“涉及”与“涉及到”的对比研究

发布时间：2018-03-25 00:05

  本文选题：涉及　切入点：涉及到　出处：《北京大学》2013年硕士论文

【摘要】：本文通过对北京大学汉语语言学研究中心现代汉语语料库（CCL语料库）中相关语料的统计与分析，对“涉及”与“涉及到”在现代汉语中的使用情况进行了对比研究。同时利用主观化、可及性、象似性、叠加与强化等认知语言学理论对形成某些趋势的原因进行分析与探究。 全文共分为五章：第一章为对文章的概括性介绍，，阐明了选题缘由与意义，确定了研究范围、语料来源和研究方法，并且对文中所要用到的主观性、可及性、象似性、叠加与强化等理论加以介绍；第二章为相关研究综述，将相关文献分为“涉及到”的相关研究和“涉及”与“涉及到”的对比研究两类，综合介绍了前人对“涉及”与“涉及到”所做的研究及其成果，并且指出其中的优点与不足；第三章主要研究“涉及”与“涉及到”的关涉成分，从词、短语、名词性成分等几方面对所选取的“涉及”与“涉及到”语料进行统计与分析，得出二者在关涉成分上倾向的不同，并利用可及性、象似性等理论对其形成原因进行分析；第四章主要研究“涉及”与“涉及到”的关涉距离，通过与关涉成分的综合对比分析，得出“涉及”和“涉及到”在关涉距离上的不同趋势，并且利用叠加与强化、主观化等认知理论对其原因加以分析；第五章为结论，总结了上文所述“涉及”与“涉及到”的不同点及其形成原因，并且说明了文章中的不足。
[Abstract]:Based on the statistics and analysis of the relevant data in the CCL Corpus of the Center of Chinese Linguistics of Peking University, This paper makes a comparative study of the usage of "concern" and "concern" in modern Chinese, and analyzes and probes into the reasons for the formation of some trends by using the cognitive linguistic theories such as subjectivity, accessibility, iconicity, superposition and reinforcement. The full text is divided into five chapters: the first chapter is a general introduction to the article, which clarifies the reason and significance of the selected topic, determines the scope of the research, the source of the corpus and the research methods, and makes use of the subjectivity, accessibility, iconicity of the text. The second chapter is a review of relevant research, which divides the relevant literature into two categories: the related research and the comparative study of the "involved" and "involved". This paper introduces the previous researches on "concern" and "concern" and their achievements, and points out the advantages and disadvantages of them. Chapter three mainly studies the related components of "related" and "involved", from words and phrases. This paper makes statistics and analysis on the selected corpus of "concern" and "concern" from the aspects of nominal components, and draws the conclusion that they have different tendencies in the related components, and analyzes the reasons for their formation by using the theories of accessibility and iconicity. The fourth chapter mainly studies the related distance between "involved" and "involved". Through a comprehensive comparative analysis with the components involved, the author draws a conclusion that the different trends of the "involved" and "related" in the distance involved, and the use of superposition and reinforcement. The fifth chapter is the conclusion, which summarizes the difference between the "involved" and "involved" and the reasons for their formation, and explains the shortcomings of the article.
【学位授予单位】：北京大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2013
【分类号】：H195.3


本文编号：1660634