当前位置:主页 > 文艺论文 > 环境艺术论文 >

都江堰市灌县古城景观评价的初步研究

发布时间:2018-06-03 12:35

  本文选题:都江堰灌县古城 + 景观 ; 参考:《四川农业大学》2015年硕士论文


【摘要】:随着社会的发展,生活水平的提高,人们的价值观念也产生了变化。在追求物质生活的同时,人们更大程度的渴望在精神愉悦和审美享受上获得满足,愈加倾向于景观的美化和生态化。在追求景观的空间层次、特色变化的提高的同时,亦着眼于审美评价标准的层面,环境意识显著提高,并且增强了对生态景观质量的要求,所涉及的景观评价便愈加重要。要科学、全面地了解风景名胜区的现状,这样才能对风景名胜区进行开发利用,所以要通过正确的方法对风景名胜区景观进行评价。对风景名胜区的评价和管理,对促进风景名胜区的建设和保护,促进风景名胜区的可持续发展具有十分重要的意义。要结合定量方法及定性方法分析风景名胜的景观价值,对风景名胜区景观价值进行准确的评价,这有利于风景名胜区的监测管理和建设保护,有利于景区规划管理的长期发展。本文通过梳理景观评价相关理论,包括景观生态学相关理论、景观美学相关理论、风景园林工程学基本理论。进而对都江堰灌县古城景观概况介绍,明确了都江堰灌县古城景观特点,揭示了都江堰灌县古城景观存在的一些问题。在讨论了现有国内景观评价体系对都江堰灌县古城景观评价不足的基础上,明确了都江堰灌县古城景观评价体系的基本思路,建立了都江堰灌县古城景观评价指标体系设计准则,确定了影响都江堰灌县古城景观评价的基本指标,选择层次分析法(AHP)作为都江堰灌县古城景观评价方法,从经济效益、视觉印象、规划合理性、公众评价、生态效益、社会的协调性6方面建立了都江堰灌县古城景观评价体系,通过对景观相关专家的调查,确定了层次分析法中都江堰灌县古城景观各指标的权重。利用层次分析法进行了都江堰灌县古城景观评价的评价,提出了都江堰灌县古城景观评价后的改进措施,认为都江堰灌县古城景观构建的方向是保持整体性、原真性、生态性、活力性、艺术性。本文提出了都江堰灌县古城景观进一步完善的措施,包括原汁原味保护、明确都江堰灌县古城的城市功能设置、发展都江堰灌县古城民间传统文化、发动居民参与都江堰灌县古城景观建设、合理配置植物、加强城市周边自然环境保护和修复。以往的景观评价,多倾向于主观的视觉评价,如对景观视觉美学的评价,从景观美学与视觉考虑,少有与时俱进,在人口增长、生态恶化的今天,从生态性、功能性等角度进行深入研究的。本文运用层级分析法相关理论对都江堰灌县古城景观进行评价,通过完善都江堰灌县古城景观评价的指标体系,从而在有效保护都江堰灌县古城景观资源的同时,兼顾对都江堰灌县古城景观环境影响评价的有效性的提高,对于景观管理、建设、保护的实践有重要的指导意义。
[Abstract]:With the development of society and the improvement of living standard, people's values have also changed. In the pursuit of material life at the same time, people desire to a greater extent in the spiritual pleasure and aesthetic enjoyment to obtain satisfaction, more and more tend to landscape beautification and ecology. In the pursuit of the spatial level of the landscape and the improvement of the characteristic changes, but also focusing on the level of aesthetic evaluation standards, environmental awareness has been significantly improved, and the requirements for the quality of ecological landscape have been enhanced, so the landscape evaluation involved has become more and more important. It is necessary to understand the present situation of scenic spots scientifically and comprehensively, so as to develop and utilize scenic spots, so we should evaluate the landscape of scenic spots through correct methods. The evaluation and management of scenic spots is of great significance to promote the construction and protection of scenic spots and promote the sustainable development of scenic spots. It is necessary to analyze the landscape value of scenic spots by combining quantitative and qualitative methods, and to evaluate the landscape value of scenic spots accurately, which is beneficial to the monitoring, management and construction protection of scenic spots and the long-term development of planning and management of scenic spots. This paper combs the related theories of landscape evaluation, including landscape ecology theory, landscape aesthetics theory and landscape architecture engineering theory. Then the landscape of the ancient city of Dujiangyan irrigation county is introduced, the landscape characteristics of the ancient city of Dujiangyan irrigation county are clarified, and some problems existing in the ancient city landscape of Dujiangyan irrigation county are revealed. On the basis of discussing the insufficient evaluation of the existing domestic landscape evaluation system for the ancient city of Dujiangyan Irrigation County, the basic idea of the landscape evaluation system of Dujiangyan Irrigation County is clarified. The design criteria of the evaluation index system of the ancient city landscape in Dujiangyan Irrigation County are established, the basic indexes influencing the landscape evaluation of the ancient city in Dujiangyan Irrigation County are determined, and the AHP (Analytic hierarchy process) is selected as the evaluation method of the ancient city landscape in Dujiangyan Irrigation County. Visual impression, planning rationality, public evaluation, ecological benefit and social coordination six aspects of Dujiangyan Guanxian ancient city landscape evaluation system, through the investigation of landscape related experts, The weight of each index of ancient city landscape in Dujiangyan irrigation county was determined by AHP. The evaluation of the ancient city landscape of Dujiangyan irrigation county is carried out by using the analytic hierarchy process, and the improvement measures after the evaluation of the ancient city landscape of Dujiangyan irrigation county are put forward. It is considered that the direction of the construction of the ancient city landscape of Dujiangyan irrigation county is to maintain the integrity, authenticity and ecology. Vitality, artistry. This paper puts forward some measures to improve the ancient city landscape of Dujiangyan Irrigation County, including the protection of the original flavor, the definition of the urban function of the ancient city of Dujiangyan Irrigation County, and the development of the folk traditional culture of the ancient city of Dujiangyan Irrigation County. To mobilize residents to participate in the construction of the ancient city landscape of Dujiangyan Guanxian, rationally allocate plants, and strengthen the protection and restoration of the natural environment around the city. Previous landscape evaluation tends to subjective visual evaluation, such as the evaluation of landscape visual aesthetics, from the landscape aesthetics and visual considerations, few with the times, in the population growth, ecological deterioration today, from the ecological, The function and so on angle carries on the thorough research. This paper evaluates the ancient city landscape of Dujiangyan Irrigation County by using the relevant theory of analytic hierarchy process, through perfecting the index system of the ancient city landscape evaluation of Dujiangyan Irrigation County, so as to effectively protect the ancient city landscape resources of Dujiangyan Irrigation County at the same time. It is of great significance to improve the effectiveness of landscape environmental impact assessment in Guan County of Dujiangyan County for landscape management, construction and protection.
【学位授予单位】:四川农业大学
【学位级别】:硕士
【学位授予年份】:2015
【分类号】:TU984.2

