基于城乡互动关系导向下的乡村营建模式研究
[Abstract]:City and country, as two kinds of places of human settlement and living, belong to human living environment. Each of them has its own advantages and disadvantages: the rural areas are mainly engaged in agricultural production, have special natural landscape, abundant natural resources and labor resources, at the same time, there are some obstacles to development, such as lack of advanced technology, underdeveloped productive forces, backward economy, etc. Cities are dominated by industry, commerce and service, with advanced science and technology. They are the gathering places of talents and capital, but there are some problems such as environmental pollution, population pressure and traffic congestion. Along with the process of urbanization construction, there are some disadvantages in rural areas, such as cultural deficiency, deterioration of ecological environment, one side of thousands of villages, and so on. The main reason for these phenomena is the one-sided understanding of the relationship between cities and villages. While the countryside supports the city with agricultural resources, the city also promotes the rural development in different ways, the solution of the rural problem can not be separated from the interaction between the urban and rural areas. Therefore, the article discusses the rural construction problem from the point of view of the urban-rural interaction. Firstly, this paper summarizes that urban and rural areas are equal options for different ways of life by combing the theories of scholars at home and abroad on the relationship between urban and rural areas, and that the two are interrelated, interdependent and interactive. Secondly, on the basis of the analysis of the theory and practice of rural construction, it is pointed out that under the interaction of urban and rural areas, the pluralistic values of rural areas have been re-recognized, and the traditional folk culture has begun to revive. With the support of national funds and policies for rural areas and the gradual improvement of infrastructure, the rural areas will welcome the opportunity of development, and conclude the strategies and methods of rural construction: the industrial development should excavate the local culture, upgrade the rural tourism, According to the local conditions, we should introduce the tertiary industries such as farming, housing and so on, promote the integration of industries, and develop Internet agriculture; The living space should realize the equalization of urban and rural infrastructure, extend the function of building space, protect the rural texture in the ecological environment, excavate the potential rural landscape, and create the landscape value. Then, this thinking is used to verify the Jieya rural transformation project, to build organic tea brand in the industrial development, and to develop the rural tourism cooperative mode industry of the company. In the living space, it is necessary to reform the rammed earth architecture, endow the building with new functions, coordinate with the way of life, create the green landscape in the ecological environment, protect the rural texture, build the landscape teahouse, and create the landscape value. Improve infrastructure and green allocation, public service facilities and the market combined. Finally, it is hoped that the research in this paper can provide a way of development under the consideration of two-way relations in the practice of rural construction in our country. Perhaps the people living in cities and villages in the future are not the so-called urbanites and rural people. They are the people who want to live in the city and the people who want to live in the countryside. Both urban and rural life are worthy of respect, and they should complement each other to achieve common development.
【学位授予单位】:湖北工业大学
【学位级别】:硕士
【学位授予年份】:2017
【分类号】:F323;TU982.29
【参考文献】
相关期刊论文 前10条
1 唐振雄;;乡村景观营造中的景观信息模型(LIM)构建初探——以“无止桥”乡村公益实践为例[J];包装世界;2016年02期
2 尚莹莹;;从“碧山计划”窥探我国艺术介入乡村建设现状[J];美与时代(城市版);2015年08期
3 谢凯;李鸿瑞;;关于郝堂村乡村建造的观察笔记[J];建筑技艺;2015年08期
4 邹怡情;;“文化+艺术+技艺”乡建 碧山计划对乡土遗产保护的启示[J];世界遗产;2015年08期
5 贺勇;;乡村建造,作为一种观照[J];西部人居环境学刊;2015年03期
6 樊新生;李小建;高更和;罗庆;;农户活动空间选择的影响因素及其收入效应——河南省农户调查与实证[J];地理科学;2014年08期
7 何慧丽;程晓蕊;宗世法;;当代新乡村建设运动的实践总结及反思——以开封10年经验为例[J];开放时代;2014年04期
8 王磊;孙君;李昌平;;逆城市化背景下的系统乡建——河南信阳郝堂村建设实践[J];建筑学报;2013年12期
9 颜毓洁;任学文;;日本造村运动对我国新农村建设的启示[J];现代农业;2013年06期
10 戴帅;陆化普;程颖;;上下结合的乡村规划模式研究[J];规划师;2010年01期
相关博士学位论文 前3条
1 曹田;“城乡互构”关系中的设计价值选择与中国乡村实践[D];中央美术学院;2016年
2 黄丽坤;基于文化人类学视角的乡村营建策略与方法研究[D];浙江大学;2015年
3 王新越;我国旅游化与城镇化互动协调发展研究[D];中国海洋大学;2014年
相关硕士学位论文 前3条
1 王镜均;基于新型城乡关系的苏南乡村空间转型与规划对策研究[D];苏州科技学院;2015年
2 张智强;“社区营造”模式下的农村社区更新研究[D];厦门大学;2013年
3 庄光胜;地方自治背景下的乡村建设运动[D];山东大学;2011年
,本文编号:2318309
本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/wenyilunwen/huanjingshejilunwen/2318309.html