新时期文学审美本质论的提出与发展研究
发布时间：2019-06-26 16:43
【摘要】：文学审美本质论是20世纪80年代在我国出现的一种新的文学本质观,其产生于新时期主流意识形态淡出和审美本质化开始反思的时期。它从一个不同于以往的角度即审美的角度出发来解析文学的本质,力求把文学的审美属性与意识形态属性结合在一起,提出文学的本质是“审美意识形态”,文学审美本质论是新时期文艺理论发展的重要新成果。 第一章,新时期文学审美本质论产生的社会历史背景。新时期之初,政治对文学粗暴干预的结束给文学的发展创造了相对宽松的社会环境,使文学理论界确立了“文学是人学”的命题。同时,在西方文艺美学、苏联“审美学派”理论及我国自古而来的审美体验传统等理论语境的熏陶下,文学审美本质论应运而生。 第二章,新时期文学审美本质论提出的过程及提出的重要意义。文学审美本质论并非一人一时提出来的,首先是童庆炳先生提出文学的基本特征是审美,接着钱中文先生在此基础上于1984年正式提出文学的本质是“审美意识形态”,并对其内涵进行了分析。文学审美本质论的提出对新时期文艺理论研究的意义是巨大的,它是一代学人集体理论创新的结晶,较之“文艺为政治服务”的口号更能体现文艺自身的发展规律。 第三章,审美本质论理论厚度的增强和审美本质论进入文学理论教材,这两个方面显示了新时期文学审美本质论的初步成熟。在20世纪80年代末,文学审美本质论者继续对文学的审美特征作了进一步地阐述,又对80年代另一重要的学说“审美反映说”进行了深入的阐释,丰富了审美本质论的理论内涵。文学审美本质论从80年代进入一本文学理论教材到90年代进入多本文学理论教材,其理论本身的权威性和普遍性在不断增强。 第四章,文学审美本质论在遭遇并应对全面质疑的过程中继续走向深化。从20世纪90年代末开始,文学审美本质论就遭到了零星的批评。进入到新世纪,则遭到了以董学文、陆贵山为代表的多位学者的质疑。在这全面质疑声中,质疑者的主要观点表现在,认为不能将文学的本质规定为“意识形态”、不能用“审美”涵盖文学所有的本质、“审美意识形态”是“审美”和“意识形态”的简单相加等方面。钱中文、童庆炳、王元骧等审美本质论者积极应对这些质疑,他们重申了“审美意识形态”的逻辑起点是审美意识、“审美”具有巨大的溶解力、“审美意识形态”是一个完整的理论等观点,使其理论观点在应对质疑中继续深化。 第五章,对新时期文学审美本质论进行总体分析评价,对其发展前景进行展望。文学审美本质论,站在马克思主义立场上将文学的审美属性与意识形态属性结合在一起,强调“审美”与“意识形态”的融合,在学理上是具有一定的开创性与独创性的。但其理论本身对审美的过度强调及理论内部结构的松散性,也是不能忽视的缺点。在当前大众文化泛滥、文化研究不断扩张的文化语境中,文学审美本质论应该吸取新的理论主张,秉持一种宏观、开放、多维的态度与方法,才能有更好的发展前景。
[Abstract]:The essence of the aesthetic essence of literature is a new concept of literary essence that appeared in China in the 1980 's, which was born in the period of reflection of the mainstream ideology of the new period and the essence of the aesthetic. It is an important new achievement in the development of literature and art in the new period from a point of view that is different from the previous angle, that is, the aesthetic point of view, and tries to combine the aesthetic attribute of the literature with the ideological attribute. The first chapter, the social history of the essence of the literary aesthetic essence in the new period In the beginning of the new period, the end of the violent intervention of the literature has created a relatively loose social environment for the development of the literature, so that the literary circle of literature has established the "Literature is a human study" At the same time, under the influence of the western literature and art aesthetics, the Soviet "aesthetic school" theory and the traditional aesthetic experience tradition of our country, the essence of the aesthetic essence of literature should be transported On the Process and Proposing of the Essence of the Aesthetic Essence of the Literature in the New Period The essence of the aesthetic essence of literature is not a one-time point. The first is that the basic characteristic of the literature is the aesthetic, and then the Chinese Mr. Chinese, on the basis of this, formally put forward the essence of the literature in 1984 as" the aesthetic ideology "and its connotation. The article analyses the significance of the study of the literary theory in the new period, which is the crystallization of the collective theoretical innovation of a generation of scholars, which is more than the slogan of the "Literature and Art as a Political Service" and reflects the literature and art itself. The third chapter, the enhancement of the theoretical thickness of the aesthetic essence and the theory of the essence of the aesthetics, enter the literary theory teaching material, and the two aspects show the aesthetic of the new era. At the end of the 1980s, the aesthetic essence of literature continued to make a further elaboration on the aesthetic characteristics of the literature, and also made an in-depth interpretation of the other important theoretical "the aesthetic reflection" in the 1980s, and enriched the aesthetics. The