boundary effect is strengthened, the space landscape quality is not good, the urban space of the split and encircling type is changed from "single center" to "belt type, multi-group, network type", the urban space form evolves from "single center" to "multi-group, network type". The optimization combination of space and function in central urban area can improve the quality of outer space obviously, but it is also easy to form the space problem of big cake.
【学位授予单位】：苏州科技大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2017
【分类号】：TU984.113

【参考文献】