现代汉语反义复合情态副词的语法化研究
本文选题:反义复合情态副词 切入点:语法化 出处:《吉林大学》2013年硕士论文
【摘要】:肯定和否定是几乎所有语言中都存在的两大范畴。本文着重分析了现代汉语中的9个反义复合情态副词,包括“多少”、“好歹”、“早晚”、“迟早”、“始终”、“左右”、“横竖”、“反正”、“死活”等。根据这9个词可分为三种义序类型且各类型用于肯定、否定的频率不同,将9个词分为三个次类,并力求通过对这三个次类的共时、历时分析,,揭示反义复合情态副词语法化的原因、条件及其成员相互替代整合的原因。 全文内容共分为七章: 第1章主要论述了5个方面的内容:论题的源起,反义复合情态副词的界定,反义复合情态副词的研究现状,反义复合情态副词研究的不足之处,反义复合情态副词语法化研究的研究对象、语料来源及研究方法。 第2章主要论述了3个方面的内容:第一小节说明了现代汉语反义复合情态副词的分类依据、分类方法、分类原理,第二小节主要描写了反义复合情态副词在现代汉语中的共时特征,第三小节对9个词的语法化程度进行了统计。 第3章主要论述了肯定类反义复合情态副词各成员语法化的过程、动因,并对肯定类反义复合情态副词语法化等级、语法化原因进行了分析。认为肯定类反义复合情态副词语法化的原因有两个:其一,语义中“量”的意义;其二,必然事实、希望事实与心理上的积极意义重合。 第4章主要论述了肯/否定类反义复合情态副词各成员语法化的过程、动因,并对肯/否定类反义复合情态副词语法化等级、语法化原因进行了分析。认为肯/否定类反义复合情态副词语法化的原因有两个:其一,语义中“量”的意义的均衡化;其二,“隐喻”机制作用下语义的主观化。 第5章主要论述了否定类反义复合情态副词各成员语法化的过程、动因,并对否定类反义复合情态副词语法化等级、语法化原因进行了分析。认为否定类反义复合情态副词语法化的原因有两个:其一,语义中“量”的意义;其二,必然事实、不希望事实与心理上的消极意义重合。 第6章主要论述了反义复合情态副词语法化的条件及其相互替代的原因:其语法化条件有三个,分别是语义的相宜性、句法环境的诱发、双音化趋势的推动。其相互替代的原因是语音演化规律和其他个性原因。 第7章是结语,对整篇论文进行了总结。
[Abstract]:Positive and negative is two categories in almost all languages. This paper focuses on the analysis of the 9 antisense compound modal adverbs in modern Chinese, including "how much", "good", "sooner or later", "sooner or later", "always", "about", "the money", "anyway". "Birth and death". According to the 9 words can be divided into three types and each type of Yixu for sure, the negative frequency is different, 9 words are divided into three sub categories, and strive through the three categories of synchronic, diachronic analysis, reveals the reasons of antisense compound modal adverbs method the conditions and members of alternative integration reasons.
The full text is divided into seven chapters.
The first chapter mainly discusses 5 aspects: the topic of the origin, definition of antisense compound modal adverbs, the research status of antisense compound modal adverbs, modal adverbs deficiencies of the composite antisense, study of antisense composite modal adverb syntax of the data sources and methods.
The second chapter mainly discusses 3 aspects: the first section describes the basis of classification, modern Chinese antisense composite modal adverb classification method, the classification principle, the second section mainly describes the antisense compound modal adverbs in modern Chinese synchronic characteristics, the statistics of the third section degree of grammaticalization of 9 words were.
The third chapter mainly discusses the process of certain class of antisense compound modal adverbs of each member of the causes, and on certain classes of antisense composite modal adverb syntax of grammatical level, analyzed the reason that there are two reasons. Certain classes of antisense composite modal adverb syntax of: first, semantic the meaning of "quantity"; second, the inevitable fact, hope the positive meaning and psychological facts coincide.
The fourth chapter mainly discusses the kind of antisense compound Ken / negative modal adverbs members of the grammaticalization process, motivation, and the negative class Ken / antisense composite modal adverb syntax of grade, grammatical reasons are analyzed. There are two reasons to think / no kind of antisense composite modal adverb syntax of the the equalization, semantic meaning of "quantity"; second, "metaphor" mechanism of semantic subjectification.
The fifth chapter mainly discusses the process of the negative class antisense compound modal adverbs of each member of the causes, and the negative class antisense composite modal adverb syntax of grade, grammatical reasons are analyzed. Think there are two reasons of the negative class antisense composite modal adverb syntax of: first, semantic the meaning of "quantity"; second, the inevitable fact that don't want negative meaning and psychological facts coincide.
The sixth chapter mainly discusses the antisense composite modal adverb syntax of the conditions and reasons of alternative: the grammatical conditions are three, respectively, for the semantic, syntactic induced environment, promote the two tone trend. The alternative is phonetic evolution and its reasons of his personality.
The seventh chapter is the conclusion, and summarizes the whole paper.
【学位授予单位】:吉林大学
【学位级别】:硕士
【学位授予年份】:2013
【分类号】:H146.2
【参考文献】
相关期刊论文 前10条
1 闫文文;;也说“好歹”的语法化[J];安徽文学(下半月);2009年08期
2 刘哲;;反义复合词“死活”的语法化[J];安康学院学报;2011年02期
3 徐山;;《潜夫论》反义并列复词与《汉语大词典》编纂[J];保定师范专科学校学报;2006年03期
4 马真;先秦复音词初探[J];北京大学学报(哲学社会科学版);1980年05期
5 戴浩一;叶蜚声;;以认知为基础的汉语功能语法刍议(上)[J];国外语言学;1990年04期
6 沈家煊;转指和转喻[J];当代语言学;1999年01期
7 袁毓林;句子的焦点结构及其对语义解释的影响[J];当代语言学;2003年04期
8 沈家煊;实词虚化的机制──《演化而来的语法》评介[J];当代语言学;1998年03期
9 陈伟武;论先秦反义复合词的产生及其偏义现象[J];古汉语研究;1989年01期
10 祖生利;《景德传灯录》中的联合式复音词[J];古汉语研究;2002年03期
相关博士学位论文 前4条
1 陈全静;汉语并列式双音时间副词的词汇化及相关问题研究[D];上海师范大学;2011年
2 雷冬平;近代汉语常用双音虚词演变研究及认知分析[D];浙江大学;2006年
3 江傲霜;六朝笔记小说词汇研究[D];山东大学;2007年
4 曾丹;反义复合词形成演变的认知研究[D];浙江大学;2007年
相关硕士学位论文 前8条
1 郭奕晶;反义相成词探究[D];山东师范大学;2000年
2 卢志宁;近代汉语中的“早晚”与“多咱”[D];河北师范大学;2003年
3 袁莉容;现代汉语句子时间语义范畴研究[D];四川师范大学;2004年
4 夏赛辉;汉语或然性认识情态动词语法化研究[D];湖南大学;2004年
5 张谦;现代汉语反义语素合成词研究[D];河北大学;2006年
6 王冠;反义语素合成词研究[D];东北师范大学;2006年
7 于丹;“反正”的多角度研究[D];吉林大学;2007年
8 龚俊恒;现代汉语反义对立式语气副词研究[D];河南大学;2009年
本文编号:1721089
本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/wenyilunwen/yuyanxuelw/1721089.html