论文学史哲学与文学史模式

发布时间：2018-06-05 14:18

本文选题：文学史哲学 + 文学事实　；参考：《四川大学》2005年硕士论文

【摘要】：新时期以来,与文学理论研究和文学批评研究并列的文学史研究越来越受到学者们的重视。文学史哲学,一门关于文学史的哲学,它的地位和作用也越来越受到广大研究者们的关注。文学史哲学的研究取得丰硕成果,但仍有许多不足之处,少有人从文学史著作入手对文学史哲学的指导意义进行研究。本文认为文学史哲学作为哲学,它不是文学史,它不是要简单的讨论历史上遗留下来的文献资料和其他的文学事实何以出现,文学史哲学是要反思以往的文学史著作在选择文学事实,评价具体文学事实时的主观看法和依据,是要研究历史上的文学事实与文学史著作编撰之间的关系,是要研究文学史编撰模式的规律,从而来看编撰文学史的模式是否合理。所有的文学史治史模式都包括两个方面的内涵:一是理论的假设前提,即依赖一种理论上的预设来对文学史事实进行整体把握。对文学史的模式来讲这个先念的前提就是我们所说的文学史哲学的理论指导。人们在编撰文学史之初所掌握的知识结构、对材料史实的主观意识和反思都会体现在这文学史哲学的理论预设之中;二是对文学史事件的整合,通过文学史哲学理论预设的理性智识力量,使文学史偶然事件在思维中统一为一个历时性与逻辑性相结合的过程而成为可理解的,这里原先零散的历史碎片被整合成一个一维连续体并被人的认识能力所理解。这也就是对文学史具体史实的选择,整理和重构。无论承不承认,有意或无意,文学史编撰者总是以某种固有的文学史治史模式为出发点,去运作、编撰文学史。任何文学事实的选择和文学史的编撰都需要有文学史哲学理论观点的指导。其实无论自觉与否,人们在编撰文学史的时候,都运用了一定的理论观念
[Abstract]:Since the new era, the study of literary history, parallel to the study of literary theory and literary criticism, has been paid more and more attention by scholars. Literature history philosophy, a philosophy about literature history, its status and function are paid more and more attention by researchers. The research on the philosophy of the history of literature has made a lot of achievements, but there are still many shortcomings. Few people study the guiding significance of the philosophy of the history of literature from the literary history works. This paper holds that the philosophy of the history of literature is a philosophy, it is not a history of literature. It is not to simply discuss why the literature and other literary facts left over from history appear. The philosophy of literary history is to reflect on the subjective view and basis of the past works on literary history when they choose the literary facts and evaluate the specific literary facts. It is to study the relationship between the historical literary facts and the compilation of literary history works, and to study the pattern of literary history compilation. Therefore, it is reasonable to see whether the mode of compiling the history of literature is reasonable. All the models of managing the history of literature include two aspects: one is the hypothetical premise of the theory, that is, relying on a presupposition in theory to grasp the facts of the history of literature as a whole. To the mode of literary history, the premise of this forethought is the theoretical guidance of the philosophy of literary history. The knowledge structure that people mastered at the beginning of compiling the history of literature, the subjective consciousness and reflection of the historical facts of the material will be reflected in the theoretical presupposition of the philosophy of the history of literature, the second is the integration of the events in the history of literature, Through the rational intellectual power presupposed by the philosophical theory of literary history, the accidental events in literary history are unified into a process of combining diachronic and logic in their thinking and become comprehensible. Here the original piecemeal pieces of history are integrated into a one-dimensional continuum and understood by cognitive power. This is the choice, arrangement and reconstruction of the specific historical facts of literary history. Whether they admit it or not, intentionally or unintentionally, the writers of literary history always take some inherent pattern of literary history as their starting point to operate. Any choice of literary facts and the compilation of literary history need the guidance of philosophical viewpoint of literary history. In fact, whether consciously or not, people in the compilation of literary history, the use of certain theoretical concepts
【学位授予单位】：四川大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2005
【分类号】：I0-02

【引证文献】