台湾塑化剂事件新闻报道的积极话语分析

发布时间：2018-04-14 04:35

本文选题：评价理论 + 塑化剂新闻　；参考：《河南科技大学》2013年硕士论文

【摘要】：在韩礼德的系统功能语法的基础上，评价理论得以产生和发展。该理论是对系统功能语法中人际元功能的延伸。它主要关注的是语篇中那些用于表达情感，态度和立场的评价资源，作为一种分析工具被广泛运用到各种语篇分析中，如新闻，演讲，文学作品，广告等。然而，大多数研究是从解构的角度以批判消极的态度来揭示语篇中隐藏的意识形态。过于关注语篇中的不平等现象和冲突，容易误导民众，不利于发挥话语的建构作用。所以，Martin提出积极话语分析作为一种新的话语分析视角。不同于批评性话语分析，它是从建构的角度，采用积极的态度对话语进行解读，用更加积极向上的态度对待各种社会矛盾以及一些不平等的现象，旨在通过话语分析建立一个和谐美好的人类社会。因此，，本文以评价理论作为理论框架，采用定性的分析方法对人民日报中有关台湾“塑化剂”食品安全事件的报道进行了分析。本文尝试从积极话语分析的视角解决以下问题：1）各种评价资源在所选的新闻语篇中是如何分布的及其原因？2）人民日报对此食品安全事件持怎样的态度？3）记者如何有效的运用各种评价资源来为弱势群体提供话语平台，并协调大陆和台湾之间的利益冲突？通过对所选语篇进行定性分析，得出如下结论：首先，由于评价理论各子系统的作用不同以及新闻语篇的特点，所以各种评价资源在语篇中的分布是不均衡的。其次，这些评价资源表明人民日报只是对台湾塑化剂事件进行了客观的及时报道，对事件涉及的人或人的行为进行积极或消极的评价，并没有任何情绪性的攻击，这有助于拉近与潜在读者的关系，团结民众。最后，在新闻语篇中通过有效的运用评价系统下的各种评价手段极大的促进了新闻话语发挥积极作用,使不同利益团体拥有平等的话语权。这种积极的建构的话语有助于社会团结，促进和谐社会的创建。
[Abstract]:On the basis of Halliday's systematic functional grammar, the theory of evaluation has been developed.This theory is an extension of interpersonal metafunctions in systemic functional grammar.As an analytical tool, it is widely used in discourse analysis, such as news, speech, literary works, advertising and so on.However, most of the studies reveal the hidden ideology in discourse from the perspective of deconstruction by criticizing negative attitudes.Too much attention to inequality and conflict in discourse can easily mislead the public and is not conducive to the constructive role of discourse.So Martin puts forward positive discourse analysis as a new perspective of discourse analysis.Different from critical discourse analysis, it uses positive attitudes to interpret discourse from a constructive point of view, and adopts a more positive attitude towards various social contradictions and some unequal phenomena.The purpose is to establish a harmonious and beautiful human society through discourse analysis.Therefore, using the evaluation theory as the theoretical framework, the qualitative analysis method is used to analyze People's Daily's report on Taiwan's "plasticizer" food safety incident.This paper attempts to solve the following questions from the perspective of positive discourse analysis: 1) how the various evaluation resources are distributed in the selected news discourse and why) what is People's Daily's attitude towards this food safety incident?Effective use of various evaluation resources to provide a discourse platform for vulnerable groups,And coordinate conflicts of interest between the mainland and Taiwan?Based on the qualitative analysis of the selected texts, the following conclusions are drawn: firstly, due to the different roles of each subsystem of evaluation theory and the characteristics of news discourse, the distribution of various evaluation resources in the text is not balanced.Secondly, these evaluation resources show that People's Daily only reported the Taiwan plasticizer incident in an objective and timely manner, and made positive or negative assessments of the behavior of the person or person involved in the incident, without any emotional attack.This helps bring the relationship with potential readers closer and unites the public.Finally, through the effective use of various evaluation methods under the evaluation system, news discourse plays a positive role in news discourse, and makes different interest groups have equal right to speak.This constructive discourse is helpful to social unity and the establishment of a harmonious society.
【学位授予单位】：河南科技大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2013
【分类号】：H15;G212

【参考文献】