当前位置:主页 > 文艺论文 > 艺术理论论文 >

八十年代审美文论批判

发布时间:2018-05-06 01:02

  本文选题:审美 + 审美文论 ; 参考:《河北师范大学》2002年硕士论文


【摘要】: 审美文论是文学阐释模式的一种,它认为文学的基本特性是审美性,文学的基本价值是审美价值。本文对审美文论的批判,目的是理清其产生存在的根源和理论思路,探讨它的理论贡献和社会意义,并从学理上指出其过激之处,这有助于对文学阐释模式做出合理的预测。 第一部分介绍审美文论产生的历史文化语境。它是对“政治功利论”和“认识—反映论”阐释模式的反拨。同时深受20世纪西方文艺观念的影响,也渗透着美学学科的品性。它的哲学基础是西方的生命哲学、存在主义等人本主义思潮。 第二部分理清审美文论的理论思路。它从“文学情感性”、“审美反映论”、“自由的生命表现说”三个方面对“文学是什么”的本质追问进行了回答。在研究视角上,由它律转向自律,重视语言形式的研究。而文学解释学是它的方法论基础。 第三部分探究审美文论的理论贡献和社会意义。新时期人的启蒙促使了文学的觉醒,文学的觉醒又是人的解放的重要组成部分。审美文论从情感性、无功利性、生命性三方面论证文学的自主地位,以作品为研究中心,,文艺学的整体结构发生变化。同时审美话语又是现代性的有机组成部分。 第四部分对审美文论进行反思。它的理论危机有两个表现:一是文学审美无功利性与文学审美功利性之间的矛盾;一是文学审美价值中心论和文学多元价值取向间的矛盾。出现此危机的原因有三个:一是将文学与审美等同;二是西方文化观念的机械移植;三是二元对立的知性思维方式。它也不是对文学的全面解说,新的语境中文化研究才是文艺研究超越审美困境的途径。这说明文学阐释模式的与时俱进性,也告诫我们对文学的解说应保持高度历史理性。
[Abstract]:Aesthetic literary theory is one of the modes of literary interpretation. It holds that the basic characteristic of literature is aesthetic and the basic value of literature is aesthetic value. The purpose of this article is to clarify the origin and theoretical thinking of aesthetic literary theory, to explore its theoretical contribution and social significance, and to point out its excesses in theory, which is helpful to make a reasonable prediction of literary interpretation model. The first part introduces the historical and cultural context of aesthetic literary theory. It is a backwash of the models of "political utilitarianism" and "Cognition-reflection Theory". At the same time, influenced by the western literary ideas in the 20 th century, it also permeates the character of aesthetics. Its philosophical basis is the western philosophy of life, existentialism and other humanism. The second part clarifies the theory of aesthetic literary theory. It answers the essence of what literature is from three aspects: literary emotion, aesthetic reflection theory and free life expression theory. From the perspective of the study, from the other law to self-discipline, pay attention to the study of language forms. Literary hermeneutics is the basis of its methodology. The third part explores the theoretical contribution and social significance of aesthetic literary theory. The enlightenment of people in the new period promotes the awakening of literature, and the awakening of literature is an important part of human liberation. Aesthetic literary theory demonstrates the independent position of literature from three aspects of emotion, non-utilitarianism and life, and takes the works as the research center, and the overall structure of literature and art changes. At the same time, aesthetic discourse is an organic part of modernity. The fourth part reflects on aesthetic literary theory. There are two manifestations of its theoretical crisis: one is the contradiction between literary aesthetic non-utilitarianism and literary aesthetic utilitarianism, the other is the contradiction between literary aesthetic value-centeredness and literary multi-value orientation. There are three reasons for this crisis: one is to equate literature with aesthetics, the other is to transplant the concept of western culture mechanically, and the third is to think in a dualistic way of thinking. It is not a comprehensive explanation of literature, and cultural study in the new context is the way to transcend aesthetic dilemmas. This shows that the mode of literary interpretation keeps pace with the times and warns us that we should maintain a high degree of historical rationality in the interpretation of literature.
【学位授予单位】:河北师范大学
【学位级别】:硕士
【学位授予年份】:2002
【分类号】:I01

【引证文献】

相关硕士学位论文 前2条

1 张昕;“五四”的延续—从“第五代导演”思想看80年代启蒙运动[D];海南大学;2012年

2 李娜;20世纪80年代文学人类本体论研究[D];河北师范大学;2012年



本文编号:1850061

资料下载
论文发表

本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/wenyilunwen/yishull/1850061.html


Copyright(c)文论论文网All Rights Reserved | 网站地图 |

版权申明:资料由用户c6a02***提供,本站仅收录摘要或目录,作者需要删除请E-mail邮箱bigeng88@qq.com