浅析人类的艺术创造
发布时间:2018-08-11 11:03
【摘要】:为了强调艺术问题仍是美学研究的核心:也为了解决由于近现代艺术作品难以理解和欣赏而导致艺术的概念难以界定这一难题;更为了进一步深化与建设国内的艺术理论,从而为实践美学的进一步完善提供新的建议,本文探讨了人类的艺术创造这一问题,试图证明创造是人及其艺术的本质,艺术可以用创造加以界定。 本文分五部分进行讨论。前两部分是论述前的准备工作:我们不仅对实践美学中的艺术理论做了简要的回顾,更对其所存在的问题加以了澄清,从而试图从对国内当前艺术理论研究的学术背景和国内外近现代艺术理论尤其是黑格尔的艺术理论的梳理中找到我们观点树立的缘由和依据,并提出人及其艺术的本质是生活意义的创造这一观点。 本文的后三部分对这一观点展开了具体的论证:在第三部分中,我们在马克思主义实践哲学的基础上提出了实践的本质在于创造。为了强调实践的目的性;也为了将精神实践与物质实践不做分割、统一起来,同时强调精神实践的重要性,我们说实践是生活意义的创造。艺术创造便是人的类本质的证据。并且通过对早期人类实践的论述,不仅证明了早期的人类实践便是统一的、尚未分离的生活意义的创造,而且分析了符号从工具这种前符号中派生出来之后,导致了工具实践和符号实践相分离,从而符号这种人类活动的普遍中介是如何通过象征来指引人类的创造活动的。在本文的第四部分中,为了通过艺术符号的创造宋揭示人类创造的特征,也为了将艺术实践同人的各种方式、与人文科学其他部类的活动相分离,我们具体讨论了艺术符号实践的创造性特征,使得艺术是生活意义的创造这一定义更加具体、细致。在第五部分中我们重点讨论了艺术是如何在真理被遮蔽的当今社会之中揭示真理的。 最后,在本文的结论部分中,在对整篇论文总结的基础上,我们将我们的理论同“反映论”进行了对照,指出了用创造来定义艺术的重要意义。并且指出了我们理论研究的目的:通过研究艺术来关注人及其所存在的问题,使艺术理论成为所谓的“诗化哲学”,从而可以如艺术一样揭示真理、构想未来。
[Abstract]:In order to emphasize that the art problem is still the core of aesthetic research, and to solve the problem that the concept of art is difficult to define due to the difficulty of understanding and appreciating modern art works, and to further deepen and construct the domestic art theory, In order to provide new suggestions for the further improvement of practical aesthetics, this paper probes into the problem of human artistic creation, and tries to prove that creation is the essence of man and his art, and that art can be defined by creation. This paper is divided into five parts to discuss. The first two parts are the preparation of the discussion: we not only briefly review the art theory in practical aesthetics, but also clarify its existing problems. In order to find out the reason and the basis of our viewpoint from the academic background of the current art theory research and the combing of the modern art theory at home and abroad, especially Hegel's art theory. And put forward the point of view that the essence of man and his art is the creation of meaning of life. In the third part, we put forward that the essence of practice lies in creation on the basis of Marxist philosophy of practice. In order to emphasize the purpose of practice, to separate the spiritual practice from the material practice, and to emphasize the importance of the spiritual practice, we say that practice is the creation of the meaning of life. Artistic creation is the proof of human nature. And through the exposition of the early human practice, it not only proves that the early human practice is unified, but also analyzes the creation of the meaning of life which has not yet been separated, but also analyzes the derivation of symbols from the former symbols such as tools. It leads to the separation of tool practice and symbolic practice, so how the universal intermediary of symbol to guide human creative activity through symbolism. In the fourth part of this paper, in order to reveal the characteristics of human creation through the creation of artistic symbols, and to separate art practice from the activities of other branches of humanities, This paper discusses the creative characteristics of artistic symbol practice, which makes the definition of art to be the creation of life meaning more specific and meticulous. In the fifth part, we focus on how art reveals truth in today's society where truth is obscured. Finally, in the conclusion part of this paper, on the basis of summarizing the whole paper, we compare our theory with the theory of reflection, and point out the significance of defining art by creation. It also points out the purpose of our theoretical research: to pay attention to people and their existing problems by studying art, and to make art theory become the so-called "poetic philosophy", so as to reveal truth and conceive the future just like art.
【学位授予单位】:山西大学
【学位级别】:硕士
【学位授予年份】:2005
【分类号】:J01
[Abstract]:In order to emphasize that the art problem is still the core of aesthetic research, and to solve the problem that the concept of art is difficult to define due to the difficulty of understanding and appreciating modern art works, and to further deepen and construct the domestic art theory, In order to provide new suggestions for the further improvement of practical aesthetics, this paper probes into the problem of human artistic creation, and tries to prove that creation is the essence of man and his art, and that art can be defined by creation. This paper is divided into five parts to discuss. The first two parts are the preparation of the discussion: we not only briefly review the art theory in practical aesthetics, but also clarify its existing problems. In order to find out the reason and the basis of our viewpoint from the academic background of the current art theory research and the combing of the modern art theory at home and abroad, especially Hegel's art theory. And put forward the point of view that the essence of man and his art is the creation of meaning of life. In the third part, we put forward that the essence of practice lies in creation on the basis of Marxist philosophy of practice. In order to emphasize the purpose of practice, to separate the spiritual practice from the material practice, and to emphasize the importance of the spiritual practice, we say that practice is the creation of the meaning of life. Artistic creation is the proof of human nature. And through the exposition of the early human practice, it not only proves that the early human practice is unified, but also analyzes the creation of the meaning of life which has not yet been separated, but also analyzes the derivation of symbols from the former symbols such as tools. It leads to the separation of tool practice and symbolic practice, so how the universal intermediary of symbol to guide human creative activity through symbolism. In the fourth part of this paper, in order to reveal the characteristics of human creation through the creation of artistic symbols, and to separate art practice from the activities of other branches of humanities, This paper discusses the creative characteristics of artistic symbol practice, which makes the definition of art to be the creation of life meaning more specific and meticulous. In the fifth part, we focus on how art reveals truth in today's society where truth is obscured. Finally, in the conclusion part of this paper, on the basis of summarizing the whole paper, we compare our theory with the theory of reflection, and point out the significance of defining art by creation. It also points out the purpose of our theoretical research: to pay attention to people and their existing problems by studying art, and to make art theory become the so-called "poetic philosophy", so as to reveal truth and conceive the future just like art.
【学位授予单位】:山西大学
【学位级别】:硕士
【学位授予年份】:2005
【分类号】:J01
【参考文献】
相关期刊论文 前10条
1 彭浩东;对能动反映论的再认识[J];淮北煤师院学报(哲学社会科学版);2002年04期
2 刘国章;反映论新探——认识与改造活动过程中的反映问题[J];江淮论坛;2004年02期
3 张渭涛;镜与灯的对话——反映论与物感说的比较[J];理论导刊;2002年04期
4 徐龙福;马克思主义反映论在当代面临的挑战[J];社会科学战线;2003年04期
5 张艺声;新马克思主义文艺学:反映论的新探索——王元骧文学原理的哲学思考之一[J];台州学院学报;2004年02期
6 黄顺铭;“镜子”与“探照灯”辨析——对新闻传播学中反映论与建构论的认识思考[J];现代传播;2003年01期
7 卞敏;列宁《唯批》反映论思想再评价[J];学海;2003年02期
8 李s,
本文编号:2176815
本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/wenyilunwen/yishull/2176815.html