新HSK与新TOCFL比较研究

发布时间：2018-03-06 17:16

本文选题：新HSK　切入点：新TOCFL　出处：《暨南大学》2015年硕士论文　论文类型：学位论文

【摘要】：本文以《欧洲语言共同参考框架》(以下简称CEF)为基准对新汉语水平考试(以下简称:新HSK)和台湾新版华语文能力测验(以下简称:新TOCFL)进行比较研究。研究发现新HSK和新TOCFL作为海峡两岸最为权威的汉语水平测试,虽同以CEF为参照划分考试等级,并且两项测试的六个等级均与CEF的六个等级(A1、A2、B1、B2、C1、C2)一一对应,但是二者之间却不存在一一对应关系。本文通过对新HSK和新TOCFL的考试大纲、样卷试题和留学生实际施测成绩进行对比分析,验证了新HSK五级与新TOCFL高阶级的实际对应关系。此外,还根据两项测试的对比分析结果为今后的汉语水平测试提供改进建议:第一,制订汉语水平测试统一等级标准;第二,均衡汉语水平测试各等级词汇量之间的差距;第三,多采用贴近生活的材料对考生进行测试。
[Abstract]:Based on the Common reference Framework of European languages (CEF), this paper makes a comparative study of the New Chinese proficiency Test (HSK) and the New Chinese proficiency Test of Taiwan (hereinafter referred to as New TOCFL). New HSK and New TOCFL are the most authoritative Chinese proficiency tests on both sides of the Taiwan Strait. Although the test grades are divided according to CEF, and the six grades of the two tests correspond to the six grades of CEF (A1A2A2B1B2B2C1C2), there is no one-to-one correspondence between them. This paper passes the syllabus of the new HSK and the new TOCFL. The comparison and analysis between the sample test questions and the actual test results of foreign students verify the actual corresponding relationship between the new HSK five level and the new TOCFL high class. According to the results of the comparative analysis of the two tests, some suggestions are provided for the improvement of the Chinese proficiency test in the future: first, to formulate a unified standard for the Chinese proficiency test; second, to balance the gap between the vocabulary of the different levels of Chinese proficiency test; third, to balance the gap between the vocabulary of the different levels of the Chinese proficiency test; Use materials close to life to test candidates.
【学位授予单位】：暨南大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2015
【分类号】：H195

【相似文献】