【相似文献】

相关期刊论文 前10条

1 陈宇;景观评价方法研究[J];室内设计与装修;2005年03期

2 陆晶;陈克安;马晓洁;;声景观评价的依赖因素及内在联系[J];声学技术;2008年06期

3 黄江波;李杰;宋江平;刘尧;;高速公路典型路段景观评价综合模型研究[J];武汉理工大学学报(交通科学与工程版);2009年01期

4 陈飞平;廖为明;;基于问卷调查法的森林声景观评价研究[J];生态经济;2011年01期

5 王文哲;刘敏;梁青;;风景名胜区景观评价方法探析[J];安徽农业科学;2011年19期

6 杨建欣;;基于属性层次模型的肇庆环星湖绿道景观评价体系构建[J];亚热带农业研究;2013年02期

7 周国荫;白新和;;公路环境景观评价初探[J];公路;1991年10期

8 王红;道路的环境景观评价分析[J];重庆交通学院学报;1996年03期

9 赵歆玉;孟文阁;;基于层次分析法的旅游公路景观评价[J];森林工程;2006年05期

10 于卓;杨志发;;高等级公路景观评价指标体系研究[J];西华大学学报(自然科学版);2010年05期

相关会议论文 前1条

1 刘铁冬;;基于GIS和层次分析法的寒区高等级公路景观评价[A];中国风景园林学会2009年会论文集[C];2009年

相关博士学位论文 前1条

1 张捷;菊芋用于寒区盐碱地公路绿化的研究及景观评价[D];东北林业大学;2014年

相关硕士学位论文 前10条

1 杨梅;西安市公园植物群落景观评价研究[D];西北农林科技大学;2015年

2 金会鑫;公众参与下的生态型河流景观评价[D];东北师范大学;2015年

3 吴慧;徐州地区传统自然村与新农村的景观评价对比研究[D];中国矿业大学;2015年

4 刘琳;唐山市主要道路绿地植物调查及景观评价[D];吉林农业大学;2015年

5 杨乔韵;泰安环山路中段景观评价研究[D];山东农业大学;2015年

6 晁文秀;儿童户外活动空间研究[D];浙江农林大学;2015年

7 孙思晗;文化视角下的两岸传统聚落景观评价的对比性研究[D];重庆大学;2015年

8 李文静;都江堰市灌县古城景观评价的初步研究[D];四川农业大学;2015年

9 谢莎;风景道景观评价指标体系研究[D];湖南师范大学;2012年

10 吴凯;景观评价模式研究[D];南京林业大学;2009年



本文编号:1972799

资料下载
论文发表

本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/wenyilunwen/huanjingshejilunwen/1972799.html


Copyright(c)文论论文网All Rights Reserved | 网站地图 |

版权申明:资料由用户dd739***提供,本站仅收录摘要或目录,作者需要删除请E-mail邮箱bigeng88@qq.com