文学的真理性——论柏拉图与亚里士多德的摹仿说

发布时间：2018-05-17 01:40

本文选题：摹仿说 + 柏拉图　；参考：《学习与探索》2011年05期

【摘要】：一直以来,学界就柏拉图和亚里士多德摹仿说的内涵及关系问题未达成共识。从文学与真理性的关系这个角度比较,可以看出两者都从模仿的角度界定文学与真理性的关系,柏拉图认为文学模仿无法做到揭示理式世界中的真与美,亚里士多德则认为文学模仿应是人与自然目的相一致的体现。两者在构建文学无法达到真理这个结论的过程中,都在不同程度上忽视了文学的真理性仅在被展现的过程中才真正地存在。柏拉图与亚里士多德虽然质疑文学在模仿中达到真理的可能性,但并未否定模仿本身以达到文学真理性为前提,文学的确是模仿事件,但同时也是模仿性的再创造事件,文学的真理性能够在模仿中自我表现。
[Abstract]:There has been no consensus on the connotation and relationship between Plato and Aristotle. From the point of view of the relationship between literature and truth, we can see that both of them define the relationship between literature and truth from the angle of imitation. Plato thought that literary imitation could not reveal the truth and beauty in the rational world. Aristotle thought that literary imitation should be the embodiment of human and natural purpose. In the process of constructing the conclusion that literature can not reach truth, both of them ignore the truth of literature only in the process of being displayed. Although Plato and Aristotle questioned the possibility that literature could reach truth in imitation, they did not deny that imitation itself presupposes to achieve literary truth. Literature is indeed an event of imitation, but also an event of re-creation of imitation. The truth of literature can express itself in imitation.
【作者单位】：大连理工大学外国语学院;
【基金】：教育部人文社科研究2009年度一般项目“艾略特哲学语境”(09YA752004)阶段性成果
【分类号】：I02

【参考文献】