霍维奇论意义、真与使用

发布时间：2018-06-27 03:41

  本文选题：意义的使用理论 + 紧缩论　； 参考：《自然辩证法研究》2012年10期

【摘要】：霍维奇在拒斥真之理论语义学的前提下提出倾向性的使用理论,他认为后者的优势在于能够解释意义与使用之间的密切联系。在该理论中,意义被还原为心理学的而非语义学的倾向性接受概念。这种还原导致,它本身无法从语言的实际使用中区分出符合意义规范性的理想使用,以致无法对意义与使用的联系做出令人满意的说明,进而不能完全刻画意义概念。由于诉诸心理学而非语义学的概念,霍维奇的使用理论还隐含着导致意义虚无化的严重危险。这些同时也说明了使用理论未必优越于语义学理论。
[Abstract]:On the premise of rejecting the theoretical semantics of truth, Horvich put forward the tendentiousness theory of use, which, he believes, has the advantage of being able to explain the close relationship between meaning and use. In this theory, meaning is reduced to the concept of psychological rather than semantic tendentiousness. As a result of this kind of reduction, it can not distinguish the ideal use which accords with the meaning norm from the actual use of language, so that it can not give a satisfactory explanation of the relation between meaning and use, and then it can not completely depict the concept of meaning. By resorting to the concept of psychology rather than semantics, Horvich's theory of use implies a serious danger of nothingness. It also shows that the theory of use is not superior to the theory of semantics.
【作者单位】： 中南财经政法大学哲学系;
【基金】：中南财经政法大学科研基金(31541110114,语言哲学中的意义问题研究) 中国人民大学科学研究基金(10XNJ022,逻辑哲学若干重要问题研究)
【分类号】：H030
，

本文编号：2072528