新批评反讽及其现代神话
[Abstract]:As a kind of language skill, or as a way of thinking, as a kind of philosophical attitude, the irony has a long history. It is also time for people to sum up the theory. In this course, the new criticism is unproductive. The purpose of this paper is to study the irony in the framework of the overall theory of the new criticism, and to systematically sort out, analyze and criticize the new criticism on the analysis of the irony, especially the analysis of the mechanism of the irony. Their theoretical discussion on irony eventually led to the pursuit of some sort of myth, and the new criticism of the poetry aesthetics is a myth-style state. On the basis of this, this paper intends to make a perspective on the new criticism through the word irony, and to analyze and judge the merits of the new criticism. The first chapter is to investigate the new The new criticism irony is formed on the basis of the transformation of the traditional irony. In this transformation, it has accepted both the influence of the romantic literature and the poetry of the metaphysical school. The influence of modern poetry. The second to fourth chapter is to examine the significance mechanism of the irony of the new criticism. The new critic believes that the irony is the structural principle of the text, and the meaning mechanism contained in this structure principle is of significance. A three-dimensional, meaningful, inclusive, meaningful structure. New critics The pursuit of the myth is at these three levels The second chapter examines the mechanism of the creation of the meaning. The opposite of the different nature of the different levels are put together in the text, and it In the context of the pressure of the context, the significance of its significance to the transformation of the cube and the creation of a new meaning. Under the theoretical framework of the literary ontology, we look at the mechanism of the generation of the meaning, and can find it to pursue. A spatialization effect, which causes the poetics to stress that it is no longer a diachronic, but a synchronic. The new critic thus regards the text as a form of space, which The pursuit of sex, the exclusion of time and history The cause of the causal relationship was rejected and the myth was finally made. Chapter three examines the inclusive mechanism of the meaning. The opposite meaning is united with the imagination and is contained within a whole. Under the theory of the unity of the sense of force, we look into the inclusive mechanism of the meaning. It can be found that it emphasizes the complexity of the text and pursues the most significant state of consciousness, which leads to the emphasis of the poetics not to be beautiful but to be true The back of the meaning of unity is a metaphysical world view, which considers all things to begin with one and the corresponding ones that exist in all things. This idea makes the new critic It's identity. They're right. In the sense of irony, it is subject to the symbolism aesthetics of the time to the romanticism. Chapter 4 examines the mechanism of the structure of the meaning. In the dynamic opposite transformation, the meaning of all the forms of anti-corruption is integrated together to form the general meaning of the poem, that is, the dramatization structure. In the framework of the theory of knowledge, the structure mechanism of the meaning can be found, and it can be found to be one of the ideas. special imitation theory, Through the imitation of the absolute experience, the poem becomes the objective experience and becomes a common object which can be used for communication. It advocates the conduction of experience and the interpretation of the poem. From the point of view, it can be seen that the back of the new criticism implies that A hypothesis is that the language has transparency, and it can convey any experience with accuracy. Chapter 5 examines the ideological nature of the new critical irony. The new critic's pursuit of mythical state, the conservative thought of the new critic, and the other.
【学位授予单位】:北京师范大学
【学位级别】:博士
【学位授予年份】:2007
【分类号】:I06
【相似文献】
相关期刊论文 前10条
1 倪娟娟;;论刘震云小说的反讽艺术[J];文学教育(中);2011年06期
2 左燕茹;;哈金《等待》中的主题反讽意蕴探微[J];时代文学(下半月);2011年07期
3 轩袁祺;;从新批评的复义理论看李商隐的《锦瑟》[J];北方文学(下半月);2010年02期
4 李红梅;;“细读法”的细读——论瑞恰慈对新批评的影响[J];剑南文学(经典教苑);2011年06期
5 张瑞卿;;F.R.利维斯与英美新批评[J];励耘学刊(文学卷);2010年01期
6 傅美莲;;《我是猫》的反讽艺术解读[J];时代文学(下半月);2011年07期
7 张曙光;;罗伯特·洛厄尔与自白派诗歌(一)[J];北方文学;2006年11期
8 何辉斌;;袁可嘉20世纪60年代的艾略特研究[J];汉语言文学研究;2011年02期
9 张中秋;;对狄更斯小说《远大前程》的剖析[J];华章;2011年17期
10 徐畔;;诗学视野中的隐喻认知立体透视[J];外语学刊;2011年04期
相关会议论文 前3条
1 李龙;陈粤;;美学和意识形态的虚妄——浅谈保罗·德曼的“文学性”理论[A];文艺意识形态学说论争集[C];2006年
2 张松建;;文下之文,书中之书:重识袁可嘉“新诗现代化”论述[A];袁可嘉诗歌创作与诗歌理论研讨会论文集[C];2009年
3 黄平;;“文本”与“人”的歧途——“新批评”与八十年代“文学本体论”[A];这就是我们的文学生活——《当代文坛》三十年评论精选(下)[C];2012年
相关重要报纸文章 前10条
1 孙康宜;不要让哈利·波特文学盲目取代传统儿童文学[N];21世纪经济报道;2003年
2 杨仁敬;美国文学与美国文论[N];中华读书报;2003年
3 陈慧;从苏珊·桑塔格的“释义”说开去[N];中华读书报;2004年
4 刘立杆 (诗人、小说家);记忆的河岸:想象与潜听[N];中国图书商报;2003年
5 贺立华;燕卜荪诗学与新批评研究[N];中华读书报;2002年
6 王敖;布鲁姆的“最佳英语诗歌”[N];21世纪经济报道;2006年
7 程一聪 整理;解构,通向更幽深的世界[N];社会科学报;2008年
8 崔卫平;美学乃伦理之母[N];北京日报;2003年
9 齐世荣;不断提高世界史研究水平[N];光明日报;2003年
10 弗雷德里克·詹姆逊;“当前时代的倒退”[N];中华读书报;2002年
相关博士学位论文 前6条
1 臧运峰;新批评反讽及其现代神话[D];北京师范大学;2007年
2 武新军;中国现代文学中的“古典倾向”[D];复旦大学;2004年
3 陈娟;张爱玲与英国文学[D];湖南师范大学;2011年
4 龚敏律;西方反讽诗学与二十世纪中国文学[D];湖南师范大学;2008年
5 肖翠云;行走在文本与文化之间[D];苏州大学;2006年
6 虞又铭;多维的棱镜[D];华东师范大学;2007年
相关硕士学位论文 前10条
1 李建良;新批评在中国的接受研究[D];华中师范大学;2012年
2 杜会鸽;新批评的追索者[D];海南大学;2011年
3 李晓晨;鲁迅与卡夫小说社会批判主题与反讽艺术的比较[D];吉林大学;2010年
4 周春娟;王蒙小说中的反讽及其文化解读[D];中南大学;2007年
5 罗亘;论《故事新编》的反讽艺术及其深层意蕴[D];湖南师范大学;2003年
6 晏利红;语文教学与反讽艺术[D];华中师范大学;2007年
7 唐玲;钱钟书与英美新批评[D];湖南师范大学;2007年
8 李裕欢;《理智与情感》中反讽的文学语用学探究[D];北华大学;2007年
9 张秀娟;解读《蝇王》的反讽艺术[D];辽宁大学;2012年
10 张彩云;“新批评”的历史性研究[D];湘潭大学;2011年
,本文编号:2506525
本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/wenyilunwen/wenxuell/2506525.html