图像化时代与文学的后现代性

发布时间：2018-05-03 04:09

本文选题：图像化 + 语言文化　；参考：《吉林大学》2006年硕士论文

【摘要】： 对视觉文化的研究一直都强调“图像转向”,即强调图像本身是一个自足封闭的世界,它不需要指涉意义,自身就是一切,切断了走向语言式深层探索的可能路途。波德里亚也指出图像社会是一个“仿像”的社会,它与现实毫无关系。该理论容易把人引向对图像化时代的误解,即认为图像化时代是完全切断与语言文化的一切关系,是独立自足的。一方面,本文从理论层面探讨了图像化时代的后现代本质——“图像化”,即将一切东西图像化、视觉化。图像化的结果表现为两个主要倾向:第一,消解“语言逻各斯”,代之以“后语言”。同时,把语言的多义性、任意性赋予语言,使它的意义外延。第二,图像化改变关于文学的真实的概念,代之以“超现实”。另一方面,本文从文学实践的角度证明,图像化使文学呈现出不同以往的样貌,即文学的后现代性:(1)文学图像化(2)文学的虚拟游戏(3)文学商品化。对于文学的后现代性表现,国内学者看法不一,有人认为这是文学丧失“自我”的表现,文学在影像的排挤下走向终结。本文指出:图像作为一种多维语言,在本质上并不排斥文学的诗意,影像和文学一样都在寻找人的诗意生存,即人的本真生活。现代图像出现了低质化倾向,这是图像化时代过分强调视觉表象的结果。在图像化时代,文学为影像提供了精神资源和文化动力,把影像带出低质和媚俗的阴影;同时影像也为文学注入活力,使文学获得审美再生。两者互动共融,共同撑起文化的天空。
[Abstract]:The study of visual culture has always emphasized the "image turning", that is, the image itself is a self-contained and closed world, it does not need to refer to meaning, and itself is everything, cutting off the possible way to the deep exploration of language. Baudrillard also pointed out that image society is an "image society", it has nothing to do with reality. This theory can easily lead people to misunderstand the era of image, that is to say, the era of image is completely cut off all relations with language and culture, and it is independent and self-sufficient. On the one hand, this paper discusses the post-modern essence of the image age, that is, everything is visualized and visualized. There are two main tendencies in pictualization: first, to dispel "linguistic logos" and replace it with "post-language". At the same time, the polysemy and arbitrariness of language are given to language to denote its meaning. Secondly, picturesque changes the concept of literary reality and replaces it with surrealism. On the other hand, from the point of view of literary practice, this paper proves that image-oriented literature presents a different appearance than before, that is, the postmodernism of literature: 1) literary imagetization / 2) the virtual game of literature and the commercialization of literature. There are different views on the postmodernity of literature. Some people think that it is the manifestation of literature losing "self", and literature is pushed out of the image to the end. This paper points out that image, as a multi-dimensional language, does not reject the poetic meaning of literature in essence. Image and literature are all looking for the poetic existence of human beings, that is, the real life of human beings. Modern images tend to be of low quality, which is the result of excessive emphasis on visual representation in the image age. In the image age, literature provides the spiritual resources and cultural power for the image, and brings the image out of the shadow of low quality and vulgarity. At the same time, the image also infuses the vitality into the literature and makes the literature obtain aesthetic regeneration. The two interacts and melts together to support the cultural sky together.
【学位授予单位】：吉林大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2006
【分类号】：I022

【引证文献】