他者镜像——斯皮瓦克的《学科之死》与中国文论的主体性

发布时间：2018-01-18 10:38

本文关键词：他者镜像——斯皮瓦克的《学科之死》与中国文论的主体性　出处：《新疆大学学报(哲学人文社会科学版)》2009年02期 　论文类型：期刊论文

【摘要】：斯皮瓦克的《学科之死》在深刻剖析比较文学"垂死"之由的同时,也勾勒出极其理想化的"新生"之路。以《学科之死》为镜,折射出全球化语境中中国文论主体性所面临的双重危机:理论的漂泊和理论的异化。要想从双重危机中突围,一方面要正确认识到自我与他者"何为主体"、"何为参照系",争取在互为主体的基础上抓住时机,提前发问;另一方面,跨学科的文化研究为中国文论的发展提供了有效的理论资源,但同时必须警惕其研究对象过分泛化,始终坚持以文学文本为中心。
[Abstract]:Spivak's "death of discipline", while deeply analyzing the cause of "dying" in comparative literature, also outlines a highly idealized road of "new life", with "death of discipline" as a mirror. It reflects the dual crisis that the subjectivity of Chinese literary theory faces in the context of globalization: the drift of theory and the alienation of theory. In order to break through the double crisis, on the one hand, we must correctly recognize the "what is the subject" between the self and the other. "what is the frame of reference", strive to seize the opportunity on the basis of mutual as the main body, and ask questions in advance; On the other hand, the interdisciplinary cultural research provides an effective theoretical resource for the development of Chinese literary theory, but at the same time, we must guard against the overgeneralization of its research object and always insist on the literary text as the center.
【作者单位】：新疆大学人文学院;
【分类号】：I0-03
【正文快照】： 斯皮瓦克的《学科之死》对美国比较文学的‘·垂死”之由深人分析，并且试图以一种极其理想化的方式重建比较文学“新生”之路。国内有学者对该书的理论框架和主要思想进行过批判性解读，但没有能够以“他者”为镜、站在主体性立场进行深刻的自我反思。事实上，，‘他者”的艰

【参考文献】