中国日报和华盛顿邮报关于香港占中新闻报道的批评性话语分析
发布时间：2018-11-13 09:11
【摘要】：批评话语分析(简称CDA)出现于20世纪70年代,其主要的研究目的是分析和探讨特定话语的语言特点及其政治、文化背景进行批评性,揭示出新闻语篇报道背后所隐藏的意识形态和权利关系,以证实新闻语篇的主观性和倾向性,进一步的挖掘新闻记者的写作意图和其代表政治利益集团的观点和立场。本文以《中国日报》和《华盛顿邮报》中对2014年香港占中事件的相关报道为语料,以韩礼德的系统功能语法和费尔克拉夫的三维分析模式为理论框架,进行了批评性分析,探讨中美两国的新闻记者是如何运用语言来隐藏意识形态意义,并阐述新闻语篇背后所暗含的意识形态意义和权力关系。通过对所收集的新闻语料的分析,本文得出了以下的结论：表面上看似客观公正的新闻报道隐晦地表达了其政治利益集团所代表的意识形态倾向和权力关系。所得出的结果体现出：1、新闻记者使用不同的词汇来表达对特定政治事件的观点；2、在情态系统的使用方面,新闻记者通过巧妙地变换时态,并且通过直接和间接转述引语来表达或者强调对相关新闻报道的态度,以及他们所代表的权力集团的立场；3、通过中方和美方报道的对比,美方的新闻记者更频繁地使用分析方式中名词化词语和被动语态两种系统方式,并且对语料进行一定地删除、用词的替换、语意的重新排列,以表达了他们所代表的权力集团的观点。因此,在对政治新闻的分析领域,从批评性话语分析的视角来看,新闻记者隐含在各大政治事件的新闻报道背后的写作意图及权利倾向将具有一定的现实意义,运用对比分析的方法,我们不仅可以更透彻地理解并阐释语篇,而且也能够揭示话语、意识形态和权力之间的关系。
[Abstract]:Critical discourse Analysis (CDA) appeared in the 1970s. Its main purpose is to analyze and explore the linguistic characteristics and political and cultural background of a particular discourse. In order to prove the subjectivity and tendency of news discourse, the author reveals the hidden relationship between ideology and power behind the news discourse, and further excavates the writing intention of journalists and the viewpoints and stands of political interest groups. Based on the reports on the Hong Kong occupation of China in 2014 in China Daily and the Washington Post, this paper makes a critical analysis on Halliday's systemic functional grammar and Felke's three-dimensional analytical model. This paper discusses how journalists in China and the United States use language to hide the ideological meaning, and expounds the ideological meaning and power relationship behind the news discourse. Based on the analysis of the collected news corpus, this paper draws the following conclusions: the seemingly objective and impartial news reports implicitly express the ideological tendency and power relationship represented by their political interest groups. The results show that: 1, journalists use different words to express their views on specific political events; (2) in the use of modality system, journalists express or emphasize their attitude towards relevant news reports by skillfully changing tenses, and by directly and indirectly reporting quotations, as well as the positions of the power groups they represent; 3. Through the comparison of Chinese and American reports, American journalists used more frequently the two systematic methods of nominalization and passive voice in the analysis method, and carried out certain deletion of the corpus, replacement of the words, and rearrangement of the meaning. To express the views of the power groups they represent. Therefore, in the field of analysis of political news, from the perspective of critical discourse analysis, the writing intention and right tendency of journalists hidden behind the news reports of major political events will have certain practical significance. By means of contrastive analysis, we can not only understand and interpret discourse more thoroughly, but also reveal the relationship among discourse, ideology and power.
【学位授予单位】：南京师范大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2015
【分类号】：H15;H315
本文编号：2328656
[Abstract]:Critical discourse Analysis (CDA) appeared in the 1970s. Its main purpose is to analyze and explore the linguistic characteristics and political and cultural background of a particular discourse. In order to prove the subjectivity and tendency of news discourse, the author reveals the hidden relationship between ideology and power behind the news discourse, and further excavates the writing intention of journalists and the viewpoints and stands of political interest groups. Based on the reports on the Hong Kong occupation of China in 2014 in China Daily and the Washington Post, this paper makes a critical analysis on Halliday's systemic functional grammar and Felke's three-dimensional analytical model. This paper discusses how journalists in China and the United States use language to hide the ideological meaning, and expounds the ideological meaning and power relationship behind the news discourse. Based on the analysis of the collected news corpus, this paper draws the following conclusions: the seemingly objective and impartial news reports implicitly express the ideological tendency and power relationship represented by their political interest groups. The results show that: 1, journalists use different words to express their views on specific political events; (2) in the use of modality system, journalists express or emphasize their attitude towards relevant news reports by skillfully changing tenses, and by directly and indirectly reporting quotations, as well as the positions of the power groups they represent; 3. Through the comparison of Chinese and American reports, American journalists used more frequently the two systematic methods of nominalization and passive voice in the analysis method, and carried out certain deletion of the corpus, replacement of the words, and rearrangement of the meaning. To express the views of the power groups they represent. Therefore, in the field of analysis of political news, from the perspective of critical discourse analysis, the writing intention and right tendency of journalists hidden behind the news reports of major political events will have certain practical significance. By means of contrastive analysis, we can not only understand and interpret discourse more thoroughly, but also reveal the relationship among discourse, ideology and power.
【学位授予单位】：南京师范大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2015
【分类号】：H15;H315
【参考文献】
相关期刊论文 前1条
1 辛斌;新闻语篇转述引语的批评性分析[J];外语教学与研究;1998年02期
，本文编号：2328656
本文链接：https://www.wllwen.com/wenyilunwen/yuyanxuelw/2328656.html
