第三条道路:文艺生态研究——论高小康教授近年来的学术研究思想
发布时间：2019-03-02 14:41
【摘要】：正文艺学内部近20年来可谓众声喧哗:中国文论的失语问题、文艺学的边界问题,日常生活审美化的问题、文化研究的合法性问题等令文艺批评界论争不断,热闹非凡。尽管各家莫衷一是,但这些论争总体上可概括为两大派别或曰两大理论间的较量,即建构论与本质论的斗争。此种论争尽管有求真明辨的价值,但因为缺乏有效的对话沟通机制,消磨掉文艺学不少精血和气力,令批评界长期处于内耗的尴
[Abstract]:In the past 20 years, the theory of literature and art can be said to be noisy: the aphasia of Chinese literary theory, the boundary of literature and art, the aestheticization of daily life, the legitimacy of cultural research, and so on, which have caused great controversy in literary and art criticism circles. Although there is no agreement among them, these arguments can be summarized as a contest between two major schools or theories, namely the struggle between constructivism and essentialism. Although this kind of argument has the value of seeking truth and discernment, because of the lack of effective mechanism of dialogue and communication, a lot of painstaking and energetic literary and art studies have been wasted, and the critical circles have been in a long-term awkward situation of internal friction.
【作者单位】： 广东外语外贸大学中文学院;
【基金】：广东省“211工程”三期建设项目“人文学中心建设——比较视野的文学通化研究”子课题(批准号:FDUFS211-2-023)成果
【分类号】：I0
本文编号：2433146
[Abstract]:In the past 20 years, the theory of literature and art can be said to be noisy: the aphasia of Chinese literary theory, the boundary of literature and art, the aestheticization of daily life, the legitimacy of cultural research, and so on, which have caused great controversy in literary and art criticism circles. Although there is no agreement among them, these arguments can be summarized as a contest between two major schools or theories, namely the struggle between constructivism and essentialism. Although this kind of argument has the value of seeking truth and discernment, because of the lack of effective mechanism of dialogue and communication, a lot of painstaking and energetic literary and art studies have been wasted, and the critical circles have been in a long-term awkward situation of internal friction.
【作者单位】： 广东外语外贸大学中文学院;
【基金】：广东省“211工程”三期建设项目“人文学中心建设——比较视野的文学通化研究”子课题(批准号:FDUFS211-2-023)成果
【分类号】：I0
【二级参考文献】
相关期刊论文 前3条
1 高建平;;席勒的审美乌托邦及其现代批判[J];陕西师范大学学报(哲学社会科学版);2006年06期
2 鲁枢元;评所谓“新的美学原则”的崛起——“审美日常生活化”的价值取向析疑[J];文艺争鸣;2004年03期
3 桑农;;“日常生活审美化”论争中的价值问题——兼为“新的美学原则”辩护[J];文艺争鸣;2006年03期
【相似文献】
相关期刊论文 前10条
1 陶海青;;收藏市场火爆 交易平台成重中之重[J];中外文摘;2011年14期
2 李金来;;文学的自身及比较优势的精神生态价值研究[J];青春岁月;2011年18期
3 ;[J];;年期
4 ;[J];;年期
5 ;[J];;年期
6 ;[J];;年期
7 ;[J];;年期
8 ;[J];;年期
9 ;[J];;年期
10 ;[J];;年期
相关重要报纸文章 前1条
1 宫敬才(本报书评人);超越科学与人文两极对立的“第三条道路”[N];中华读书报;2006年
相关硕士学位论文 前2条
1 罗晓东;国内画廊生态研究[D];华南师范大学;2007年
2 李金来;论文学的精神生态价值[D];苏州大学;2009年
，本文编号：2433146
本文链接：https://www.wllwen.com/wenyilunwen/yishull/2433146.html
