分判与会通：中西意象理论的对话
发布时间：2019-05-22 14:28
【摘要】：本文选取具有普适性价值的“意象”范畴进行中西诗学的分判与会通。这一理论探讨,在着眼于完善中西比较诗学理论体系的同时,重在探求中国真正具有现代性特质的文论发展道路。 本文既承认中西意象理论各自的特异性,又寻求二者之间的融通。从本质上讲,中西比较诗学研究本身就意在解决求同存异的难题。因此,本文不追求术语的绝对对应或机械等同,而遵照中西意象理论的本来面貌进行言述,进行求同存异的探讨。一方面在对特异性的体察中找到宏观的会通之点,另一方面发现双方在可会通之点所体现出的具体方式。本文拟从哲学源起、诗学展开、自我超越三个方面展开中西意象理论的分判与会通。 文章首先在致“善”途径、“天人合一”的方式、生存理想的建构三个方面对哲学层面的中西“象”论作异中有同、同中有异的辨析。从哲学之“象”到“审美意象”,中西意象理论沿着不同理路展开。中国传统意象理论依循自然之道达成有限生命的无限开拓;西方意象理论有一个挥之不去的神学基底,充满着神明造物般的创造热情,在主体性的不断放大中寻求经验个体对超验本体的无限趋近。 尽管中西“意象”理论差异显著,但是两者未尝不可有互补短长之处。以缜密的思辨性见长的西学话语对于以直觉体悟为主而缺乏范畴界定与区分的中国诗学来说是合理的师习对象;而中国诗学思维方式和话语模式所成就的蕴藉深远、“心物为一”的“意象”为无法摆脱主客二元对峙、经验与超验分裂的西方意象理论所可望而难及。因此,在透析两者所遭遇的话语困境之后,本文展示了中西意象理论在“会通”的向度上以自我超越为目的的具体努力。英美意象派诗论以西学传统为基点,借源中国古典诗学,开创了西方现代诗坛新风。这一东学西渐意味着中国传统诗学第一次实现了跨越国界的影响,而意象派所体现出的理论勇气和治学心态对于中国现代诗学的建构来说颇值得借鉴。克罗齐直觉主义立场的意象理论是对西方诗学深刻反思的结晶,其为维护意象整一性所作的理论开拓,在某种程度上与中国诗学中对“意象”理想审美形态的建构颇有相通之处。而中国传统意象理论经由“象”到“境”的升华创缔造了作为最高理想的“至境意象”。 本文关于中西意象理论分判与会通的实践,一方面力图还原中国传统文论本原的言说方式,尽量避免中国现代文论研究中的西学思维模式惯性的干扰,力图体现中西诗学之间的平等对话。另一方面在中西诗学异质性与可通约性的比较中,借以明确中国现代文论建构应有的定位方式,寻求中国特色的文论新的发展契机。
[Abstract]:This paper chooses the "image" category with universal value to carry on the separation and association of Chinese and Western poetics. This paper discusses the development of the literary theory with the characteristics of modernity, while focusing on the improvement of the theoretical system of the western comparative poetics. This paper not only recognizes the specific characteristics of the Chinese and Western image theories, but also seeks the fusion between the two. In essence, the study of the comparative poetics of the Chinese and the western is to solve the difficulty of seeking the same Therefore, the article does not pursue the absolute correspondence or the mechanical equivalent of the term, and according to the original face of the Chinese and Western image theory, carry on the exploration of the same. On the one hand, on the one hand, we find the point of the macro-way in the specific body-examination, and on the other hand, we find the specific party that the two sides embody at the point of the meeting. In this paper, it is proposed that the Chinese and Western image theory should be divided into three aspects: the source of philosophy, the development of the poetics and the self-transcendence. On the other hand, the paper first, on the three aspects of "the way of good", "the unity of man and nature", and the construction of the ideal of existence, is the same as that of the "Chinese and Western image of the philosophy level", and the same is different from the other. From the "image" of philosophy to the "aesthetic image", the theory of Chinese and Western images along different lines The traditional image theory of China follows the natural way to achieve the unlimited development of the limited life; the western image theory has a theological base which can not be used, which is full of the creation enthusiasm of the deity creation, and the non-existence of the transcendental body is sought in the continuous enlargement of the subjectivity. In spite of the significant difference in the Chinese and Western "image" theory, both of them have not tasted the same. The short length of Chinese poetics is a rational study object for Chinese poetics, which is based on intuition and lack of category definition and differentiation, and the achievement of the mode of thinking and discourse of Chinese poetics. The image of the western image that can't get rid of the dualistic confrontation, the experience and the transcendental division of the main guest is the image of a "image" that can't get rid of the dualistic confrontation, experience and transcendental division of the main guest. It is expected to be difficult and difficult. Therefore, after the discourse dilemma of both dialysis, this paper presents the purpose of the Chinese and Western image theory to self-transcendence on the degree of the "Huitong". The concrete efforts of the British and American Imagism are based on the traditional Chinese classical poetics, and created the West. This is the first time that the Chinese traditional poetics has realized the influence of the national boundaries, and the theoretical courage and the theory of the Chinese traditional poetics embody the construction of the Chinese modern poetics. It is worth to draw for reference. The image theory of the position of the intuitionism of the west is the crystallization of the deep reflection of the western poetics, which is the theoretical development of maintaining the unity of the image. In a way, the construction of the ideal aesthetic form of the "image" in the Chinese poetics is somewhat different from that of the Chinese poetics. The traditional image theory of China has created the "to the image of the environment" as the highest ideal through the sublimation of the "image" to the "context". The paper, on the one hand, tries to reduce the interference of the inertia of the western mode of thinking in the study of the Chinese traditional literary theory, and tries to reflect the Chinese and Western poetics. On the other hand, on the other hand, in the comparison of the heterogeneity of Chinese and Western poetics and the accessibility of Chinese and Western poetics, it is clear that the Chinese modern literary theory should be constructed with the positioning method, and seek the text of Chinese characteristics
