华文作文结构标准构建研究

发布时间：2018-03-13 06:45

本文选题：华文　切入点：作文　出处：《暨南大学》2015年硕士论文　论文类型：学位论文

【摘要】：前人关于汉语作文结构标准的研究成果较为丰富,但科学性、一致性和可操作性存在不足。本文在归纳、整理前人相关成果的基础上,研制出一套服务于华文作文水平测试的华文作文结构标准,该标准包含五个一级指标,即“部件完整”“层次清楚”“顺序合理”“详略得当”“连贯衔接”五项标准;在此基础上,文章对五个一级指标进行了细化,拟定出若干二级结构标准,并举例阐释。为了验证本人所拟定的华文作文结构标准,我们用等距离抽样的方法,从暨南大学华文教育研究院华文写作测试研制组全球华文作文预测试作文中抽出了90份同题华语看图作文《今天没有考好》,由两位评分员对其做了整体评分和结构单项评分(含5个结构分),并运用统计学中多元回归和差异性检验的方法,对本文制定的华文作文标准进行验证。研究发现,(1)两位评分员所评的作文整体分和结构分之间存在显著相关性,在一定程度上证明本文制定的华文作文结构标准成立;同时发现,在五项华文作文结构标准中,“部件完整”“顺序合理”是影响作文总分的重要因素。(2)通过对两位评分员差异性检验分析,发现除了在“详略得当”这项标准上存在差异性外,其他四项华文结构标准均不存在差异性,说明这一条结构标准不易把握,需要进一步研究。
[Abstract]:The previous researches on the standard of Chinese composition structure are abundant, but they are not scientific, consistent and operable. A set of Chinese composition structural standards serving for the test of Chinese composition proficiency has been developed. The standard includes five first-level indicators, namely, "complete parts", "clear hierarchy", "reasonable order", "slightly appropriate" and "coherent cohesion"; on the basis of this, the following five criteria are proposed: "complete parts", "clear levels", "reasonable order" and "coherent cohesion". In this paper, five primary indexes are refined, several secondary structure standards are worked out, and some examples are given. In order to verify the Chinese composition structure standard developed by me, we use the method of equidistant sampling. From the Chinese writing test group of Jinan University Institute of Chinese Education, 90 compositions of the Global Chinese composition Prediction Test Group were drawn out from the global Chinese composition prediction test group. "No good Today", and two graders scored and summed up the composition. The single item score (including 5 structural scores, and the method of multivariate regression and difference test in statistics) were used. It is found that there is a significant correlation between the overall score and the structural score of the composition assessed by the two raters, which to some extent proves that the structural standard of the Chinese composition established in this paper holds true; At the same time, it is found that "complete parts" and "reasonable order" are the important factors influencing the total score of the composition in the five Chinese composition structural standards. It is found that there are no differences in the other four Chinese structural standards except for the criterion of "appropriate detail", which indicates that this standard is difficult to grasp and needs further study.
【学位授予单位】：暨南大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2015
【分类号】：H195

【相似文献】