话语标记“怎么”研究
[Abstract]:This paper defines "how" as a discourse marker in modern Chinese, which is based on systemic functional linguistics, coherence theory, relevance theory, subjective theory and grammaticalization theory, on the basis of inheriting and absorbing the previous research achievements. Using the methods of synchronic and diachronic, description and explanation, data collection and statistics, this paper makes a multi-angle investigation on the discourse marker "how". The full text is divided into six chapters: the first chapter is an introduction. From the aspects of "how", semantic function, syntactic expression, variation of "how" and comparative study, this chapter comprehensively combs the research results of "how" and points out its shortcomings. The research ideas and methods of this paper are also introduced. The second chapter is the definition of "how" of discourse markers. In this chapter, discourse markers are defined as expressions widely existing in discourse, relatively independent in syntactic structure, having only programmed functions and recognizable expressions in speech. It is concluded that in the beginning of the sentence, there is a short pause separated from the subsequent sentence, which does not have the function of questioning, but only the "how" of expressing the communicative meaning as the discourse marker. The data analysis shows that the discourse marker "how" usually indicates the mood of statement, or the cross-examination and the tone of questioning; the following sentences are mostly rhetorical, the questions of right and wrong and specific questions are often asked, and the flowing sentences and zero sentences are also more common. Chapter three is about the stylistic features and textual functions of the discourse marker "how". In the aspect of stylistic distribution, the discourse marker "how" mainly appears in the discourse style, and is less used in the non-conversational style, and it mostly indicates the characters' inner monologue or the author's narration, and has the virtual dialogue style characteristic. In terms of discourse function, the discourse marker "how" has the functions of turn-shifting, turn-continuing organization, topic initiation and topic processing. The fourth chapter is about the unexpected function and interpersonal function of the discourse marker "how". The utterance marker "how" has the unanticipated function such as expressing the anti-expectation information, the expected (unexpected) information, the superexpected information, the negative anticipatory information and so on; It has five kinds of interactive functions, such as surprise, dissatisfaction, speculation and concern, pause filling, refutation and questioning, joke and ridicule, satire and provocation, which reflect the subjectivity and interaction subjectivity of language. The interpersonal function of "how" originates from its unexpected function and is based on unexpected function. Chapter five: the formation and motivation of discourse marker "how". The use of "how" discourse markers sprouted in the Yuan Dynasty, developed in the Ming Dynasty, and matured in the Qing Dynasty. There are many reasons for the grammaticalization of "how" and the formation of the function of discourse markers: the interrogative pronoun "how:" is loosely related to the main verbs in the sentence, and its position in the sentence is flexible. It is the syntactic basis of developing the use of discourse markers. It is the semantic mechanism of grammaticalization of interrogative pronouns to obtain negative meanings in rhetorical sentences and develop discourse markers with unexpected meanings, while pragmatic reasoning is the key mechanism for the formation of discourse markers. Metaphor is the cognitive mechanism of semantic transformation of "how". Chapter VI conclusion. This paper summarizes the research content, and points out the lack of research and problems to be solved.
【学位授予单位】:华东师范大学
【学位级别】:硕士
【学位授予年份】:2013
【分类号】:H136
【参考文献】
相关期刊论文 前10条
1 吴璇;;疑问代词“什么”向感叹标记的发展[J];安徽文学(下半月);2011年07期
2 陶红印;试论语体分类的语法学意义[J];当代语言学;1999年03期
3 吴福祥;关于语法化的单向性问题[J];当代语言学;2003年04期
4 袁毓林;;反预期、递进关系和语用尺度的类型——“甚至”和“反而”的语义功能比较[J];当代语言学;2008年02期
5 吕明臣;现代汉语话语指示功能分析[J];东疆学刊;1999年03期
6 冯春田;“×么(摩)”类词语的内部结构分析[J];东岳论丛;1990年06期
7 何自然,莫爱屏;话语标记语与语用照应[J];广东外语外贸大学学报;2002年01期
8 宗守云;;试论“不怎么”的语义表现和语用功能[J];广西师范大学学报(哲学社会科学版);2009年04期
9 董原;;试析“怎么”与“cum”的用法特点[J];东欧;1996年02期
10 丰国欣;话轮转换与话题转换[J];湖北师范学院学报(哲学社会科学版);2000年04期
相关博士学位论文 前3条
1 刘丽艳;口语交际中的话语标记[D];浙江大学;2005年
2 玛琳娜·吉布拉泽;现代汉语疑问代词的多视角研究[D];南京师范大学;2005年
3 于海飞;话轮转换中的话语标记研究[D];山东大学;2006年
相关硕士学位论文 前10条
1 严伟剑;疑问代词“怎么”“怎样”“怎么样”对比研究[D];上海外国语大学;2010年
2 李俊香;汉语的“怎么”在英语中的对应形式[D];延边大学;2003年
3 杜宝莲;反问的否定功能研究[D];暨南大学;2004年
4 肖治野;“怎么”反问句的研究及其教学思考[D];暨南大学;2004年
5 陈天序;基于集合概念的汉语疑问代词非疑问用法研究[D];北京语言大学;2007年
6 郑雷;疑问代词的否定用法考察[D];浙江师范大学;2007年
7 汤路;“怎么”在对韩汉语教学中的策略研究[D];湖南师范大学;2008年
8 刘婷;“怎么着”相关问题研究[D];吉林大学;2010年
9 袁志刚;疑问代词“怎么”非疑问用法研究[D];暨南大学;2010年
10 罗芝莲;汉英疑问词“怎么”和“How”的对比研究[D];湖南师范大学;2010年
,本文编号:2422283
本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/wenyilunwen/yuyanxuelw/2422283.html