【学位授予单位】：山东师范大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2011
【分类号】：I01
本文编号：2483008
[Abstract]:This paper chooses the "image" category with universal value to carry on the separation and association of Chinese and Western poetics. This paper discusses the development of the literary theory with the characteristics of modernity, while focusing on the improvement of the theoretical system of the western comparative poetics. This paper not only recognizes the specific characteristics of the Chinese and Western image theories, but also seeks the fusion between the two. In essence, the study of the comparative poetics of the Chinese and the western is to solve the difficulty of seeking the same Therefore, the article does not pursue the absolute correspondence or the mechanical equivalent of the term, and according to the original face of the Chinese and Western image theory, carry on the exploration of the same. On the one hand, on the one hand, we find the point of the macro-way in the specific body-examination, and on the other hand, we find the specific party that the two sides embody at the point of the meeting. In this paper, it is proposed that the Chinese and Western image theory should be divided into three aspects: the source of philosophy, the development of the poetics and the self-transcendence. On the other hand, the paper first, on the three aspects of "the way of good", "the unity of man and nature", and the construction of the ideal of existence, is the same as that of the "Chinese and Western image of the philosophy level", and the same is different from the other. From the "image" of philosophy to the "aesthetic image", the theory of Chinese and Western images along different lines The traditional image theory of China follows the natural way to achieve the unlimited development of the limited life; the western image theory has a theological base which can not be used, which is full of the creation enthusiasm of the deity creation, and the non-existence of the transcendental body is sought in the continuous enlargement of the subjectivity. In spite of the significant difference in the Chinese and Western "image" theory, both of them have not tasted the same. The short length of Chinese poetics is a rational study object for Chinese poetics, which is based on intuition and lack of category definition and differentiation, and the achievement of the mode of thinking and discourse of Chinese poetics. The image of the western image that can't get rid of the dualistic confrontation, the experience and the transcendental division of the main guest is the image of a "image" that can't get rid of the dualistic confrontation, experience and transcendental division of the main guest. It is expected to be difficult and difficult. Therefore, after the discourse dilemma of both dialysis, this paper presents the purpose of the Chinese and Western image theory to self-transcendence on the degree of the "Huitong". The concrete efforts of the British and American Imagism are based on the traditional Chinese classical poetics, and created the West. This is the first time that the Chinese traditional poetics has realized the influence of the national boundaries, and the theoretical courage and the theory of the Chinese traditional poetics embody the construction of the Chinese modern poetics. It is worth to draw for reference. The image theory of the position of the intuitionism of the west is the crystallization of the deep reflection of the western poetics, which is the theoretical development of maintaining the unity of the image. In a way, the construction of the ideal aesthetic form of the "image" in the Chinese poetics is somewhat different from that of the Chinese poetics. The traditional image theory of China has created the "to the image of the environment" as the highest ideal through the sublimation of the "image" to the "context". The paper, on the one hand, tries to reduce the interference of the inertia of the western mode of thinking in the study of the Chinese traditional literary theory, and tries to reflect the Chinese and Western poetics. On the other hand, on the other hand, in the comparison of the heterogeneity of Chinese and Western poetics and the accessibility of Chinese and Western poetics, it is clear that the Chinese modern literary theory should be constructed with the positioning method, and seek the text of Chinese characteristics
【学位授予单位】：山东师范大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2011
【分类号】：I01
【参考文献】
相关期刊论文 前10条
1 蒋寅;;原始与会通:“意境”概念的古与今——兼论王国维对“意境”的曲解[J];北京大学学报(哲学社会科学版);2007年03期
2 王一川;通向中国现代性诗学[J];北京师范大学学报(人文社会科学版);2001年03期
3 汪裕雄;传统美学的“意象中心”说[J];江淮论坛;1991年02期
4 王晓朝;绕不过去的柏拉图——希腊语动词eimi与柏拉图的型相论[J];江西社会科学;2004年02期
5 顾颖;康德与黑格尔审美理想辨异[J];南京师大学报(社会科学版);2001年01期
6 朱立元，王文英;试论庄子的言意观[J];上海社会科学院学术季刊;1994年04期
7 陈明华;;跨文化的诗学复古——解析意象派与中国古典诗歌意象艺术的诗学流变[J];肇庆学院学报;2007年01期
8 王玉琴;;“境界”与“意境”——《人间词话》的核心范畴辨析[J];天府新论;2010年04期
9 杰夫·特威切尔 ,张子清;庞德的《华夏集》和意象派诗[J];外国文学评论;1992年01期
10 邓晓芒;;康德的“智性直观”探微[J];文史哲;2006年01期
，本文编号：2483008
本文链接：https://www.wllwen.com/wenyilunwen/yishull/2483008.html