essence of the theory of the essence of literature. The essence of the aesthetic essence of literature has entered a literary theory teaching material from the 80 's to the multi-literary theory teaching material in the 1990s, its own authority and the authority of the theory itself. The universality is increasing. In the fourth chapter, the essence of the aesthetic essence of literature is facing and dealing with the comprehensive quality The process of the doubt continues to deepen. From the end of the 1990s, the aesthetic of literature In the new century, the theory of quality has been criticized, and it has been criticized by Dong Xuewen and Lu Guishan. In this all-round question, the main point of view of the question is that the essence of literature cannot be defined as" ideology ", and that" aesthetic "is not used to cover all the essence of literature, and the aesthetic ideology is" aesthetic" and "ideology" , the aesthetic essence of the Chinese, the children, the Wang Yuan and the like have responded positively to these questions. They reiterated that the logical starting point of the "aesthetic ideology" is the aesthetic consciousness, the "aesthetic" has a great dissolution force, the "aesthetic ideology" is a complete theory and so on, so as to make the theoretical view The fifth chapter is to make a general study on the essence of the aesthetic essence of the new era. On the basis of the theory of the essence of the literature, the aesthetic attribute of the literature is combined with the ideological attribute in the Marxist position, and the fusion of the "aesthetic" and the "ideology" is emphasized. It is a kind of groundbreaking and original. But the theory of the theory itself has an over-emphasis on the aesthetic and the internal structure of the theory. In the cultural context of the spread of the current popular culture and the expansion of the culture, the essence of the aesthetic essence of literature should draw on the new theory and hold a macroscopic, open and multi-dimensional attitude.
【学位授予单位】：湖南师范大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2011
【分类号】：I01
本文编号：2506323
[Abstract]:The essence of the aesthetic essence of literature is a new concept of literary essence that appeared in China in the 1980 's, which was born in the period of reflection of the mainstream ideology of the new period and the essence of the aesthetic. It is an important new achievement in the development of literature and art in the new period from a point of view that is different from the previous angle, that is, the aesthetic point of view, and tries to combine the aesthetic attribute of the literature with the ideological attribute. The first chapter, the social history of the essence of the literary aesthetic essence in the new period In the beginning of the new period, the end of the violent intervention of the literature has created a relatively loose social environment for the development of the literature, so that the literary circle of literature has established the "Literature is a human study" At the same time, under the influence of the western literature and art aesthetics, the Soviet "aesthetic school" theory and the traditional aesthetic experience tradition of our country, the essence of the aesthetic essence of literature should be transported On the Process and Proposing of the Essence of the Aesthetic Essence of the Literature in the New Period The essence of the aesthetic essence of literature is not a one-time point. The first is that the basic characteristic of the literature is the aesthetic, and then the Chinese Mr. Chinese, on the basis of this, formally put forward the essence of the literature