汉日比较句的省略对照研究
[Abstract]:In the field of linguistics, comparison is widely used as a way to understand things. When comparing the merits and demerits of two or more things, the comparative sentence is often used. However, the same concept of comparison, reflected in different languages, there will be a number of differences. In Japanese, the sentence structure of table comparison is a comparative sentence marked by "Li", while the typical comparative sentence in Chinese is marked by "bi". In both Chinese and Japanese, ellipsis is often used in order to enrich and refine the expression of one's ideas. When communicating one's own thoughts to others in a comparative sentence, one part of the comparative sentence is often omitted. The ellipsis of comparative sentences is normal for native speakers, but difficult for non-native language learners. Japanese comparative sentences and Chinese comparative sentences seem to be the same, but with the deepening of Japanese learning, we will find many differences between Chinese and Japanese comparative sentences. In particular, it is very difficult to grasp the ellipsis of comparative sentences. So, how the ellipsis of comparative sentences is reflected in Chinese and Japanese, how the comparative elements of comparative sentences are omitted, and what are the factors affecting ellipsis. In order to find out the similarities and differences of comparative sentences in Chinese and Japanese by solving the above problems. Based on the comparative sentences in Japanese and Chinese, the similarities and differences between Chinese and Chinese comparative sentences are analyzed through examples in daily life. The main conclusions are as follows: first, the comparison sentence and the comparative sentence must meet three conditions. First of all, we should satisfy the conditions for the establishment of general comparative sentences. Then, the omitted sentence must have the same meaning as the original sentence. Finally, if necessary, the omitted sentence pattern can be restored to the original sentence pattern. Second, the comparative element ellipsis of the comparative sentence, not only the comparison of the latter term can be omitted, the comparison of the preceding item can also be omitted. When comparing the ellipsis of the preceding paragraph, the comparative sentence is generally not omitted. In Chinese, there are many cases of omitting the preceding item. In comparison with the preceding item, "N of Ns 1" can be replaced with "Ns 1" or "NSP 1". Third, there are three ellipses in Japanese and Chinese. The latter term "N" can be omitted as "Ns _ 2", "N _ s _ 2" or "N _ s _ 2" and "N _ s _ 2". However, it does not mean that the ellipsis of the comparative term in Chinese is exactly the same as the ellipsis in Japanese. In which case there are many constraints on which type will be omitted. The semantic relationship between "N _ S _ 1" and "N _ T _ 2" has a great influence on ellipsis. Fourth, the position of the comparative theme is relatively free. The comparison theme appears in the comparison predicate position and the hidden situation, the comparison sentence and the comparison sentence are the same. In addition, since Chinese is an independent language, the comparative theme can also be placed at the beginning of the sentence.
【学位授予单位】:湖南大学
【学位级别】:硕士
【学位授予年份】:2015
【分类号】:H146.3;H36
【相似文献】
相关期刊论文 前10条
1 侯明午;;汉语否定比较句初探[J];科教文汇(中旬刊);2013年09期
2 罗福腾;《聊斋俚曲》与淄博方言的比较句[J];蒲松龄研究;1993年Z1期
3 华景年;;带“比”的比较句[J];语文学习;1960年04期
4 蒋平;;比较句中的“更”“还”“要”[J];语文教学与研究;1979年04期
5 刘勇;几种带有否定词的比较句型[J];大学英语;1994年03期
6 柳英绿;韩汉语比较句对比[J];汉语学习;2002年06期
7 由权;试谈法语比较句的翻译[J];法语学习;2003年02期
8 刘长征;递及比较句的语义理解及制约因素[J];汉语学习;2005年02期
9 文全民;;“更”和“还”在肯定与否定比较句中的差异[J];世界汉语教学;2008年01期
10 胡斌彬;;古汉语“于”字比较句功能补正[J];西南民族大学学报(人文社科版);2009年03期
相关会议论文 前1条
1 周国炎;;布依语比较句的结构类型[A];布依学研究(之六)——贵州省布依学会第二届第二次年会暨第六次学术讨论会论文集[C];1997年
相关博士学位论文 前2条
1 谢白羽;面向对外汉语教学的比较句研究[D];华东师范大学;2011年
2 耿直;基于语料库的比较句式“跟、有、比”的描写与分析[D];北京大学;2012年
相关硕士学位论文 前10条
1 程春君;初级阶段印度留学生汉语比较句习得偏误与教学对策研究[D];渤海大学;2015年
2 李林珈;汉语“有/没有”式比较句的逻辑语义分析[D];四川师范大学;2015年
3 赵颖;对外汉语教材中比较句的教学研究[D];苏州大学;2015年
4 江丽丽;永定客家方言比较句研究[D];福建师范大学;2015年
5 巴特格日乐;汉蒙“比较句”的异同与对蒙古国学生“‘比’字句”教学方法探究[D];内蒙古师范大学;2015年
6 官俊;对外汉语综合课教材中比较句练习设计研究[D];湖南师范大学;2015年
7 廖英;三种否定比较句的对外汉语教学[D];湖南师范大学;2015年
8 张若s,
本文编号:2409463
本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/wenyilunwen/yuyanxuelw/2409463.html