论测试辩论的理性逻辑与累进方法

发布时间：2018-02-12 03:09

本文关键词： 测试辩论理性逻辑图尔明模型累进辩论　出处：《外国语(上海外国语大学学报)》2012年04期 　论文类型：期刊论文

【摘要】：本文首先分析了解释辩论(IA)、以证据为中心的设计(ECD)和测试使用辩论(AUA)这三个主要测试辩论模型的逻辑机制,发现三个模型存在类似的逻辑问题:构成要素的概念名不符实、推理过程自相矛盾且无限循环。与图尔明模型对比分析后,进一步发现逻辑问题都是因为替换了图尔明反驳的概念并修改了模型的逻辑结构引起的。为了解决测试辩论的逻辑问题,同时克服理性辩论难以处理复杂数据的局限性,本文提出了一个将科学研究与理性辩论相结合的测试辩论模型——累进辩论,一方面强调在理性辩论无法顺利进行时通过统计分析产生更有说服力的新证据,另一方面强调通过模型的循环和递归使用解决层级嵌套的辩论问题。
[Abstract]:This paper first analyzes the logical mechanism of the three main test debate models, namely, the explanation debate, the evidence-centered design (ECD) and the test use debate (AUAA). It is found that the three models have similar logic problems: the concept of the constituent elements is not worthy of the name. The reasoning process is contradictory and infinite. It is further found that the logical problems are caused by replacing the concept of Turmin's rebuttal and modifying the logical structure of the model... in order to solve the logical problems of the test debate and to overcome the limitations of the rational debate's difficulty in dealing with complex data, This paper presents a test debate model, progressive debate, which combines scientific research with rational debate. On the one hand, it emphasizes that statistical analysis can produce more convincing new evidence when rational debate cannot proceed smoothly. On the other hand, it emphasizes solving the problem of hierarchical nesting by loop and recursion of models.
【作者单位】：湖南师范大学外国语学院;
【基金】：湖南省哲学社会科学基金项目“语言理解能力测试的命题质量控制研究”(项目编号09YBB289)的阶段性研究成果
【分类号】：TP391.1;H019

【参考文献】