in 1984 as" the aesthetic ideology "and its connotation. The article analyses the significance of the study of the literary theory in the new period, which is the crystallization of the collective theoretical innovation of a generation of scholars, which is more than the slogan of the "Literature and Art as a Political Service" and reflects the literature and art itself. The third chapter, the enhancement of the theoretical thickness of the aesthetic essence and the theory of the essence of the aesthetics, enter the literary theory teaching material, and the two aspects show the aesthetic of the new era. At the end of the 1980s, the aesthetic essence of literature continued to make a further elaboration on the aesthetic characteristics of the literature, and also made an in-depth interpretation of the other important theoretical "the aesthetic reflection" in the 1980s, and enriched the aesthetics. The essence of the theory of the essence of literature. The essence of the aesthetic essence of literature has entered a literary theory teaching material from the 80 's to the multi-literary theory teaching material in the 1990s, its own authority and the authority of the theory itself. The universality is increasing. In the fourth chapter, the essence of the aesthetic essence of literature is facing and dealing with the comprehensive quality The process of the doubt continues to deepen. From the end of the 1990s, the aesthetic of literature In the new century, the theory of quality has been criticized, and it has been criticized by Dong Xuewen and Lu Guishan. In this all-round question, the main point of view of the question is that the essence of literature cannot be defined as" ideology ", and that" aesthetic "is not used to cover all the essence of literature, and the aesthetic ideology is" aesthetic" and "ideology" , the aesthetic essence of the Chinese, the children, the Wang Yuan and the like have responded positively to these questions. They reiterated that the logical starting point of the "aesthetic ideology" is the aesthetic consciousness, the "aesthetic" has a great dissolution force, the "aesthetic ideology" is a complete theory and so on, so as to make the theoretical view The fifth chapter is to make a general study on the essence of the aesthetic essence of the new era. On the basis of the theory of the essence of the literature, the aesthetic attribute of the literature is combined with the ideological attribute in the Marxist position, and the fusion of the "aesthetic" and the "ideology" is emphasized. It is a kind of groundbreaking and original. But the theory of the theory itself has an over-emphasis on the aesthetic and the internal structure of the theory. In the cultural context of the spread of the current popular culture and the expansion of the culture, the essence of the aesthetic essence of literature should draw on the new theory and hold a macroscopic, open and multi-dimensional attitude.
【学位授予单位】：湖南师范大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2011
【分类号】：I01
【参考文献】
相关期刊论文 前10条
1 张亚骥;;文学“审美意识形态”论的发生、发展及论争[J];合肥师范学院学报;2009年01期
2 刘锋杰;;“文学是审美意识形态”观点之质疑[J];安徽师范大学学报(人文社会科学版);2008年02期
3 高磊;;文艺本质:是意识形态的还是意识形式的?[J];安徽师范大学学报(人文社会科学版);2008年02期
4 董学文;文学本质界说考论——以“审美”与“意识形态”关系为中心[J];北京大学学报(哲学社会科学版);2005年05期
5 童庆炳,陈雪虎;百年中国文学理论发展之省思[J];北京师范大学学报(社会科学版);1999年02期
6 谭善明;;文艺与意识形态的张力——中西马克思主义文论意识形态观念比较[J];长春工业大学学报(社会科学版);2008年01期
7 董学文;陈春敏;;略论文学与意识形态之关系——从马克思的“意识形态”观谈起[J];湖南文理学院学报(社会科学版);2008年01期
8 张默然;;“审美意识形态论”合法性的历史生成[J];重庆广播电视大学学报;2010年04期
9 黎风;;文学变革中的不变法则——再说马克思主义审美意识形态理论[J];当代文坛;2009年06期
10 冯宪光;;文学审美意识形态论的互文性理论结构[J];当代文坛;2010年05期
，本文编号：2506323
本文链接：https://www.wllwen.com/wenyilunwen/yishull/2506323.html
