“文学终结论”批判——生态批评视野中的“文学终结”问题

发布时间：2018-01-15 16:13

本文关键词：“文学终结论”批判——生态批评视野中的“文学终结”问题　出处：《学术交流》2009年02期 　论文类型：期刊论文

【摘要】：作为一个理论问题,"文学终结论"的现有阐释呈现出三种向度:一是黑格尔从艺术与"绝对精神"的关系出发得出的艺术终结论;二是米勒等从文学与电子媒介的关系出发得出的文学消亡论;三是朱国华等从文学与权力资本的关系出发得出的文学末日论。在文学发展的现实面前,所谓的"文学终结论"是禁不起推敲的。从生态批评的视角看,文学属于"生命文化",当代文学虽然面临着严重的危机甚至"终结"的危险,但根本原因不在于"绝对精神"的演化、电子媒介的进步或权力资本的转移,而在于生命的危机和自然的终结。文学要走出"终结"的魔咒,实现自救与救赎,就必须与捍卫自然与生命价值的生态运动融为一体。
[Abstract]:As a theoretical problem, the current interpretation of the end of Literature shows three dimensions: first, Hegel's theory of artistic termination derived from the relationship between art and "absolute spirit"; The second is Hans Muller's theory of literary extinction from the relationship between literature and electronic media. Third, Zhu Guohua's theory of literary apocalypse from the relationship between literature and power capital. In the face of the reality of literary development, the so-called "end of literature" cannot afford to be examined, and viewed from the perspective of ecological criticism. Literature belongs to "life culture". Although contemporary literature is faced with the danger of serious crisis or even "end", the fundamental reason is not the evolution of "absolute spirit", the progress of electronic media or the transfer of power capital. But the crisis of life and the end of nature must be integrated with the ecological movement to defend the value of nature and life in order to get out of the curse of "end" and realize self-salvation and salvation.
【作者单位】：烟台大学人文学院;
【分类号】：I06
【正文快照】： “文学终结”是一个荒诞与严肃杂糅的理论问题。一方面虽然面对各种困难,文学依然是当下大众精神生活的重要组成,另一方面“文学终结论”又像“魔咒”一样萦绕在所有关心文学命运的人们的心头,引起了许多学者严肃而认真的关注和回应,这一现象显示出“文学终结”问题的重要性

【参考文献】