微博中话语标记语“好吧”研究

发布时间：2018-09-12 11:19

【摘要】：话语标记语是语言中一种特殊的功能性成分：语法上结构独立,不与相邻成分构成更大的语言单位,其有无不影响句子的合法性；语义上不具有概念意义,只具有程序意义,不构成话语的具体语义内容；功能上,它们可以衔接前后语句,从整体上对话语的理解起引导和调控作用；它们可以是词、短语,也可以是句子,是一个开放的功能性分类。它们广泛分布于日常口语和书面语中,通过调控话语的表达和理解来影响交际的进程。因此,有关话语标记语的研究对于人们更深入地认识和掌握语言规律,指导日常交际,促进交际的有效进行等都具有重要意义。本文正是以此为出发点,在前人研究的成果之上,以微博为考察对象对新兴话语标记语“好吧”进行了全面研究。本文共分为四个部分：第一部分为绪论部分,主要包括对国内外研究现状的概述、对话语标记语的重新界定、话语标记语“好吧”的身份认定以及本文的研究方法、创新和研究意义等。第二部分,首先搜集语料进行分析并制定出图表,考察话语标记语“好吧”的分布特点。其次,通过考察大量实例对话语标记语的语用功能进行概括：交际互动功能和语篇组织功能。其中,交际互动功能主要包括：弱化语力,缓和对面子的威胁；增强语力,提醒对方注意；引出评价,表明立场态度。语篇组织功能主要包括：话题起始的标记；话题结束的标记；话题转换的标记；话题信息的补充标记；彰显话题背景。第三部分,首先从共时角度考察话语标记语“好吧”的演化路径；其次从历时角度考察话语标记语“好吧”在古代汉语中的使用情况；最后考察其形成动因和机制。通过考察其演化过程,我们认为语用原则的制约、主观化和句法环境等是其形成主要动因,语用推理和推导义的固化是其形成机制。第四部分为结论部分,回顾总结全文内容,并对遗存问题进行补充。
[Abstract]:Discourse markers are a special functional component in language. They are grammatically independent and do not constitute a larger language unit with adjacent elements, which affect the validity of sentences, and have no conceptual meaning, but only procedural meaning. They do not constitute the specific semantic content of the discourse; functionally, they can connect the sentences before and after, and they can guide and regulate the understanding of the discourse as a whole; they can be words, phrases, or sentences, and they can be an open functional classification. They are widely distributed in daily spoken and written language and influence the process of communication by regulating the expression and understanding of discourse. Therefore, the study of discourse markers is of great significance for people to understand and master language rules, guide daily communication and promote effective communication. This paper takes this as the starting point and makes a comprehensive study of the emerging discourse marker "OK" on the basis of the achievements of previous studies. This paper is divided into four parts: the first part is the introduction part, which mainly includes the overview of the domestic and foreign research situation, the redefinition of discourse markers, the identification of the discourse marker "OK" and the research methods of this paper. The significance of innovation and research. In the second part, we collect the corpus and make a chart to investigate the distribution of the discourse marker "OK". Secondly, the pragmatic functions of discourse markers are summarized by examining a large number of examples: communicative interaction and discourse organization. Among them, communicative interaction functions mainly include: weakening verbal power, mitigating threats to face; enhancing verbal power, reminding the other party's attention; eliciting evaluation and expressing attitude. The functions of discourse organization include: the beginning of the topic, the end of the topic, the change of the topic, the supplementary mark of the topic information, and the background of the topic. In the third part, we first investigate the evolution path of discourse marker "OK" from a synchronic point of view; secondly, from a diachronic point of view, examine the use of discourse marker "OK" in ancient Chinese; and finally, examine its formation motivation and mechanism. By examining its evolution, we think that the restriction of pragmatic principle, subjectivization and syntactic environment are the main reasons for its formation, and the solidification of pragmatic inference and derivation is the formation mechanism. The fourth part is the conclusion.
【学位授予单位】：华中师范大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2013
【分类号】：H136

【参考文献】