《蒙古秘史》与罗卜桑丹津《黄金史》对应部分的比较研究

发布时间：2018-04-20 02:07

  本文选题：《蒙古秘史》 + 罗卜桑丹津《黄金史》　； 参考：《内蒙古大学》2013年博士论文

【摘要】：《蒙古秘史》和罗卜桑丹津《黄金史》是蒙古族历史文献研究和中世纪蒙古语研究十分珍贵的典籍。罗卜桑丹津《黄金史》是源于《蒙古秘史》同一内容的文献典籍。这两种不同时期历史文献的比较研究开始于20世纪30年代,而且取得了辉煌的成就。但详细比较《蒙古秘史》和罗卜桑丹津《黄金史》的专题研究尚未问世。本文在前人研究成果的基础上,《蒙古秘史》和罗卜桑丹津《黄金史》为研究对象,全面系统的比较研究了《蒙古秘史》和罗卜桑丹津《黄金史》对应部分的逐行逐字的差异。 全文由导论、正文、总结等三大部分组成。 导论简要介绍了《蒙古秘史》与罗卜桑丹津《黄金史》比较研究的国内外研究情况、研究目的和研究意义、研究方法等。 第一章《编写差异》,比较研究了《蒙古秘史》和罗卜桑丹津《黄金史》的对应部分的字句减删、字句添加、字句改写、字句调换等编写时出现的情况。并提出了《蒙古秘史》和《黄金史》的抄写者参考的《蒙古秘史》原本不是同一个版本。 第二章《词汇差异》,比较研究了《蒙古秘史》与罗卜桑丹津《黄金史》对应部分的所有字句,用描述法、解释法,抄写者无意中的改词、抄写者有目的的改写、抄写者误读所改词等方面阐述,并解析其产生的原因。 第三章《语法形态差异》,比较研究了《蒙古秘史》与罗卜桑丹津《黄金史》对应部分的名词、动词形态的差异。名词研究,比较研究名词的格、领属、数、性等范畴内的差异。动词的研究,主要比较研究动词附加成分的不同用法和形动词、副动词形式的差异。总结说明了13世纪和17世纪蒙古语的有些语法内容的不同和蒙古语言的历史演变现象。 第四章《文字书写差异》,比较研究了《蒙古秘史》与罗卜桑丹津《黄金史》对应部分的所有文字。文字书写差异里有文字符号删减、文字符号添加、文字符号改写、文字符号调换等现象。详细研究每个文字的差异,解释说明了由回鹘蒙古文书写时造成的误解等。并更进一步确定《蒙古秘史》原版本是有回鹘蒙古文式书本。 总结部分归纳总结全文内容和所取得的研究成果。
[Abstract]:The secret history of Mongolia and the history of gold in Robsantanjin are valuable books for the study of Mongolian historical literature and medieval Mongolian language. The history of gold in Robsantanjin is a classic document from the same content of Mongol Secret History. The comparative study of these two historical documents in different periods began in the 1930's and made brilliant achievements. But a detailed comparison of Mongol Secret History and Robsantanjin Gold History has not yet been published. On the basis of previous research results, this paper makes a comprehensive and systematic comparative study of the differences between the corresponding parts of Mongol Secret History and Rothandanjin's Gold History, and the corresponding parts of Mongolian Secret History and the Gold History of Robsantanjin, respectively, on the basis of the previous research results, and the author makes a comprehensive and systematic comparative study of the differences between the corresponding parts of Mongol Secret History and the Gold History. The full text consists of three parts: introduction, text and summary. The introduction briefly introduces the domestic and international research situation, research purpose and significance, research methods and so on of the comparative study of "the Secret History of Mongolia" and "the History of Gold" with that of Robsantanjin. The first chapter, "compiling differences", compares and studies the writing of the corresponding parts of Mongolian Secret History and Robsantanjin's Golden History, such as sentence subtraction, sentence addition, sentence rewriting, word and sentence exchange and so on. And put forward that the secret history of Mongolia is not the same version as that of the scribe of gold. Chapter two, "differences in Vocabulary", compares and studies all the words and phrases in the corresponding parts of "Mongol Secret History" and "the Golden History" of Robsantanjin. By means of description, interpretation, the unintentional change of words by the scribe, the writer rewrites the words purposefully. The writer misreads the changed words and analyzes the reasons for them. Chapter three, "grammatical morphological differences", compares the noun and verb morphology of the corresponding parts of Mongol Secret History and Robsandanjin's Golden History. A comparative study of noun differences in the categories of case, genus, number, sex, etc. The study of verbs mainly compares the different usage of verb adjunct and the difference of form verb and accessory verb form. This paper summarizes the differences of some grammatical contents between the 13 th century and 17 th century Mongolian and the historical evolution of Mongolian language. Chapter four, "the difference of Writing", compares and studies all the characters in the corresponding parts of the Secret History of Mongolia and the Golden History of Robsantanjin. The differences in character writing include character symbol deletion, character symbol addition, character symbol rewriting, character symbol exchange and so on. The differences of each language are studied in detail, and the misunderstanding caused by the Uyghur Mongolian writing is explained. And further confirmed that the original version of the Mongol History is a Uighur Mongolian book. The summary part summarizes the content of the full text and the research results obtained.
【学位授予单位】：内蒙古大学
【学位级别】：博士
【学位授予年份】：2013
【分类号】：H212
，

本文编号：1775746